Scandal Joel Smith (Melbourne): Cocaine trafficking accusation

Remove this Banner Ad

Trafficking Accusation:


MFC and AFL Statements:

Melbourne Football Club Media Statement – Joel Smith


The Melbourne Football Club has been advised by the AFL that further Anti-Doping Rule Violations have been asserted against Joel Smith by Sport Integrity Australia.

The Melbourne Football Club is not authorised to make public comment while this is an ongoing matter that is being investigated by Sport Integrity Australia.

It should be noted since the article has been published on the Herald Sun website, Joel’s management has contacted the Club on his behalf to advise that the comments made by the source within the article are not reflective of Joel’s views and the source is not speaking on any authority from Joel.

Joel has made it very clear that he has no issues or concerns with anyone at the Melbourne Football Club.

As the Club has previously stated, we will wait for the investigation to be completed before we update our supporters further.

AFL STATEMENT – JOEL SMITH

The AFL confirms that further Anti-Doping Rule Violations (ADRVs) have been asserted against Joel Smith of the Melbourne Football Club under the Australian Football Anti-Doping Code.

Sport Integrity Australia (SIA) has notified Smith that three ADRVs for “Trafficking or Attempted Trafficking” of Cocaine to third parties are asserted against him.

Under the Code, Trafficking in an anti-doping context is relevantly defined to be “Selling, giving, transporting, sending, delivering or distributing a Prohibited Substance, by an Athlete … to any third party [but] shall not include actions involving Prohibited Substances which are not prohibited in Out-of-Competition Testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate such Prohibited Substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes or are intended to enhance sport performance” (Article 1 of the Code).

Further, SIA has notified Smith that an ADRV for Possession of a Prohibited Substance (Cocaine) on 9 September 2022 is asserted against him.

These ADRVs are in addition to that previously asserted against him (in connection with a sample provided by him after the match between Melbourne and Hawthorn on 20 August 2023 which tested positive to Cocaine and its metabolite, Benzoylecgonine).

Smith will continue to be provisionally suspended pending the finalisation of all of these matters, meaning he is not permitted to be part of Melbourne’s football program, including Melbourne’s pre-season training that is currently underway.

Under the Code, the new asserted ADRVs will be further investigated by SIA and these matters may ultimately be heard by an AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal in the coming months.

Due to the ongoing nature of the anti-doping process, the AFL and SIA are unable to make any further comment at this time.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Log in to remove this ad.

Ah of course the blokes who left
Grundy as well?
Harmes and Jorden (and Grundy, now that you mention it) both chose clubs with well publicised "issues" around illegal narcotics.
Now for the record, I'm not saying this is a coincidence.
 
View attachment 1909454

With a maximum jail time of 15 years for trafficable quantities, would obviously depend highly on the amount total between 3g and 250g. A huge difference there but pretty much any amount ends the possibility of an AFL return if there was one.
Makes that story about the bikie parked outside a player's house a bit more intriguing .. a player who was reportedly on leave.
 
Last edited:
I will say that sporting bodies having access to mobile phones of athletes seems a bit unnecessary.
No doubt many players would have an archive of nudes etc. sitting there, Mr. Peabody at SALADA doesn't need to see that stuff.

Mind you any drug trafficker that's not a complete moron would be using something like Wickr, surely.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Well texts confirming he was offering to sell coke to teammates... How many teammates did he offer it to? How many teammates have previously purchased from him?
Wouldn't be the first time, that would be done in person not over text. Drug culture all but confirmed.
 
But Gary Pert said it's the best culture he's ever been involved in. Imagine what Collingwood must have been up to a few years ago :cautiousv1:

/s

In some ways, times were simpler under Neeld.
 
Is it Gill’s, though? AFLPA lobbied hard for it if I remember correctly……
You might be right, but he as the (previous) AFL CEO he has ultimate control.

What I'm suggesting is that - while Cocaine is prevalent (and is) in Australian society amongst under 40's, the AFL took the stance that they'll look the other way, and accept it's use - even amongst the game's biggest names with 3 strikes.

What I'm suggesting is that a zero tolerance or at very best a 1 strike then you're out policy is the only sensible move. If you want to exceed that then go and get a job at bunnings. It's moronic policy at best. Complete incompetence really.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top