knightwheelrqr
Club Legend
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2009
- Posts
- 1,634
- Reaction score
- 2
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
Fraser would be very average as a target deep in the 50. Hell, in your initial post you specified that in 2002 he impressed across half forward. He's skinny, doesn't use his body well against good defenders, isn't aggressive, and is average over his head for his size as well. If he's a forward, he'll be a lead up forward.
As a forward I would use him more so to push up the ground, then once the ball be being "thrust" forward push back towards goal is how I would see him as being most dangerous and best used.
As a tall flanker if matched up on by bigger opponents he could very well run them off their feet and beat them through the middle of the ground and while playing on lesser sized opponents could certainly push deeper into the forwardline where he can beat them one on one.
With Jolly still playing 75-85% ruck time though. That would leave Wood forward. Fraser, Wood, Cloke and JA is a bit tall for my liking. Which is why I would still favor leaving Wood out of the 22 and having Fraser backup Jolly with limited rucking minutes. Not to say Wood isn't a quality ruck, but with Jolly the superior ruckman just don't see him getting enough time for his place in the side to really be viable.
But certainly this idea of having all 3 in the side naturally needs to be trialed in any case regardless of whether logically it will work or not.











