Certified Legendary Thread David Mackay PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE

[Deaneus!]

this is the anti-chooklotto tribunal thread, designed to demonstrate how corrupt the tribunal is

the anti-David Mackay

14

David Mackay

Age

35

Ht

181cm

Wt

78kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

17.0

4star

K

9.2

4star

HB

7.7

5star

M

3.2

3star

T

3.2

5star

MG

315.4

4star

D

16.5

4star

K

7.0

3star

HB

9.5

5star

M

2.5

3star

T

2.0

3star

MG

265.5

4star

D

12.0

3star

K

6.2

3star

HB

5.8

4star

M

4.6

5star

T

1.2

3star

thread is here:

The David Mackay thread

https://www.afc.com.au/news/2019-09-27/new-deals-for-mackay-and-strachan “David had one of his best seasons and his attitude, preparation and training standards are always first class,” Reid said. “We see him making a valuable contribution both on and off the field next year.”

www.bigfooty.com

please post accordingly

 

[Cap]

Just watch any game today. You'll probably see 100 collisions that might be considered line ball by someone. The AFL have an impossible job.

They'll only ever look at it based on out comes., so if there is an injury or a non Victorian club has an incident that the VFL media decide to talk about, it'll be looked at.

They don't have the leadership capacity to make a call on it from an action perspective (something David King kept referring too)

 

[feenix67]

Just watch any game today. You'll probably see 100 collisions that might be considered line ball by someone. The AFL have an impossible job.

The AFL have an easy job, until they complicate it for themselves with this sort of bullshit.

 

[Vhaluus]

judging by outcome was and will always be a completely flawed way of determining severity.

 

[FR0GGY]

judging by outcome was and will always be a completely flawed way of determining severity.

Outcome should just be a multiplier when the action is intentional.

 

[GreyCrow]

If it is outcome based then tie it to the return of the injured player

 

[GreyCrow]

Outcome should just be a multiplier when the action is intentional.

There have been many back of the head punches that are more serious than Mackay bump -yet the AFL just fine

That is why the AFL are only paying lip service to concussion

 

[Crowbots are dead]

So the question that I want someone to ask idiot hocking is what exactly should McKay have done differently for it to be from the AFL eyes? The only answer can be that he shirk the contest ! The AFL position is untenable. What is the game coming too?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

So the question that I want someone to ask idiot hocking is what exactly should McKay have done differently for it to be from the AFL eyes? The only answer can be that he shirk the contest ! The AFL position is untenable. What is the game coming too?

sHocking said he would send a similar incident straight to the tribunal again this week. Does he not understand the concept of a precedent?!

Bottom line is he clearly is unfit to continue in his role as only a complete moron would seek to make players guilty for accidents.

 

[Faaarrk]

This is from the Wikipedia page of Steve Hocking.
I hope no-one ever changes it, it perfect and accurate.

In August 2017, Hocking was appointed AFL General Manager of Football Operations. Since his appointment Hocking has set about destroying the game of AFL as it’s known. Jumping at shadows and changing the rules with massive over corrections for incidental incidents that occur, has become the main feature of the legacy of incompetence he is building.

 

[Deaneus!]

there you are Mr Hocking, do something about s**t like that

 

[rocket18]

I’m just wondering what the AFL will do when a player launches himself sideways or backwards for a mark - the sort of thing that’s usually seen as very brave, eyes only for the ball, “no thought for his own safety” - and takes out an oppo player who is injured in the contact.

Unreasonable to do that? Surely he knew or was negligent in not realizing that injury could occur?

This is the hole sHocking has dug himself, the fool should be sacked.

 

[rocket18]

So yes or no to knees in the back of the head for marks?

You wont get an answer, none of the people who think along these lines are prepared to extend the same thinking to marking contests because their argument collapses.

 

[Scorpus]

Joel Selwood has always been a disgrace to the game. A dirty player, a cheat, and a flog

 

[mattymac]

there you are Mr Hocking, do something about sh*t like that

What a s**t campaigner

 

[Bearded Clam]

there you are Mr Hocking, do something about sh*t like that

Wow.. what a dog act..

how *in gutless are you to drop a couple of jabs into someones head when they are being held down by one of your team mates.

Selwoods a flog

 

[Deaneus!]

Wow.. what a dog act..

how fu**in gutless are you to drop a couple of jabs into someones head when they are being held down by one of your team mates.

Selwoods a flog

Selwood’s always been a flog

Remember when he eye gouged Knight?

Ducked at every opportunity

No respect for. Mr Gutless

 

[FR0GGY]

Wow.. what a dog act..

how fu**in gutless are you to drop a couple of jabs into someones head when they are being held down by one of your team mates.

Selwoods a flog

He stomped on Durays leg last night too when getting up.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

there you are Mr Hocking, do something about sh*t like that

He’d just ordered a chicko roll so will get off.

 

[Faaarrk]

Wow.. what a dog act..

how fu**in gutless are you to drop a couple of jabs into someones head when they are being held down by one of your team mates.

Selwoods a flog

I thought he was trying to rub grass/ dirt into his eyes.
Grubbier act.

 

[jackster83]

Selwood’s always been a flog

Remember when he eye gouged Knight?

Ducked at every opportunity

No respect for. Mr Gutless

The game will be better for him retiring. Piece of s**t.

 

[FR0GGY]

The game will be better for him retiring. Piece of sh*t.

The silly thing is he could be everything he is without his dirty s**t.
Wouldn’t take away from his game one bit.

 

[Moonwatcher]

there you are Mr Hocking, do something about sh*t like that

It doesn't tarnish his reputation, it IS his reputation.

 

[Moonwatcher]

The silly thing is he could be everything he is without his dirty sh*t.
Wouldn’t take away from his game one bit.

He'd probably win half as many one on ones.

 

[Moonwatcher]

Selwood’s always been a flog

Remember when he eye gouged Knight?

Ducked at every opportunity

No respect for. Mr Gutless

That's the only thing I think about when his name is mentioned.

 

[John Who]

That’s why I don’t think they need to try with contests.
If someone else has the ball and you do something, you’re liable.
When it’s a contest, it’s part of the game.
As soon as we take that out, as hocking tried to do this week, then it’s time to make it non contact, if they want to remove any chance of accidental head knocks.

Imagine telling boxers you can still give someone a KO, but there has to be a “duty of care” where they don’t end up with jaw dislocations or broken jaws...

Hocking/AFL heads are complete twits for passing this through to the tribunal!