- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Posts
- 5,507
- Reaction score
- 11,546
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool FC, AEK FC
eh?When did any of that happen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

eh?When did any of that happen?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
That wave of players coloured/influenced by old SANFL allegiances is pretty much in the rear view mirror thank god, I feel like guys like Francou, R. James & Cornes' etc. had to run their own narrative to make it acceptable to play for the 'devil'.it's absolutely baffling that you could play 300 games for a club but still not show any respect for it.
I understand what Kane's paid to do, and he does pretty good job at it but their does seem to be a gloves off approach to Port now and he is going out of his way to nitpick the club. Taking issue with how we take pride in our history is probably his worst ever take, and disrespectful in my opinion. Probably the most annoying thing he has ever said, i hate that he has finally said something that's triggered me.That wave of players coloured/influenced by old SANFL allegiances is pretty much in the rear view mirror thank god, I feel like guys like Francou, R. James & Cornes' etc. had to run their own narrative to make it acceptable to play for the 'devil'.
Loved that part. Wish people had called it out while Ken was hereCalled out what the entire Ken era was - avoiding accountability and expectation at all costs.
We all hope that Josh is the opposite of that approach and, from what we've seen so far, it appears so.
Seriously, I know it's rage clickbait, but he is turning into his old man. Of course he thinks he can speak for all young footballers as if they have no sense of history.
Of course their love for some old dude is a given.

Seriously, I know it's rage clickbait, but he is turning into his old man. Of course he thinks he can speak for all young footballers as if they have no sense of history.
Of course their love for some old dude is a given.
R. James
I'm probably stating the obvious but I think that the only way the Cornes clan were able to cope with Chad and Kane playing for Port was to disassociate our AFL team from our SANFL origins. Chad will turn on us next year when he joins SENIf you aren't embracing the history of a club you are recruited to (or brought along to by parents, siblings etc.), than why would you stay at any club, either as a player or a supporter? History is what makes clubs. Despite the AFL's best efforts, people don't rock up round 1, with no connection to what's happened previously and decide who to follow.
The smart clubs embrace their history, not as a millstone, as Kane thinks, but as a foundation, an example to build upon. An ethos to live and an example to try and emulate. From the time we've entered the AFL our strongest successes have come from embracing our history, our nadir's from running away from it (Southern Power, than Hinkleyfication). I'm hoping we'll now also get more past players back at the club, something that dropped off under Hinkley.
That Carr, Rutten and co. (minus an obviously bemused/confused Bicho) have again embraced what Port WAS, to try and turn it again into what Port IS, and getting articles like this against it, tells you everything about Kane. That he may have played for Port, even been an important part of a premiership for Port, but he never understood Port and never will.
Says more about us a little. How did we let this loser get to 300 games.. he was useless in the last 5 years +?it's absolutely baffling that you could play 300 games for a club but still not show any respect for it.
Well its been covered so many times before that I don't really want to go into it, but if Kane got the best out of himself, it was on the stat sheet only. and a winner on the field?
Hanrahan and fake positivity - more lets get ready to kick Carr.

