Madness101
All Australian
Yeo's tackle is at 2.47
Darlings contact starts at 5.05
Thoughts ?
( I didn't make this purely because we play West Coast next week)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Completely different.Neither are suspensions in my mind. Just football occurrences. That said, if NN got a week I'm thinking Yeo should.
The Joker?It's the worst thing I've seen since Allan grabbed Glen around the neck...
The Eagles are Filth...
Two Richmond posters in the first two comments, when we play them next week?im assuming this is purely a pisstake thread....but im never sure anymore
Perfectly normal tackle that Yeo was rewarded for.Why does WC keep trying to break the necks of their opponents? Very ordinary indeed...
Why does WC keep trying to break the necks of their opponents? Very ordinary indeed...
Completely different.
Shiel had both arms free, Yeo landed on his knees then rolled away, won a free kick.
Oh FFS. My first post said I don't think there's anything in there. Go check the NN thread and you'll find I didn't want him suspended either.Two Richmond posters in the first two comments, when we play them next week?
Not a pisstake just footy supporters being flogs.
Perfectly normal tackle that Yeo was rewarded for.
Why does WC keep trying to break the necks of their opponents? Very ordinary indeed...
The complaint levelled against NN, is different to the Yeo situation. Both arms free, Yeo fell to his knees, so did't drive him in to the turf and rolled away, so no in the back. Showed he tried to exercise any duty of care.It's not about what Yeo (or NN) did sometimes. It's about what happened to their opponent.
Oh FFS. My first post said I don't think there's anything in there. Go check the NN thread and you'll find I didn't want him suspended either.
This is my point - the NN tackle (IMHO) was perfectly normal too. It was a comment on the lottery that is the MRO.
That may be the case, but what will the MRO think? Did he exercise enough DoC? Just to be clear, we are in agreeance here. I'm commenting on the lottery that is the tribunal.The complaint levelled against NN, is different to the Yeo situation. Both arms free, Yeo fell to his knees, so did't drive him in to the turf and rolled away, so no in the back. Showed he tried to exercise any duty of care.
Yes, he definitely did. The commentators even noted it at the time. Compare also, in the back aganst NN, HTB against Shiel.That may be the case, but what will the MRO think? Did he exercise enough DoC? Just to be clear, we are in agreeance here. I'm commenting on the lottery that is the tribunal.
I've personally never had a go at WC, I'm just concerned about some of your tackles in recent times.So which one are you?
When will Port supporters stop grinding the axe with everything West Coast. Its getting pretty pathetic.
As is this thread. OP being a Tigers supporter says it all, even though he claims that isn't the reason. It's like starting with "Im not trolling but........"
And did you think that last week re: DoC?Yes, he definitely did. The commentators even noted it at the time. Compare also, in the back aganst NN, HTB against Shiel.
Dropped onto both knees, not drove through Shiel and rolled away from the tackle. If he is charged, it would be an easy challenge.
I think it was wrong, but all the weasely and incorrect ways that Christian tried to pin NN in the media don't apply. Yeo dropped to his knees, released Shiel and rolled away. Shiel had both arms free.And did you think that last week re: DoC?
Neither are suspensions in my mind. Just football occurrences. That said, if NN got a week I'm thinking Yeo should.
Neither are suspensions in my mind. Just football occurrences. That said, if NN got a week I'm thinking Yeo should.