Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING

[CutAboveTheRest]

He's a much better option , has a bit if speed , power and size

I wasnt having a dig at Murdoch

 

[dude316]

how did murdoch go this season, if included in a package would he clearly be in our best 22?

can you fit him and menzel in the 22?

We made room for vb and Mackay

 

[ijaxcat]

This thread is not about your list or best 22

Move on

If you persist in talking about another teams list and making assertions therein, surely it is perfectly legitimate to
supply a differing view and to point out why you are incorrect.

 

[Draft Bored]

Fair enough. That's your opinion. Geelong supporters will point to the fact that we already have a number of very talented first round picks learning their trade (Lang, Thurlow, Cockatoo) and improving players like Duncan, Caddy, Guthrie, Motlop and Blicavs who are all between 60-120 games and play key roles for us.

We had fewer players in the 25-28 year age bracket than anyone else this season so it's no surprise the three players we've been heavily linked to (Danger, Henderson, S.Selwood) fit this bill.

I don't expect Adelaide supporters to have an indepth knowledge of our list as I don't with yours. But I'm very confident in our sub-150 gamers and believe we will rocket back up the ladder in 2016 with some experienced recruits and a better run with injuries (this year was our worst run with injuries for almost a decade).

You've convinced me Geelong will be decent next year and as a result your first rounder in 2016 has been severely downgraded in my eyes.

I want more than 2 firsts now.

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

If you persist in talking about another teams list and making assertions therein, surely it is perfectly legitimate to
supply a differing view and to point out why you are incorrect.

I've warned you, I said if you had an issue PM me however you have chose to ignore me

This is not the Geelong list mgt thread I cant be any clearer

Last chance..... Stop this or you will receive a ban

 

[ijaxcat]

Known facts are that you missed the 8

Some of your best and most experienced players have retired

You have players like Clark and Vardy who are injury prone

And your list profile especially quality players in the 24-28 yrs age group is a concern

They are the facts now move on, this thread os not about your shitty list

Not to mention I your list was so great you wouldn't be trying to poach Danger, Henderson, Selwood and Z Smith from other clubs

How about developing your own

Quality post,and you are a moderator! You continue to ignorantly comment on the Geelong list. Then you supply your so called
facts which are totally wrong and then want to shut down the discussion.
You are a joke!

 

[KennyP#42]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

Quality post,and you are a moderator! You continue to ignorantly comment on the Geelong list. Then you supply your so called
facts which are totally wrong and then want to shut down the discussion.
You are a joke!

You and your fellow posters were warned and I invited you to PM me to discuss however you chose to continue to criticise in the open forum

It was a very simple request

1. Do not continue to discuss you list here

2. If you had a issue with this take I off line and PM me

You continued to ignore, showed lack of respect and continued to question me as a Mod

Good bye

 

[TheLeftFist8]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

Do you understand the concept that as soon as we match an offer he is no longer a free agent?!

 

[Draft Bored]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

You clearly don't.

Once a RESTRICTED free agent offer is matched by their current team, the player can either stay OR ask to be traded.

If they ask to be traded it's no different to the Adam Treloar situation (contract expires, asks to be traded). The fact that he was previously a RFA has no significance.

 

[Elite Crow]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

If it's restricted its the same as trading any quality player. Port got 2 first picks for Burgoyne

 

[Wood_Duck]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

You came here for that?

 

[The Sloane Ranger]

To all Cats fans

Warning again.....

Zero.tollwrance on this board for

1. Trolling

2. Insulting Adelaide posters

3. Hijacking the thread and turning it into a Geelong list or FC dicussion

4. Ignoring requests from Mods

Bans will be handed out to those who continue to ignore

 

[Paladin]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

Do you understand free agency champ? Once a RFA has a contract matched they are no longer a free agent. Just a regular uncontracted player or superstar in Dangers case.

Do you need further assistance?

 

[KennyP#42]

Do you understand the concept that as soon as we match an offer he is no longer a free agent?!

My point exactly... And therefore anything you get that is better than the priority pick should be jumped at

 

[billy fragos]

Why would we accept pick 10 (in a crappy draft), a random pick next year and some fringe player for Dangerfield?

Collingwood got pick 5 and pick 25 (in a good draft) and Jack crisp who is a superb talent for Beams when he wanted to go home, danger is much better than him.

Although for Geelong supporters it's easy to use I don't think "but he wants to go home" is a viable excuse for a lesser trade when they negotiate deals. Once we match we have the advantage.

 

[Miss Vanessa]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

I just posted this on the Geelong board too. It's a handy flow chart outlining the ins and outs of free agency.

http://www.aflplayers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2013-Free-Agency-Infograhpic.pdf

 

[Wood_Duck]

My point exactly... And therefore anything you get that is better than the priority pick should be jumped at

What would you want for Rockliffe?

Now double it.

 

[lunacy]

How can certain people entertain the idea of two first round picks + a player.... Do you understand the concept of free agency?
Brisbane paid pick 5, pick 25 & a player for beams - whilst I acknowledge danger is a bit above beams.... Surely anything the crows get above the compo pick should be viewed as favourable and a bonus?

Ooh that's an embarrassing post.

 

[Elite Crow]

Why would we accept pick 10 (in a crappy draft), a random pick next year and some fringe player for Dangerfield?

Collingwood got pick 5 and pick 25 (in a good draft) and Jack crisp who is a superb talent for Beams when he wanted to go home, danger is much better than him.

Although for Geelong supporters it's easy to use I don't think "but he wants to go home" is a viable excuse for a lesser trade when they negotiate deals. Once we match we have the advantage.

Problem is Geelong don't hold a pick lower than 9 and they are not going to get one

 

[TheLeftFist8]

My point exactly... And therefore anything you get that is better than the priority pick should be jumped at

 

[KennyP#42]

What would you want for Rockliffe?

Now double it.

Rockliffe would be similar to beams... Both best and fairest winners... So you would accept two first rounders, two second rounders and two players for danger?
Wow your bnf award must be prestigious

 

[TheLeftFist8]

How about 9 + Motlop + Murdoch for Danger and 3rd rounder.

 

[TheLeftFist8]

Rockliffe would be similar to beams... Both best and fairest winners... So you would accept two first rounders, two second rounders and two players for danger?
Wow your bnf award must be prestigious

If you can't see that Dangerfield's value is >>> Rockliff then you just don't football.

 

[Draft Bored]

Rockliffe would be similar to beams... Both best and fairest winners... So you would accept two first rounders, two second rounders and two players for danger?
Wow your bnf award must be prestigious

20 posts...

Troll. Get out.