Simmonds2Hislop
Cancelled
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Posts
- 1,505
- Reaction score
- 14
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1
Do you think that free was there?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
bullshit. wet, slippery game where there is a hundred tackles, many similar with the tackled player's momentum going forward and the grandstanding umpires pluck one out with less than 2 minutes remaining. allowances must be made when it is slippery and players can't keep their feet.
Do you think that free was there?
Your poll is worthless and shit without accounting for bias from saints and cats fans.
What's the point in creating a poll where two of the three options are in favour of your agenda, as is your thread title?

Your poll is worthless and shit without accounting for bias from saints and cats fans.
Vote in the proper thread here:
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=751659
What's the point in creating a poll where two of the three options are in favour of your agenda, as is your thread title?

Yes it was definately there. I umpire footy and it goes by HOW the tackle was laid.Do you think that free was there?
How can you be robbed when they got an extra 5 points from a rushed behind?
Yes it was definately there. I umpire footy and it goes by HOW the tackle was laid.
The tackle was a tad aggressive. Correct decision.
NotSureIfSerious.jpg
Mooney did not kick that goal. 6 points for a goal (incorrect call) - 1 point for a rushed behind (correct call) = 5 point closer to St Kilda.
Which goal are we talking about?
I thought you meant St Kilda rushed a lot of behinds and hence deserved to win by more.
Mooney did not kick that goal. 6 points for a goal (incorrect call) - 1 point for a rushed behind (correct call) = 5 point closer to St Kilda.
Not sure how you could make a call either way - the video evidence was very inconclusive. Looked to me to clearly be two separate contacts and the goal ump was in the best position.The one that was given a goal when it was a rushed behind. Mooney claimed that he kicked it.
Not sure how you could make a call either way - the video evidence was very inconclusive. Looked to me to clearly be two separate contacts and the goal ump was in the best position.
As for people blaming Mooney for losing us the game - grow up. He executed a perfect tackle and only got penalised because Gwilt leant forward and forced him onto his back. Whether it is a free kick or not, it shouldn't be, especially not in the wet. It's no better than being penalised for a high tackle when someone ducks.[/quote]
Good point and you make sense, unfortunately however, in the land of AFL common sense does not prevail.
Not sure how you could make a call either way - the video evidence was very inconclusive. Looked to me to clearly be two separate contacts and the goal ump was in the best position.
As for people blaming Mooney for losing us the game - grow up. He executed a perfect tackle and only got penalised because Gwilt leant forward and forced him onto his back. Whether it is a free kick or not, it shouldn't be, especially not in the wet. It's no better than being penalised for a high tackle when someone ducks.
