- Dec 14, 2008
- 19,857
- 32,355
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Maybe....aylett was placed on the rookie list, because he was told that fletch may retire mid season/post 400 and he'd be back in?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Big difference between eligible and likely to be picked. We'll be lucky if one is good enoughMy mistake - was under the impression three were eligible.
Not sure what you mean by slips through to the rookie draft? every player going from senior list to rookie list has to be done through the draft.The club and player X agree that the player will drop to the rookie list. Player X disagrees, contacts his Manager, fish for offers and then player X asks to be delisted. Switch from primary list to rookie list only happens with player consent - hence why the player slips through to the rookie draft.
Fantasia got played for a couple of games to fill a perceived need, much like Kav did the year before. It means nothing about his chances of game time this coming year. Gleeson came in for a player out on an extended absence and held up the position reasonably well. Just because he did enough to keep getting games didn't mean he came back in automatically later on the in the year. If Howlett or Myers had been injured around the time that Aylett really hit form then Aylett could well have ended up with a similar count to Gleeson for the year... I might be stretching the concept a little, but my point is that timing and filling needs, dictates who gets promoted more than any other factor.
In short i keep an open mind about concept that Gleeson is going to be a star while the likes of Aylett warranted demotion.
Maybe....aylett was placed on the rookie list, because he was told that fletch may retire mid season/post 400 and he'd be back in?
If Wright was to do a Brodie Grundy and slide from being a top end pick to a late teens pick, do you think we would consider him with #17 if he slid that far?
It'd need a live boy/dead girl sort of scenario for that to happen.If Wright was to do a Brodie Grundy and slide from being a top end pick to a late teens pick, do you think we would consider him with #17 if he slid that far?
There is zero chance of it happening but if it did we'd be stupid not to at the very least seriously consider him.If Wright was to do a Brodie Grundy and slide from being a top end pick to a late teens pick, do you think we would consider him with #17 if he slid that far?
Miller I like, probably a late 2nd round pick. McKenzie I don't like, has no flexibility about where he can play.
There would be no consideration because this is never going to happen.There is zero chance of it happening but if it did we'd be stupid not to at the very least seriously consider him.
That's not true, Lloyd always had the ability to play further up the ground, and the game has changed a lot since his retirement. Flexibility is king in the AFL nowadays. McKenzie will be no better than Daniher or Carlisle out of the square, but severely restricts them playing in the same side.Wasn't much of a problem for Lloyd.
McKenzie is listed as a forward / ruck. Guess anyone that tall is automatically considered a ruckman.
Not sure what you mean by slips through to the rookie draft? every player going from senior list to rookie list has to be done through the draft.
Can someone please explain why people rate De Goey? His highlights package is pretty average compared to others. Cockatoo, Lamb and Miller for example.
That's not true, Lloyd always had the ability to play further up the ground, and the game has changed a lot since his retirement. Flexibility is king in the AFL nowadays. McKenzie will be no better than Daniher or Carlisle out of the square, but severely restricts them playing in the same side.
Big bodied mid, good kick, goal scorer.Can someone please explain why people rate De Goey? His highlights package is pretty average compared to others. Cockatoo, Lamb and Miller for example.
Can someone please explain why people rate De Goey? His highlights package is pretty average compared to others. Cockatoo, Lamb and Miller for example.
I would rather someone like Keitel. He's going to be better than McKenzie and is far more flexible than him. I can't see McKenzie making it, he's simply too limited in what he can do.I see your point but the need for a consistent lead up forward is to great at the moment.
I'm sure we can teach the kid a few more tricks.
I believe Carlisle is an excellent defender. He should be moved down back where he can dominate and influence games on a weekly basis. As a forward he's to inconsistent.
If McKenzie can pair up with Joey, that allows Carlisle to go down back and with Fletcher's retirement at the end of the season, it could be timely.
View attachment 90353
hooker looking trim! tbell could use a few shirt buttons, we paying him enough?