Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
You wouldn't want to go with more than 5 pick anyway. Chances are we pick up 4 kids in the ND and leave one for the PSD unless there is a slider ala Knights or Johncock.macca23 said:Good to see. Both lads made pretty good progress this year, and like Stiffy, I hope they really make the grade at AFL level.
That leaves us with the 5 picks in the national draft.
16,17,32,48 and 64.
Just as an aside, that's 12 changes to our list in the last 15 months since Craig has been at the helm.
Just about spot on IMO.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Stiffy_18 said:You wouldn't want to go with more than 5 pick anyway. Chances are we pick up 4 kids in the ND and leave one for the PSD unless there is a slider ala Knights or Johncock.
Craigy has turned over a fair bit of the list in his time here and has done it at the right sort of rate.
In the order yo mentioned here. I do suspect that Griffin is more likely to get a go as a KPP than a ruckman at AFL level. He is VERY VERY mobile for his size and can take a reasonable mark. He is an interesting sort of player IMHO.McLeod23 said:Congratulations to the boys, but I thought the logical decision would have been to promote Hinge, and leave Griffen rookie listed.
Meaning we could draft another kid, and Griffen could still be promoted during the season if need be, in place of Hudson.
It leaves our rookie spaces empty though, so there's not too much of a difference.
For those who have seen SANFL this year - where do Maric, Meesen and Griffen stand in terms of 'next in line' for an AFL spot?
Its not allowed in a sense you are proposing.johnnypanther said:just a hypothetical for somebody to answer:
Would the rules have allowed us to:
- eg upgrade Hinge to the main list and keep Griffin on the rookie list thus giving us 6 available selections going into the national draft
- then at the national draft we decided to only use 5 out of the 6 picks thus leaving us with a vacancy on the main list
- at that stage (after the national draft but before the rookie draft) since we didnt use our 6th pick can we then upgrade (eg Griffin) from the rookie to the main list?
If the above scenario is allowed by the rules, then i would suggest that we should have followed that because it gives us the opportunity to pick up a 6th player (at the national or psd) if the unlikely scenario unfolded that somebody we really wanted was still available
Stiffy_18 said:Its not allowed in a sense you are proposing.
- we could have upgraded Hinge and kept Griffin on the rookie list
- This way we would have had 6 picks in the draft
- We could run with 39 on the list rather than 40
- We could only promote Griffin before the start of 2006 season and no at the time you are suggesting
- You can only promote rookies to cover for long term injuries. You can't promote them to fill up a free spot on the list if there are no long term injuries.
McLeod23 said:Meaning we could draft another kid, and Griffen could still be promoted during the season if need be, in place of Hudson.
macca23 said:Just as an aside, that's 12 changes to our list in the last 15 months since Craig has been at the helm.