Cricket Question

Remove this Banner Ad

carlton1995

Draftee
Oct 10, 2015
9
2
AFL Club
Carlton
Hi All,

Just a quick question for people that know their cricket well. If a batsman faces a no-ball or wide, does that delivery get counted towards their deliveries faced?

E.g. A batsman's first delivery faced is a wide, is he still 0 off 0? or now 0 off 1? Does this change between a no-ball or wide?

Does that change if a batter scores a run off the illegal delivery?
E.g. If the batter hits his first delivery for a boundary and its a no-ball. Is he 4 off 0? Or 4 off 1?

Any links to rules or anything explaining this would also be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Hi All,

Just a quick question for people that know their cricket well. If a batsman faces a no-ball or wide, does that delivery get counted towards their deliveries faced?

E.g. A batsman's first delivery faced is a wide, is he still 0 off 0? or now 0 off 1? Does this change between a no-ball or wide?

Does that change if a batter scores a run off the illegal delivery?
E.g. If the batter hits his first delivery for a boundary and its a no-ball. Is he 4 off 0? Or 4 off 1?

Any links to rules or anything explaining this would also be appreciated.

Thanks!

A legal ball has yet to be bowled. So if the batsmen has scored runs of it. (like a boundary)

He is 4 runs of 0 deliveries. Only legal deliveries counts towards a batsmen balls faced.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Since a wide is called because it can't be scored off, it does not count to the batsman's balls faced. However, a No Ball will, as even though it's not a legal delivery, the batsman still had the opportunity to score off it.
 
Ok well I learned something here. The weird thing about it is we probably don't notice that the balls faced by batsmen usually exceed 300 in an odi innings for example. Funny that
 
Since a wide is called because it can't be scored off, it does not count to the batsman's balls faced. However, a No Ball will, as even though it's not a legal delivery, the batsman still had the opportunity to score off it.

Thank you for this. Did manage to find some information on this and you are indeed correct!
 
Not the same thing, but I was listening to some back episodes of Jarrod Kimber's podcast and apparently No Balls didn't count towards the bowler until fairly recently. Apparently Bob Willis' test average of 25 would actually have been 28 if all the no balls he bowled in his career were attributed to him!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top