Autopsy How many games will the umpires gift to Hawthorn this year?

[STP18]

This isn't the first time we've been reamed by Nicholls.

I'm not into conspiracy theories but I don't blame Crows supporters for thinking he's a s**t-stain on the AFL landscape.

Don't take it personally, Nicholls doesn't hate the Crows, he just hates whoever happens to be playing against his beloved Hawfs.

 

[Mego Red]

How much salt will the OP cry?

Correct decision gonna be correct.

CLutch goal by Poppy. THat's a proper gun small forward performance.

Six goals to one from frees.

Five frees to nil in the last four minutes.

At least a dozen balls-out terrible decisions that favored the Hawks.

Undeserved, and getting an armchair ride.

 

[JD Tomahawk]

I'd like to see if there is atleast 1 hawk supporter who has the balls to knowledge the umpires are out of control in their favour, just 1.

 

[Sixpence]

Six goals to one from frees.

Five frees to nil in the last four minutes.

At least a dozen balls-out terrible decisions that favored the Hawks.

Undeserved, and getting an armchair ride.

Maybe your defenders should try being a little more disciplined then.

 

[rdhopkins2]

I could complain about the free kicks missed for Hawthorn and the soft ones for the Crows but I won't.

 

[Cardio Carl]

Last week 2 incorrect decisions regarding 10mtr kicks which were deemed wrong costing St Kilda a win in the last minutes.

Then post game the offending umpire put on Facebook how he likes Hawthorn.

Tonight, a soft touch to the tummy from a crow on the ground resulted in a goal plus 3-5 other poor decisions.

However biggest was Isaac Smith grabbing the ball standing up and without any players around him started banging it into his chest and when grab the umpire said no prior opportunity. You are kidding. If that umpire is not sanctioned and stood down next week then it makes a clear statement that the umpires are protecting Hawthorn
Two weeks nowHawks have won on incorrect umpire calls.

The football public are not stupid and the umpiring department need to stand up and rectify.

 

[MaddAdam]

And the blatant holding the ball non-call at the siren? Another "correct" decision?

Worse than the Cunnington non holding the ball that cost Richmond a flag last year.

 

[Unique Name]

Yes.

 

[BallaratBulldog]

Let's make another thread, still alot of open spots on page one.

 

[LegendreturnsMJ]

The brown paper bags are full

 

[NTRabbit]

I could complain about the free kicks missed for Hawthorn and the soft ones for the Crows but I won't.

Yes, for you to complain about them they'd have to have happened first

 

[Unique Name]

How was it not holding the ball or incorrect disposal at the end then?

 

[SilentHunter_]

I could complain about the free kicks missed for Hawthorn and the soft ones for the Crows but I won't.

I am sure you'd be the first one to complain if your team was on the other side.

 

[shurg123]

25 games OP. Would you like some chips with that salt?

 

[velcrow]

I could complain about the free kicks missed for Hawthorn and the soft ones for the Crows but I won't.

Was there any?

 

[RobbieGray17]

For heck sake, how many threads do you crow w***ers want to start. Delete sooky thread

 

[rdhopkins2]

Surely you guys jest. We did not get an armchair ride all game.

 

[adammania9]

Short answer: No
Long answer: Nah

 

[Lithium]

If they were 10m kicks wouldn't that mean they were the right decision?

 

[King Cold]

However biggest was Zac Smith grabbing the ball standing up and without any players around him started banging it into his chest and when grab the umpire said no prior opportunity. You are kidding. If that umpire is not sanctioned and stood down next week then it makes a clear statement that the umpires are protecting Hawthorn
Two weeks nowHawks have won on incorrect umpire calls.

I didn't know that Zac Smith played for Hawthorn

 

[Messenger]

Tears, tears everywhere.

 

[Long Live HFC]

can't decide whether winning or tears taste better

 

[Sixpence]

Last week 2 incorrect decisions regarding 10mtr kicks which were deemed wrong costing St Kilda a win in the last minutes.

Then post game the offending umpire put on Facebook how he likes Hawthorn.

No, he didn't. He made is background on his twitter page a landscape photo of the G which had the Hawthorn banner in a small part of it. Idiots then took take as he was supporting Hawks. It's since been debunked and that he doesn't follow the Hawks.

However biggest was Zac Smith grabbing the ball standing up and without any players around him started banging it into his chest and when grab the umpire said no prior opportunity. You are kidding. If that umpire is not sanctioned and stood down next week then it makes a clear statement that the umpires are protecting Hawthorn
Two weeks nowHawks have won on incorrect umpire calls.

What the heck are you talking about? Zac Smith plays for Geelong. Geelong beat us.

 

[FISTO]

I could complain about the free kicks missed for Hawthorn and the soft ones for the Crows but I won't.

can't, not won't.

 

[Chuckie357]

Last week 2 incorrect decisions regarding 10mtr kicks which were deemed wrong costing St Kilda a win in the last minutes.

Then post game the offending umpire put on Facebook how he likes Hawthorn.

Tonight, a soft touch to the tummy from a crow on the ground resulted in a goal plus 3-5 other poor decisions.

However biggest was Zac Smith grabbing the ball standing up and without any players around him started banging it into his chest and when grab the umpire said no prior opportunity. You are kidding. If that umpire is not sanctioned and stood down next week then it makes a clear statement that the umpires are protecting Hawthorn
Two weeks nowHawks have won on incorrect umpire calls.

The football public are not stupid and the umpiring department need to stand up and rectify.

For starters, the ball has to travel 15m to be paid a mark not 10 and secondly the blokes name is Issac smith not Zac.