Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I havent heard a thing about police asking questions on gay relationships and what profiler made the cross dresser call? I thought it was only me that did that. To a hailstorm of criticism I might add!
seems pretty legit right at the moment judging from the reaction of some people. unsure who that was but probably served as confirmation for whatever they were seeking. shame you can’t ask them.And you just believe it is 100% legit.
From an anonymous email sent to you?
A lot of this is valid but I think there will be a narrow focus on what is basically in front of them (prosecution) . If they start entering all this other stuff it confuses.So I wonder if other POIs are out of the woods yet? I hear most of them have
I think Droc's musings were not unfounded, but maybe a broader group of people up to no good. I think we will hear there were other operators working the same area.
When asked if he would provide DNA and answer questions, he refused because he didn't trust police. Wouldn't police already have his DNA for other crimes? Maybe not, and maybe he stood to be charged for other crimes once on a criminal database.
Who were the people in the taxi, where the woman broke her ankle climbing out?
I think there will be witness's rolling in as the evidence rolls out. More dots to dot connections. Past suspicions conformed.
In the fray of the investigation, which was enormous, a lot of people were turned away. Trial outcomes might confirm other suspicions. Police will be waiting for this also.
To be fair all the reports stated the police recovered no DNA from the 2 women found. I make no assessment on the Peter Weygers and the search for ' organic material'What was interesting, is certain users were abusing other users for saying the CSK case had DNA. The abusers were adamant there was no DNA to this crime.
.
suggestion from who? Experts like you?
I think there could be a feeling/thought that by getting the charges split the propensity might vanishthis is very true crow. he says he is not guilty. did you notice the defence has tried to spilt the charges. know what that means?
That is one explanation and most likely. There is also the external masturbatory element to itI never claimed to be an expert but it doesn't take a genius to suspect a man who's stealing womens underwear and clothing might be wearing them.
agreed. twitter. many individuals are now in a position to form their own opinion. mine was cast when I saw what was online elsewhere. guilty as sin.Only in the eyes of the law. Individuals are allowed their own opinions on guilt or innocence or they may have no opinion at all.
Do you know any ex military Sprockets?Are you ex military Sammy?
What was interesting, is certain users were abusing other users for saying the CSK case had DNA. The abusers were adamant there was no DNA to this crime.
It was not the only point users were abused over. There was tolerated skullduggery by another forum owner.
Extreme aggressive online behavior which turned out to be totally and utterly wrong. There was DNA. Moderators on an online forum did nothing about the predatory behavior, almost condoning the behavior, but moderators took a scolding hand at the victims, victims who turned out to be right on more than one occasion.
There certainly seemed an active campaign in another forum to derail what turned out to be the truth.
Some of the victims were wolf packed by users with the blind eye of that forum owner.
If discussions with some certain people I spoke are true, there were people who knew of this crime. Heavily following by a certain demographic you wouldn't expect.
I don't think there will be another in the area. If you knew the security in place, it is ten times harder than 1996.
This why I became suspicious of the Santen (Paton) case. If it were a crime, it were on the peripheral of security, but not outside. Without a body, I'm not so certain. We heard the Inquest, but there is no body.
Robyn Paton was dropped off by taxi, then gets in car and drives to City Beach carpark. Takes a towel? Never seen again?
Classic girl leaves nightclub stuff.
Look at the Rayney case, marital issues, but was someone else inside the relationship? We were just lucky to discover a body. Rayney was defending a cop in a CCC trial at the time. Not a popular man with criminals.
Yes.Do you know any ex military Sprockets?
Bigger shock to all those loonies that posted even loonier theories like Sothiris and moon dates etcDecember 2016 must have been a shock to them.
Interesting SB.
Dr Phibes posts of 7 & 8 July 2007 were too.
Also comments posted by that retired ex military fella “Phantom62”:
“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007
“Probably male but also a cross dresser” - 5 June 2007
“The killer has preselected from a list he had possession of, I think I know where each victim was murdered (the same place), they were probably kept in this place after their death and then driven to their dumping grounds the following night” - 5 January 2007
Many references throughout those blogs to SASR including responses from P62 himself.
Can't wait for all those charges to be laid. When do you reckon that will be? My educated guess is never. Old 'Phanto' hasn't got much right at all, so far.“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007 Phantom62.
up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from Claremont.
so he was tying Claremont together with up to another 21 disappearances and murders?
don’t doubt that Phantom knows what he is talking about except about there being no DNA.
all that confidence after all.
but thats a pretty specific number and big claim.
next time we see the ex military man Phantom online maybe he can explain this and list out the 24.
“One thing I will say with confidence. The police should not be looking for the Claremont Serial Killer. They should be looking for a serial killer who is responsible for up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from the Claremont area. Serial killers do leave trails in the location of their victims bodies” - 12 July 2007 Phantom62.
up to 24 disappearances and murders including 3 from Claremont.
so he was tying Claremont together with up to another 21 disappearances and murders?
don’t doubt that Phantom knows what he is talking about except about there being no DNA.
all that confidence after all.
but thats a pretty specific number and big claim.
next time we see the ex military man Phantom online maybe he can explain this and list out the 24.
Other persons of interest to officially a suspect, include Peter Weygers the former Mayor of Claremont, Lance Williams RIP, Judo Man, the IT expert who tried to pick up a young girl on the Stirling Highway, Mosman Park and Mark Dixie who raped and stabbed a girl in her apartment before leaving Australia. He went on to murder Sally Ann Bowman back in the UK.
Can anyone share some more info regards Judo Man and the IT expert mentioned in the above part of a post from Shelly G? ( first post in this thread) this is the first i have heard of either of these people?
Yes.
You could shoot him off an email and ask him to explain himself, he's easy to find and writes under his real name
No.Named Ross?
I'm guessing it's Brett Christian. Don't ask me how I came to that conclusion.Which is?