Apex36
Hall of Famer
- Mar 26, 2014
- 39,062
- 81,568
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Allegedly. There's no solid evidence of that as yet and there's no indication that he's actually a part of our academy.He identifies as aboriginal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Allegedly. There's no solid evidence of that as yet and there's no indication that he's actually a part of our academy.He identifies as aboriginal
He identifies as aboriginal
What does that even mean? It's all well and good to identify as Indigenous but surely there would need to be some tangible link through his recent heritage (no longer than 4 generations) that would enable him to fall into this category?
What does that even mean?
The plot thickens at number 9 on that list!
Didn't they change the rules so that clubs' first round selections are not affected being in a point deficit? Or is that not what you mean?
No doubt the 2019 draft will be a "super dooper" draft so we'll be able trade our future picks back into 2018 picks.
The next year's draft is always a super draft...
ugh. Don't know how many times i have to shoot holes in this argument.
If I was to guess I'd say "Kaynor" myself.
I was only joking, but please... shoot some more!
I imagine they may pluck one or two out of the Mildura area here and there. I wonder how long it will take the AFL to change things up if one team's zone is more fruitful than everyone else's.
Allegedly. There's no solid evidence of that as yet and there's no indication that he's actually a part of our academy.
Took their time allowing the Dawks to become a powerhouse under zoning before they decided to axe that system.
You'd assume it's the same as McCarthy last year, who despite being the whitest person on the planet with red hair, found out a couple of years previously that he had some Aboriginal heritage, and thus qualified in the NGA zone for St Kilda, who could have taken him as a cat b rookie if he'd been overlooked in the rookie draft.What does that even mean? It's all well and good to identify as Indigenous but surely there would need to be some tangible link through his recent heritage (no longer than 4 generations) that would enable him to fall into this category?
Unfortunately anytime pies gain an advantage they knee jerk rule change the following year, take the interchange for example, also Jimmy Clement making Hird his bitch started the hands in the back rule change etc.
I'm skeptical that the AFL would accept that, particularly if it meant Collingwood being gifted a first round prospect.ONly needs to go to a tribal Elder and have him say he is, regardless of DNA and they can't fight it.
Unfortunately anytime pies gain an advantage they knee jerk rule change the following year, take the interchange for example, also Jimmy Clement making Hird his bitch started the hands in the back rule change etc.
I'm skeptical that the AFL would accept that, particularly if it meant Collingwood being gifted a first round prospect.
Not sure it would be that simple and I'm not sure of the exact wording of the rules surrounding the NGA's. For instance, if the rules state that a prospect must have demonstrable Indigenous or Multicultural heritage then it's pretty black and white. Green could say I identify as indigenous, and the AFL could simply say 'we respect your right to identify as Indigenous but these are the rules surrounding the academies etc. We are happy to include you in any indigenous camps, programs promotions in the AFL system should you be drafted though.'AFL can't beat the supreme court and massive bad press it would garner, they wouldn't even try denounce him due to it being a PR nightmare.
Not sure it would be that simple and I'm not sure of the exact wording of the rules surrounding the NGA's. For instance, if the rules state that a prospect must have demonstrable Indigenous or Multicultural heritage then it's pretty black and white. Green could say I identify as indigenous, and the AFL could simply say 'we respect your right to identify as Indigenous but these are the rules surrounding the academies etc. We are happy to include you in any indigenous camps, programs promotions in the AFL system should you be drafted though.'
Honestly, if it was that easy to get in to an NGA heaps of kids would be doing it.
But it only takes 1 very good draft crop to set a team up.
They would be accepting what he identifies as. If he has Indigenous heritage then there would be no problem. As it stands it doesn't look like he does, or is identifying as Indigenous and in the NGA, so this argument is likely moot. Honestly, the media would be all over it if we had a first round prospect coming through our NGA for 2018.Why do you assume its easy, do you think Elders of a tribe will just hand out acceptance like confetti to unknown kids?
He would have had to grow up within a tight nit community for starters and likely have relatives that are indigenous through some connection.
AFL could not preclude him from it (Academy) and on the other hand say but you can be a part of all the other indigenous programs. They'd have no leg to stand on if they did that as they are accepting his heritage but being prejudiced for that sole Academy selection criteria.
I'd argue 1 excellent draft crop year, followed by at least 2 "good" draft years, otherwise you become light on after your initial star players.
Are you Andrew Bolt?What does that even mean? It's all well and good to identify as Indigenous but surely there would need to be some tangible link through his recent heritage (no longer than 4 generations) that would enable him to fall into this category?