Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING

[marty36]

Marty I have repeated a position that has not changed
You continue to tag and twist
I am not sure what you want, but your fellow crow has posted some sound advice

So make it clear instead of half baked answers, do you believe you will get PD for compo puck only meaning Adelaide won't match and there will be no other secondary deals between the clubs?

 

[Mahlepi]

I don't care it's an anonymous Internet forum, if you didn't know! Maybe that's why I laugh a lot on it I find it hilarious!

Alex who do you think the crows are targeting with their danger pick

 

[1990crow]

Marty I have repeated a position that has not changed
You continue to tag and twist
I am not sure what you want, but your fellow crow has posted some sound advice

My post was mostly directed at people like you. Just making an observation about Marty's posting style to start with.

 

[Mahlepi]

So make it clear instead of half baked answers, do you believe you will get PD for compo puck only meaning Adelaide won't match and there will be no other secondary deals between the clubs?

Marty we will get danger because you will not match, ie as a Rfa. That simple Enough for you.

 

[fpm84]

http://bit.ly/1Of4fmr

Officially the Cats can offer him a free agency deal from this Friday to Sunday October 18, but the clubs could instead broker a pure trade from next Monday on.

The Cats believe Adelaide won’t match their bid, but if they do have to give up picks and players it would still be worth whatever the cost is.

 

[marty36]

Alex who do you think the crows are targeting with their danger pick

hahaha I don't think so mate, I told you some people take it seriously

 

[BunjiMac]

http://bit.ly/1Of4fmr

Officially the Cats can offer him a free agency deal from this Friday to Sunday October 18, but the clubs could instead broker a pure trade from next Monday on.

The Cats believe Adelaide won’t match their bid, but if they do have to give up picks and players it would still be worth whatever the cost is.

My guy feel tells me Adelaide wont match either.

I would love nothing more than to be proven wrong on this.

 

[adelaidecrows]

My post was mostly directed at people like you. Just making an observation about Marty's posting style to start with.

We just ignore it, hopefully it removes itself

 

[marty36]

http://bit.ly/1Of4fmr

Officially the Cats can offer him a free agency deal from this Friday to Sunday October 18, but the clubs could instead broker a pure trade from next Monday on.

The Cats believe Adelaide won’t match their bid, but if they do have to give up picks and players it would still be worth whatever the cost is.

That's a classic two conflicting answers in one statement

 

[marty36]

Marty we will get danger because you will not match, ie as a Rfa. That simple Enough for you.

And no secondary deal will be done?

 

[Elite Crow]

Mate I've said we will trade whether we match or not I have stipulated it won't matter I think the trade will be done without a match but will also be done with a match, whether it's a secondary trade or not. We won't be trading a ruck so I don't give a shit where you get a ruck from. If there is a secondary trade with a compo pick it's a trades you have been friggen adamant of no trade what so ever so don't try and backtrack. Hey Elite Crow can you believe this shit

Actually I can believe it, he's trolling and has since this shit started

 

[Elite Crow]

http://bit.ly/1Of4fmr

Officially the Cats can offer him a free agency deal from this Friday to Sunday October 18, but the clubs could instead broker a pure trade from next Monday on.

The Cats believe Adelaide won’t match their bid, but if they do have to give up picks and players it would still be worth whatever the cost is.

The Cats believe we won't but then you say giving up picks and players will be worth it. So why won't we match then?

 

[threefa9]

Mahlepi are you Frank Costa?

 

[Elite Crow]

Fair enough - but I'll disagree with people's comments. I won't attack people's character (i.e. sycophants). Maybe I'll go too far with things that happen repeatedly (400kay, "PlayStation trade", Ottens/McKay) but mostly I'll have a crack at someone's actual post.

You've never passed a judgement on someone's character that you didn't agree with? You sure about that?

 

[1990crow]

The Cats believe we won't but then you say giving up picks and players will be worth it. So why won't we match then?

Because deep down he knows it's what will happen.

 

[fpm84]

The Cats believe we won't but then you say giving up picks and players will be worth it. So why won't we match then?

Who are you talking to? I was quoting an article by Jon Ralph. He has obviously been talking to someone at Geelong who has reason to think the offer won't be matched.

 

[MRB37]

My guy feel tells me Adelaide wont match either.

I would love nothing more than to be proven wrong on this.

Why?

 

[marty36]

Who are you talking to? I was quoting an article by Jon Ralph. He has obviously been talking to someone at Geelong who has reason to think the offer won't be matched.

The article is conflicting it says Geelong won't match but then says if they do.

You can't take a bet both ways can you?

 

[fpm84]

The article is conflicting it says Geelong won't match but then says if they do.

You can't take a bet both ways can you?

The key bit of the article is that Geelong believes Adelaide won't match.

The rest of the sentence is Ralph's opinion - that if we do have to trade, Danger is worth it. You won't find a Geelong supporter who disagrees with that, though of course we would prefer to keep our picks and players if possible.

Ralph has obviously been talking to someone/several people at Geelong to know that the club is not expecting the deal to be matched. He was one of the first reporters to say on the record that Danger would be a Cat in 2016, earlier this season.

 

[marty36]

The key bit of the article is that Geelong believes Adelaide won't match.

The rest of the sentence is Ralph's opinion - that if we do have to trade, Danger is worth it. You won't find a Geelong supporter who disagrees with that, though of course we would prefer to keep our picks and players if possible.

Ralph has obviously been talking to someone/several people at Geelong to know that the club is not expecting the deal to be matched. He was one of the first reporters to say on the record that Danger would be a Cat in 2016, earlier this season.

Oh is it similar to Robo's article saying PD has advised he will go to the draft and take a one year deal.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Mahlepi are you Frank Costa?

No, he is hutchy.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Who are you talking to? I was quoting an article by Jon Ralph. He has obviously been talking to someone at Geelong who has reason to think the offer won't be matched.

Perhaps Ralph the mouth should try noting what Afc have to say on the matter as their decision not gfc's....

 

[marty36]

The key bit of the article is that Geelong believes Adelaide won't match.

The rest of the sentence is Ralph's opinion - that if we do have to trade, Danger is worth it. You won't find a Geelong supporter who disagrees with that, though of course we would prefer to keep our picks and players if possible.

Ralph has obviously been talking to someone/several people at Geelong to know that the club is not expecting the deal to be matched. He was one of the first reporters to say on the record that Danger would be a Cat in 2016, earlier this season.

Oh so did you ask him which statement that was made came from Geelong as it was in the one sentence. Maybe put his phone number up so we can ask him if that's what he meant to say also?

 

[I Lost My Keays]

People have rocks in their head , if they actually think we won't match.

 

[Mahlepi]

Will this thread still be open if the crows don't match?
Genuine question