I like how this new you-can't-rush-a-behind rule is being applied because it still allows a behind to be rushed, but only when the defender is under pressure and has no other option.
But why can't they apply the same common sense interpretation to deliberate out-of-bounds? I hate it with a passion that defenders get constantly penalised for this rule even though they may be under extreme pressure and have no other option available other than to give the ball up to the opposition. It's absolute bollocks. Surely defenders should be allowed to be defenders? When a defender is under extreme pressure and has no other option available, he should be allowed the safety of the boundary line!
But why can't they apply the same common sense interpretation to deliberate out-of-bounds? I hate it with a passion that defenders get constantly penalised for this rule even though they may be under extreme pressure and have no other option available other than to give the ball up to the opposition. It's absolute bollocks. Surely defenders should be allowed to be defenders? When a defender is under extreme pressure and has no other option available, he should be allowed the safety of the boundary line!