I've often wondered the same.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
![]()
"Come at me haters"

I don't hate them. But I think there is this bit of an opinion that if you're going to do something that makes yourself stand out on the field like fluoro boots then you probably want to back it up with your on field performance.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If you Google image search , "tattooed vajayjay" , the first pic looks just like the above Bruce Doull pic![]()
So everyone should shave their entire head as it would increase heat loss.I do know, through athletics coaching, that beards do actually cause the body to heat up and limit the cooling effect of perspiration on that skin area - it is only minor but is scientific fact. There is a reason elite olympic runners don't have beards, it does limit performance very slightly.
For all the non-believers that think this facial hair fashion statement has no bearing on performance consider the reverse - the most body heat is lost through the exposed head and neck in cold conditions - the reverse in overheating situations also applies - you want maximum skin exposure (without direct sun as that just heats up anyway though reduced with suitable sunblocks but also limit to an extent perspiration from those areas) to perspire from and have the wind effect against the perspiration to cool the body - facial hair limits the wind effect from running of properly cooling through the evaporation effect of perspiration on the skin.
Footy players with beards, if they are honest and some have, would admit that they heat up more in their necks during games with a beard.
The big question is in the psyche - if a player is consciously willing to forego a small amount of performance due to their "fashion statement" what else subconsciously are they also not contributing 100% to apply themselves to get the best out of themselves?
You're dead right, and I have probably been guilty of doing what you describe, mainly with beards and tattoos. I've never had a problem with coloured boots. I blame the commentators who fuel the discussion. But seriously it shouldn't matter one iota, unless you're from Melbourne FC.Hear it all the time.
(insert player name here) would wanna be playing elite footy if he wants to sport (insert hair, beard, boots) like that.
Last year one of the commentators called Chris Newman out for wearing blue boots and said they're too flashy for a defender to wear.
Also commentators going on about beards and certain hairstyles distracting players from working hard etc.
I don't see how any of these things make a difference to one's playing ability, it's just personal choice. Maybe it's the media and spectators concentrating too much on the player's appearance rather than their performances.

Because its a team sport. The best team is not filled with people that want to make an individual out of themselves.
Pride in belonging in a team environment leads to a desire to belong not individualise.
Loyalty to your mates, the contest, the game and "what the team is about" would mean that you would be more interested in moving together than doing something that does not improve the entire group but only draws attention to yourself and not what the group is trying achieve. It is an action that suggests the individual is motivated more by self interest than by what is at stake. If you follow team directions, you will tell a story far greater than what your individual act achieves.
Wayne Bennett is a well respected NRL coach. He is more a coach of young boys to become good men and has always had a tactics-focused assistant coach to run plays. In answering a question of whether Willie Mason would ever regrow his famous afro again, he comments that Bennett would send him away from training immediately because it reflected a standard that was expected and not even being able to cut his hair within the normalised range of hair cuts sets a standard that you are willing to forgoe fashion for expectation.
Individual hair, shoes and beards are not the issue per say but what they say. Malceski and Shaw grew their beards together and was a sign of solidarity between the two team mates. Same action, different meaning but positive for the team. Kyle Reimers' bright shoes says hey look at me!
Because its a team sport. The best team is not filled with people that want to make an individual out of themselves.
But black boots are the staple. They look so much better and they send off a better signal. The lamest thing is when some prick rocks up to ammos colt's training in a pair of orange boots... who do you think you are?
Footy is a team game, the issue with boots is it just screams 'individuality' - there more interested in standing out and getting noticed then playing good team football.
As for the beards, for me it is an issue of professionalism. The turn of the 21st Century saw AFL become a fully fledged professional sport. Football players are now more scrutinised than ever and are constantly in the media, often outside of a football capacity. Such dress would not be tolerated in the work office, it's just not professional - notice how none of the captains or elite players have a beard, very amatuer.