As several other posters have already stated, I had always believed that Trigg took the rap for the whole board and that was why he was not sacked. However, heard from a reliable source that it was definitely to do with his work and negotiations to do with Adelaide Oval. Another words it was too hard for some-one else to come on board with all the detail.








Whilst I will always support AFC, it does not mean I have to accept the boards decision & move on like they want me & others to... & forget about the whole saga. I believe it is important to voice my strong disapproval of their decision to hold no one properly accountable for the major stuff ups in decision making. They should always be reminded that when in high places, you should be accountable for your actions... yet this has clearly not occurred. What sort of governanance model is this?

