Would be almost poetic if Scott has his last year at the club with Stanley still as our no.1 ruck. Then in 2023 we embark on a new dawn - new attacking coach with a new ruck/midfield set up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Would be even more poetic if his first and last years were flag years.Would be almost poetic if Scott has his last year at the club with Stanley still as our no.1 ruck. Then in 2023 we embark on a new dawn - new attacking coach with a new ruck/midfield set up.
What are you watching? Narkle cant get a gig in our midfield and neither can Paddy fu#@in Dow.LOL... C'mon man...
If Q. Narkle can get a GIG in our midfield then P.Dow is a walk up start.
If T. Atkins S. Higgins & O'Conner get a go in our midfield then P.Dow is an automatic selection.
Get on board... GiddyUp!!
Would be even more poetic if his first and last years were flag years.![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not if you are KimmieYou have a better chance of winning 3rd division in tattslotto.
Would be almost poetic if Scott has his last year at the club with Stanley still as our no.1 ruck. Then in 2023 we embark on a new dawn - new attacking coach with a new ruck/midfield set up.
Perhaps GWS would do Flynn or Briggs for Sav and our 2022r2.Rhys can play as the 3rd tall forward and backup ruckman. Trade Ratagolea.
Where did you read that?Scarlett and kelly didn’t get along? Didn’t know that.
You crazy.Perhaps GWS would do Flynn or Briggs for Sav and our 2022r2.
Or call me crazy, what about Mumford for one year.
Ladhams (autocorrect wanted “Lasagne”) would want to go somewhere where he is clear first banana. Won’t be here having just signed Rhys for two.
Perhaps GWS would do Flynn or Briggs for Sav and our 2022r2.
Or call me crazy, what about Mumford for one year.
I wonder how long do we have to wait to hear on what Henderson is doing...
This makes things interesting - Collingwood may not be able to get both through the preseason drafting, so who do they think they can get a trade done for if they can only trade for one and PSD the other?
Nothing wrong with Stanley as our no.1 ruck in 2022. He’s not Gawn (nobody is) but he’s a hell of a lot better than Martin/English, who made the GF. Only three years ago Lycett and Vardy smashed Grundy in the GF.
A couple of clubs are lucky to have generational rucks like Gawn and Naitanui. The rest of us need to make do with what we have - there is nobody on the market better than Stanley and he is not the reason we’ve failed to win a flag in his time at Geelong.
I think the criticisms that have been levelled at Scarlett are the same criticisms levelled at Sanderson when he was sacked from the crom. Tried to create a boys club clique. Saw himself as part of the playing group. Might have pulled his head in sinceKing is going to be a senior assistant at GC-seems like his wife has family up there so family reasons are coming into it.
I too would love Choco but unlikely.
I wouldnt mind Sando actually just not as a head coach..as a development coach he is fine.
You're correct but there's also no way you can write that into a one line memeAnd more to the point, hasn’t been. In the past five national drafts we have taken 23 selections. We will take another four selections this year. It is a core part of the list management strategy but seemingly very poorly understood.
And more to the point, hasn’t been. In the past five national drafts we have taken 23 selections. We will take another four selections this year. It is a core part of the list management strategy but seemingly very poorly understood.
Can’t find a link to share but Ch 7 reported Clark is reconsidering potential trade request in light of Scarlett’s departure.
I must say if Scarlett actually said he’d refuse to play Clark in ‘his’ backline I think that’s extremely poor and the antithesis of how talented young players should be developed.
In theory, no. But he’s going to want more certainty than that.Signing rhys doesnt stop ladhams being no1.
Bit of work but you could do a median versus finishing position variance which would factor out your clubs success and leave you with your traded to position.That measure wouldn’t tell you much as if you continually finish high in the ladder, as we do, your median pick will be further down the order.
It’s nothing new further than what has been speculated I don’t think:Can’t find a link to share but Ch 7 reported Clark is reconsidering potential trade request in light of Scarlett’s departure.
I must say if Scarlett actually said he’d refuse to play Clark in ‘his’ backline I think that’s extremely poor and the antithesis of how talented young players should be developed.
Losing Clark not great but that would be falling on your feetIf Clark goes, which sounds more likely than not, best case scenario would be Clark & 34 for 25 (via Carlton for Cerra) & 27. Values Clark around end of first round, which is what Geelong have apparently requested, and Freo don’t have to use or split a first rounder. Look at then trading 30 & 32 for Bulldogs 17. Gets us into the first round and gives the dogs points. Hit the draft with 17, 25 & 27