Dean Cox or Mitch Clark?

[Axel.]

Dean Cox or Mitch Clark?

Both are pretty similar IMO. Who would you choose?

 

[Donakebab]

Stupid poll. One is the premier ruckman in the competition, the other just had a break out year. Cox by a mile.

 

[Frothies Mcveigh]

Yeah i agree Cox easily.

 

[Schulzenfest]

Cox, but IMO only narrowly. I'd have Sandi as the No. 1 ruckman in the comp, Cox at 2 and Clark at 3.

 

[SunKing]

Cox just at this moment but Clark in the future if he stays in the ruck position.

Not that much between them though.

 

[bzparkes]

Cox just at this moment but Clark in the future if he stays in the ruck position.

Not that much between them though.

Yeah, only about 4 AA's

 

[Axel.]

Yeah, only about 4 AA's

Well he should have been AA this year.

 

[wirra44]

Well he should have been AA this year.

A thing called injury in which he only played 13 games

 

[Axel.]

A thing called injury in which he only played 13 games

I meant Mitch Clark should have gotten AA.

 

[DrTomSwift]

I meant Mitch Clark should have gotten AA.

What because he was better than Sandi? Get real. And no they shouldn't have a back up spot.

 

[Axel.]

What because he was better than Sandi? Get real. And no they shouldn't have a back up spot.

Yes Clark had a better year then Sandi.

Sandi may have gotten more hit outs but overall Clark was better.

 

[Donakebab]

Not a chance Clark had a better year then Sandilands. Only a Brisbane supporter who can't see passed their blatantly biased opinion would think otherwise.

Clark is a gun prospect, but there is no way he's the premier ruckman in the competition.

 

[Axel.]

Not a chance Clark had a better year then Sandilands. Only a Brisbane supporter who can't see passed their blatantly biased opinion would think otherwise.

Clark is a gun prospect, but there is no way he's the premier ruckman in the competition.

Aaron Sandilands

Mitchell Clark

Stats are pretty similar imo.

 

[weagles_fan]

For the future (3-4+ years) you would pick Clark but for the next 2 years and over careers so far Cox.

 

[dajesmac]

I have no idea how Clark has six votes, I mean sure they may not be a massive difference between them but I don't know how anyone could possibly think about it and come to the conclusion that Clark is better...

 

[chopper41]

Come back when Clark has proven himself. Until then, he's not even close.

 

[Ruse]

Come back when Clark has proven himself. Until then, he's not even close.

I take it you didn't watch a single lions game this year then?

 

[CrazyQ]

Cox is a lot better with more experience and has played way more better games.

That isn't an insult to Clark, but Cox is a champ.

 

[Notorious_29]

Would take Cox easily over Mitch "I sit in the backline and take cheap marks all day long" Clark.

 

[chopper41]

I take it you didn't watch a single lions game this year then?

One season doesn't prove a player. That was my point. Cox has proven that he is an elite footballer. Clark did have a very good season but it's only one season. He has to do it over 2 or 3 years before he proves that he's for real.

 

[wavefall21]

Cox easily

 

[Schulzenfest]

Would take Cox easily over Mitch "I sit in the backline and take cheap marks all day long" Clark.

This is one of the stupidest posts I've ever seen.

 

[Notorious_29]

This is one of the stupidest posts I've ever seen.

I know , I was hoping some lions fans would arch up.

There was about a 2 week argument before the AA team was announced on the ruck position to be filled between Clark and Sandilands. This was the flog one liner used for a while.

But seriously Clarks future looks promising, I'd still take Cox though.

 

[EagleMan87]

Well he should have been AA this year.

Essendon supporters said the same about Hille last year. Not saying that Clarke didn't have a great year, but Sandilands was better.

 

[Axel.]

Essendon supporters said the same about Hille last year. Not saying that Clarke didn't have a great year, but Sandilands was better.

How can he get AA when no one even knows his name.