Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Roylion was quoting from a website called dark emu exposed, which makes the same argument, word for word almost that Roylion did. I dunno if it's his website or not.
That bit Roylion referred to is flawed, and based on that alone I'm not gonna bother with it.
I haven't even read Pascoes book so I'm not wasting my time on flawed critiques of it.
My point is (and always has been) is that no historical work (including Pascoe's) can be left uncritically examined. Claiming that Pascoe offers the unvarnished truth and that his work is 'game-changing' is overwought. There are legitimate criticisms of the way Pascoe uses / edits his sources to mount his argument.
How do you know it's flawed?
You haven't read Pascoe's book (I have), nor the criticisms of it, yet you still offer comment on it?
Bolt hasn't and does.You haven't read Pascoe's book (I have), nor the criticisms of it, yet you still offer comment on it?
Move Australia Day to 26th September
I just want to reiterate that I haven't said anything about the book itself.Bolt hasn't and does.
Bolt hasn't and does.
I don't pay much attention to what Bolt says on a range of issues.
That poster iirc was the one that got worked up into a lather in the Bolt is a troll thread when I mention that the triggered far left are the bloke's lifeblood.It's the alt left generic response when they run out of programmed opinions. These folks are of the belief that the mere mention of that single four letter word has the power to automatically invalidate any discussion that intellectually encroaches upon their "feelings".
They pay more attention to Bolt than the "conservatives".
I haven't made any comment on his book. Just what is typed here. I have read more criticisms of his book than the book because they are in the public discussion at the moment.
Didn't that fella you cited, RG, claim the species of yam the mob in wa were cultivating was introduced to them by survivors from the Batavia, along with cultivation techniques cited by Pascoe?
How is that possible when the species they cultivate is a local species, Dioscorea Hastifolia, cultivated from south of Perth all the way to where that mob live?
Aren't the cultivation techniques similar long that entire Coastline? To me that sounds at odds with his claims of Dutch influence
No one is saying Pascoe is offering the unvarnished truth. They are saying its a game changer in that it challenges the current consensus about how indigenous Australians lived and what level of sophistication and complexity their societies had and provides evidence that does actually challenge those previous consensus views.
However as a general principle .... Yeah. Don't accept anything uncritically, including historical accounts of things.
I see the NRL boys aren't going to sing the national anthem at the all-stars game.
So, do we now need a bran nue song to go with a bran nue dae?
Agree 100%It's all down to the bicentenary, coming on the heels of the US one commemorating their independence from the UK. And the ending of the cultural cringe to a degree after we won a few Olympic gold medals, the Americas cup, some Hollywood thing and art^.
It was a half arsed attempt to install some genuine national pride. Unfortunately the half arsed nature of it has caused some real problems.
^Thanks Ken Done.
Thank you for showing an example of how Pascoe may have over-egged his point from time to time. You have rightly shown how we need to be circumspect always, though I don't think it's a clincher. And as I said, I'm not aware of a howl of protest from professional historians. (Do point me to this howl if it's passed me by.)
The book has been out since 2014, so it’s not as if they haven’t had plenty of time to shoot his claims down in flames (and I do recall one journalist - was it Rick Morton? - recently spent several days checking Pascoe's sources in the various national and state archives, and pronounced them 100% solid.)
Anyone who doesn't think we need a new anthem doesnt truly love the country that thing is an abomination.I see the NRL boys aren't going to sing the national anthem at the all-stars game.
So, do we now need a bran nue song to go with a bran nue dae?
Anyone who doesn't think we need a new anthem doesnt truly love the country that thing is an abomination.
It's a joke, why are you so annoyed by it?Lol yeah round them up I guess
What a stupid thing to say , like a song and you don’t truly love the country
There’s some moronic sh*t on the internet but you probably win today
Shattered arent you.Lol yeah round them up I guess
What a stupid thing to say , like a song and you don’t truly love the country
There’s some moronic sh*t on the internet but you probably win today
Thanks I’ll check it out.Just as an an addendum to this earlier discussion, two academics Peter Sutton, one of Australia’s leading anthropologists and archaeologist Keryn Walshe have written Farmers or Hunter-Gatherers? The Dark Emu Debate which is to be released next week by Melbourne University Press. This new work heavily criticises and rebuts Pascoe's 'Dark Emu'.
The Age has a couple of articles on the new book if you're interested.
Debunking Dark Emu (Good Weekend The Age) Saturday 12/6/2021
Anthropologist and archaeologist say Dark Emu was littered with weak evidence and unsourced claims Saturday 12/6/2021
Thanks I’ll check it out.