Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Draft thread - 2025 (remaining picks: 29, 34)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Live draft hand
R1: 1 (Duursma), 4 (CDT), 19 (Lindsay)
R2: 29, 34
RD: 1

Draft picks pre-draft
R1: 1, 2, 13
R2: 34, 41
RD: 1

List spots available
Main list: 2 (includes Duursma, CDT, Lindsay)
Cat A Rookie list: 1 (expecting Robertson, Macrae and Schoenberg to join as SSP signings)
Cat B Rookie list: 1

Draft order

Draft prospect video highlights (thanks to noobermensch)

Rookie Me Central 2025 Draft Guide


Matthew Clarke on Gettable 17/11


Cal Twomey’s Phantom Draft

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I can't find any reference online to CDT being taller than 200cm. Someone get Clarke over there with a tape measure
 
If Archie is correct and he’s now 204cm you can almost guarantee he’ll be taken at pick 2, regardless of which club has the pick.

Would love an X-Ray of his growth plates to get a guide of what height he projects to being.
So this is where he might be considered a pick 1 by some clubs, over duursma.

Replacement for
Blues a TDK and Curnow
Dees a gawn and key forward
Dons a draper and 2m Peter.

This is where we need to decide, do we want midfielders or not. Walking away with the top 2 picks and not taking a mid would be as dumb as you can get.

We have to accept for our list balance losing one of duursma or CDT has to happen.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If Archie is correct and he’s now 204cm you can almost guarantee he’ll be taken at pick 2, regardless of which club has the pick.

Would love an X-Ray of his growth plates to get a guide of what height he projects to being.
If he is 204 cm, I am excited. Dons and Dees will want him more and the price war starts in earnest. Maybe even Tigers

My preference would Dons with 5+6 for 2+13. We then get to address our midfield with Sharp and Cumming. If the CDT competition becomes fierce, then we can drop the need for 13 going back and offer 33 + 41 + Saints F2. Decide on the day as to using 13 or banking into 2026.

Dees 7+8 has nothing but 41 going back. But we run the risk of not getting only 1 of the mids I rate in that early bracket. Here’s a left field option, go 2+13 for 7+8+Dees F1. We spread the drafting of elite mids out over 2 years. We would still walk away with Duursma, Cumming or Sharp and Schubert or Dovaston. Drafting Banfield this year along with Dev and the natural development of Gross, Hall and Allan would allow taking 2 top Enders next year. Do Dees stay bottom 4, get worse or move up. It would be some ride next year.

Then the Tigers want 2 for 4+F2. It woul give Duursma + Sharp or Cumming plus who we get at 13 and more value in 2026. It could also give us more options to get up to 9 with Blues.
 
Last edited:
Some creative thinking here. I don't see us trading down from 1 & 2 and it probably won't be because we're not interested, it's that we won't be satisfied with any offers.

I think Richmond are comfortable and won't be moved from picks 3&4, they're not motivated.

Melbourne are really too far down the board to be relevant to us, maybe if they offered up a GC F1 as part of the mix.

And essendon will want more than pick 1 for 5 & 6 given there recent antics, I don't see us moving 2 & 13 to 5 & 6 because Essendon will want Duursma.
 
Early 2 round mock draft with pre-draft and live trades. Only final order. Happy to explain some of the bid matching and trades to arrive at the final result as well as some very notable omissions and sliders :)

View attachment 2460159
Do you think we would actually take what is 5 mids with our first 5 picks?
edit:nvm saw your other comment

The trades are interesting, I like ending up with 4 and 5
 
Very poor trade for us

Agree with the higher likelihood that anyone who trades up for 2 will be doing so to beat out their competitors for Robey.

Don’t think Richmond being Taylor here. Just let Young go as a talented KPD due to depth. Drafted Trainor last year. Think they go CDT or the next bpa midfielder here. Or trade for future capital.

The reason why if we move 2 it has to be for 5 or at least 6, grabbing sharp is a must if we don’t stick and pick at 2.

Will be traded

Have come to the conclussion 5 doesn't guarantee Sharp. 7 and 8 we likely miss both.

5 very likely gets one of either Sharp or Cumming IMO.

So in essence splitting 2 if we desperately want Sharp needs to be 3 or 4. A trade with Richmond who want CDT.

A trade for 5 and 6 is a gamble on Sharp.

But we could land Sharp and Cumming. Or one PLUS Dovaston.

1. Duursma
5. Sharp / Cumming
6. Cumming / Dovaston

And I don't see Dovaston as just a small forward.

All depends on how desperate we are to get Sharp.

I'd be rapt with Duursma, either one plus Dovaston.
 
Last edited:
Some creative thinking here. I don't see us trading down from 1 & 2 and it probably won't be because we're not interested, it's that we won't be satisfied with any offers.

I think Richmond are comfortable and won't be moved from picks 3&4, they're not motivated.

