- May 17, 2015
- 4,951
- 5,405
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Falsifying evidence and misconduct within the religion of science is well known,there are numerous papers on the topic.Science and scientists continually offer caveats against their work,their work is offered up publically,so that their methods and theories can be falsified by themselves firstly and others in the field that they work in.
This is not arrogance,this forms a major part in their chosen field of endeavour.
Religion and faith offers no caveats or falsifiability in their beliefs,otherwise their entire system falls apart at the very seams.
I stand by by my original quote and I don't think you've been able to falsify it.
My "big bangin conspiracy"post was a direct slur at your former posts regarding government funding rhetoric,directing certain scientific research to denude it from fact,in order to keep that funding available.
If the math or theorem don't add up,you will be publicly embarrassed trying to push an agenda that will be easily falsified.
This is something any scientist worth their salt will do their utmost to avoid.
I'm not saying it doesn't or hasn't happened,ie climate change etc,but political forces and other more cynical forces are always at work to undermine specific policy making by one side or the other and this is not great science and will be found out eventually.
Again,I stand by my post and don't think you've attacked my position with any validity or quantifiable stance.
I said I wouldn't engage in this nonsense,but felt I needed to,in order to make my position clear to the rest of my comrades on either side of the argument on this forum.
With such a heavy reliance on funding it is certainly plausible to suggest some of this misconduct is overlooked within the religion of sciences community,it would be pure arrogance to dismiss this as not possible.