Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The editorial stance however is extremely poor. All headlines, story placement, % of opinion pieces for and against are all heavily slanted towards the left. It is a media company heavily weighted towards online readership where most content is shared on social media, which slants heavily left, and thus produces alot of left-wing clickbait.
You know that you haven't demonstrated this at all, right?
I actually can't wait until Rupert Murdoch carks it and makes the world a better place. Manipulative evil old cretin.
His son might be even worse.
I heard that his son was less competent, though that could be wrong.
medusala did say that his daughter was fairly sharp though, IIRC.
His son is an ideological warrior.I heard that his son was less competent, though that could be wrong.
medusala did say that his daughter was fairly sharp though, IIRC.
A mere half a billion down the toilet.Well, there was the One.Tel fiasco.
What big business
Gee, I wonder if an article about "BIG BUSINESS" setting out its demands/expectations/wish-list is something that foments leftie outrage at corporations controlling politicians?
I'm not sure why this thread is really getting air time. The OP can't actually read English. There are clearly quotes around the Morrison is lying, but to the uneducated they have no idea what that is.
What?
Everything is biased against you then if a) it supports the opposition viewpoint or b) supports your viewpoint which only serves to reveal how toxic that viewpoint is.Read all the other examples presented in English. Read the explanation regarding the subtle bias used by SMH and how so in that example. There's no point you being a troll when there's plenty of other material here for you to sink your teeth into.
An article about "BIG BUSINESS" setting out its demands/expectations/wish-list is something that foments leftie outrage at corporations controlling politicians. Therefore, it's a left-wing article aimed at you, getting you angry, and you don't even realise it. lol.
This is the final nail in the coffin of this thread, but here is a an article full of unnamed business types scared of Labor's economic credentials.
It's PR for industry masquerading as journalism.
What big business won't say publicly about a Labor victory
Everything is biased against you then if a) it supports the opposition viewpoint or b) supports your viewpoint which only serves to reveal how toxic that viewpoint is.
I can see why you're perpetually outraged then
if a) it supports the opposition viewpoint or b) supports your viewpoint which only serves to reveal how toxic that viewpoint is.
So essentially they support the right unless its obvious labor / labour will win and then they get behind the winning side?Similar to Murdoch endorsing Blair, Rudd etc. They see the writing on the wall and pretend to be with the people.
You mean the big business that:Let me explain slowly...it reinforces and confirms Labor's running theme that "Big Business" is entitled and expects favours from Government. It's full of loaded language.
Gee some of you (all of you?) are not very good with your English skills and comprehension...
So essentially they support the right unless its obvious labor / labour will win and then they get behind the winning side?
You are upset that most of the time they support your side of politics but occasionally they bend with the hurricane and flip so they seem with it?
Erm no...you quoted my post where I said it was like how right-wing Murdoch swings behind an obvious left-wing victory (Rudd in 2007, Blair in 1997). Just as, I said, left-wing Fairfax had to swing behind an obvious right-wing victory (Abbott in 2013).
As I was saying about poor comprehension skills...
Would just love you to clarify how you think they arent entitled.
But what of Turnbull in 2016? His victory was far from obvious.