Judd vs Kerr vs Goodes vs West

[mathew ollaik]

Thoughts

 

[trueblue_91]

If there is any poll with Judd he will allways win

 

[Quinz]

Agreed, any poll that has Judd in it is already decided IMO.

Anyway, I would rate them Judd > Goodes > Kerr > West

I would say that Black > West as well.

 

[dales.girl38]

West is 31, I think...silly to put him in a poll with these 3.

 

[#1 Tigers Fan]

Agreed, any poll that has Judd in it is already decided IMO.

Anyway, I would rate them Judd > Goodes > Kerr > West

I would say that Black > West as well.

Agree but Black infront of West and that is the order of the best midfields going around. Although you could create arguments for so many others.

 

[JKCeagle]

Judd > Kerr > Goodes > West.

On 2007 form, Goodes has been a little quiet, West hasn't done anything wrong but nothing too spectacular either, but the Eagle boys have been white-hot. Could argue for Kerr > Judd right now, I think Judd is marginally more valuable to the team though.

 

[JKCeagle]

Agree but Black infront of West and that is the order of the best midfields going around. Although you could create arguments for so many others.

I don't really think so...there are alot of very good midfielders that don't belong in a discussion of the best with the likes of Goodes/Black/Kerr/Judd...for example Dal Santo, Hodge, Burgoyne...all excellent but nobody would think they are the best right now.

 

[Blacky]

Agreed, any poll that has Judd in it is already decided IMO.

Anyway, I would rate them Judd > Goodes > Kerr > West

I would say that Black > West as well.

Nail Head Hit

 

[SMFC]

Dual Brownlow medalist > Judd > Kerr > West.