Review Good/Bad vs Sydney

[bonehilda]

I can’t ******* believe the one time we’re actually clutch at the death this happens

 

[BACCS]

Can we replay the game as compensation?

 

[Crow_68]

Poor goal umpire saw the padding move, and assumed it was the ball not the player's hand. Tough decision for him.

It’s pure arrogance from an individual who should never umpire again.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Do we get the moral victory?

The afl can’t overturn the result when there’s 40 seconds left, instead I say the afl should give us Sydney’s first pick as compensation

 

[Redleg Crow]

Poor goal umpire saw the padding move, and assumed it was the ball not the player's hand. Tough decision for him.

Not tough at all. A very easy decision to review.

 

[Carmo]

Nicks:

"For whatever reason we weren't at our best in the first half"

Finger on the pulse

Umm, I'll go with, because it was greasy.
If he hasn't picked that pattern yet, its a bit worrying.

 

[Burtonsgottago]

Go

Re: the Keays' "point", I didn't see any replays that showed the ball touching/hitting the post (it was nowhere near the padding). Anybody who was there, can you say definitively it was a goal, please?
Not that it'll change anything.
The GU called "point" straight away.
If it had been reviewed it was most likely the GU's call would not have been overturned.

There was an accumulation of scheissen-hausen Crows' mistakes and inability to execute before then which should have made the Keays kick irrelevant anyway.
Let's face it, our Crows were not good enough, today, and in several other games.

Funny, if the goal umpire does his job and calls that a goal then Sydney would not have been good enough today

 

[Redleg Crow]

Should be being celebrated as one of our best ever come from behind wins. * this amateur competition

 

[BACCS]

It’s just so ******* obvious from every angle/vision from journos on Twitter atm that it’s a clear goal, zero doubt it would have been overturned.

 

[Moonwatcher]

Needed Peter Vardy

Peter Vardy

Age

48

Ht

181cm

Wt

83kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

11.0

3star

K

7.6

3star

HB

3.4

3star

M

3.1

3star

T

1.4

3star

G

1.5

5star

No current season stats available

D

10.4

3star

K

7.6

3star

HB

2.8

3star

M

2.2

3star

T

1.2

3star

G

0.6

3star

in those conditions.

 

[Moonwatcher]

Was ARC available?

 

[BACCS]

AO was genuinely pumping after we all thought that was a goal, haven’t seen scenes like that since Dawson’s goal

 

[BunjiMC]

It's been fun these last 28 years with an AFC membership. But it has to come to an end. Can't give these campaigners one more cent.

 

[FR0GGY]

Now 0-4 from scoring under 80pts at AO 9-0 when we score over it.

 

[BACCS]

That was the same goal umpire as the infamous Jenkins goal 5 years ago in the Showdown

 

[Disco Fox]

Umm, I'll go with, because it was greasy.
If he hasn't picked that pattern yet, its a bit worrying.

The old chestnut - did they instruct EVERY player to wear longer stops - no choice.

 

[VKCrow]

I’m done with this comp.

 

[TRP1996]

Now 0-4 from scoring under 80pts at AO 9-0 when we score over it.

Would’ve won with 78 points, though.

 

[Redleg Crow]

Was ARC available?

No - ARC is only done for goals not “points”. The umpire has to ask for a review of a point

 

[Moonwatcher]

That was the same goal umpire as the infamous Jenkins goal 5 years ago in the Showdown

Wasn't going to let us get away with it twice.

 

[PeterSalt]

No Nicks, YOU lost it on Thursday night - AGAIN

When the heat was on the first half .. I saw our special Rory on the screen twice

 

[beartoo]

Re: the Keays' "point", I didn't see any replays that showed the ball touching/hitting the post (it was nowhere near the padding). Anybody who was there, can you say definitively it was a goal, please?
Not that it'll change anything.
The GU called "point" straight away.
If it had been reviewed it was most likely the GU's call would not have been overturned.

There was an accumulation of scheissen-hausen Crows' mistakes and inability to execute before then which should have made the Keays kick irrelevant anyway.
Let's face it, our Crows were not good enough, today, and in several other games.

Yeah, we didn't didn't deserve to win, except that we were all over them for fitness for the last quarter and a half. I was there. It was a goal and we should have played finals this year. GWS may also miss because of this decision. Goal umpire and review umpire should be sacked at a minimum.

On SM-A115F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[CrowBloke]

I think this footage shows it all.
Angle 1 shows a gap between ball and post. Doubt on Angle 1 was whether it hit padding.
Angle 2 shows that the ball cleared the post so it can't have hit the padding.

I would have expected the goal would have been overturned.

Yeah, I can see all that, fair call,
BUT
it wasn't reviewed so we'll never know if Jon Ralph/you or I was right.

Records will show forever a 1-point loss and Crows' season over.

P.S. I dunno about "bravest Goal Umpire". Looked a goal to me, on TV.

 

[Smoooothy]

Was ARC available?

Yep

 

[MsTopG]

I still can't believe we were robbed of one of the best comebacks this year. Dumbfounded.