Ned_Flanders
Make me an Admin!
- Aug 22, 2009
- 77,158
- 142,364
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- 76'ers
- Thread starter
- #526
Not a chance. Whch is why the hardwick comparison is nonsense.
They are paid what they are worth.
I would pay them more on the proviso they went full-time and it was made more attractive.
As for my earlier point, it stands. People calling for more transparency, or for decisions to be analysed and scrutinised, are living in dreamworld. There wouldn't be a single poster posting on this thread who would accept an umpire was right if the decision was analaysed and proven to be correct. So what would education achieve?
You keep changing your view on this
One minute you say "no right to question", then you say " transparency is.fine", now you say "you cant be trusted to be fair when handling that transparency"
Which is it? Is it wrong to question or are we too dumb to be allowed to question?
Cover ups encourage conspiracy bullshit. All your policy of.silence does is foster that and make it worse.
Also if umps are getting face time.on tv and social media (via the afl/umps assoc), do you think they have given up the right to protection behind a wall of silence?