Melbourne are really too far down the board to be relevant to us, maybe if they offered up a GC F1 as part of the mix.

And essendon will want more than pick 1 for 5 & 6 given there recent antics, I don't see us moving 2 & 13 to 5 & 6 because Essendon will want Duursma.

Yeah I'm leaning back towards hoping we don't split and just taking Duursma/Sharp with 1&2. General feel seems to be Sharp is back up to being thereabouts with CDT in that draft range.

It will be a shame to miss Cumming but I don't see a scenario anymore where we can get all 3 of Duursma/Sharp/Cumming.
 
Some creative thinking here. I don't see us trading down from 1 & 2 and it probably won't be because we're not interested, it's that we won't be satisfied with any offers.

I think Richmond are comfortable and won't be moved from picks 3&4, they're not motivated.

Melbourne are really too far down the board to be relevant to us, maybe if they offered up a GC F1 as part of the mix.

And essendon will want more than pick 1 for 5 & 6 given there recent antics, I don't see us moving 2 & 13 to 5 & 6 because Essendon will want Duursma.

Essendon want CDT.

CDT wants Essendon.

They made their stand. How much do they want their man?
 
Have come ro the conclussion 5 doesn't guarantee Sharp. 7 and 8 we likely miss both.

5 very likely gets one of either Sharp or Cumming IMO.

So in essence splitting 2 if we desperately want Sharp needs to be 3 or 4. A trade with Richmond who want CDT.

A trade for 5 and 6 is a gamble on Sharp.

But we could land Sharp and Cumming. Or one PLUS Dovaston.

1. Duursma
5. Sharp / Cumming
6. Cumming / Dovaston

And I don't see Dovaston as just a small forward.

All depends on how desperate we are to get Sharp.

I'd be rapt with Duursma, either one plus Dovaston.
Depending on whether a trade up to 2 is predicated on taking CDT or Robey, we are left with Sharp + Cumming if the prior, or possibly Sharp / CDT + Cumming if the latter. I’d be very happy with both.

Edit: this is assuming a draft order of the following

Duursma
CDT / Robey
CDT / Robey / Sharp
Grlj
CDT / Robey / Sharp
Cumming
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Grundy and jackson who CDT is compared to as underage rucks where utterly dominant as juniors its too much of a risk we dont need anymore utility types or projects on this stage of the rebiuld
CDT reminds me of Ethan Read as an underager TBH. Good athletic profile but not particularly dominant in any position at any level he played this year, except for perhaps school football, a level I couldn't care less about in my assessment of draftees.
 
Depending on whether a trade up to 2 is predicated on taking CDT or Robey, we are left with Sharp + Cumming if the prior, or possibly Sharp / CDT + Cumming if the latter. I’d be very happy with both.

Edit: this is assuming a draft order of the following

Duursma
CDT / Robey
CDT / Robey / Sharp
Grlj
CDT / Robey / Sharp
Cumming

I'm still on the trade 2 plus something for 5 and 6.

We get Duursma.

We then get a crack at two more top 5 players not just one with perceived limitations.
 
So no update on Closely Geelong mid OOC?

Read we offered 3 years.

May need to be PSD or as a DFA if it happens.


Gold Coast only finalised their delistings yesterday, so we need to see if he chooses to join his brother there or take up our offer.

Would be thrilled if he decided to join us.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Some creative thinking here. I don't see us trading down from 1 & 2 and it probably won't be because we're not interested, it's that we won't be satisfied with any offers.

I think Richmond are comfortable and won't be moved from picks 3&4, they're not motivated.

Melbourne are really too far down the board to be relevant to us, maybe if they offered up a GC F1 as part of the mix.

And essendon will want more than pick 1 for 5 & 6 given there recent antics, I don't see us moving 2 & 13 to 5 & 6 because Essendon will want Duursma.
Ah, but Essendon also learnt that if you really really want something, then the buyer needs to really really pay up. And get the best foot forward early.

Would they do 1+33 for 5+6. With their R2 picks then they have Blues picks in sight.
 
Gold Coast only finalised their delistings yesterday, so we need to see if he chooses to join his brother there or take up our offer.

Would be thrilled if he decided to join us.

Yep, recall that now too. :thumbsu:

We surely can offer better opportunity and dollars than the Suns.

They are brimming with 1st round talent.

Just get Dev to give him a call.

Just needs to ask himself, does he want to play VFL or AFL?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting that clip.

It's a good reminder for all the CDT lovers that tell us that he reminds of them of Luke Jackson.

There are at least three significant points of difference between LJ and CDT:

1. One can take an overhead contested mark.
2. One can jump.
3. One wins ruck knocks and feeds his midfielders.

There are more than those three aspects of the game that distinguish the strengths and weakness of the two players, but thats the three most critical points of difference.
4. wasn't even top 2 pick worthy :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top