noosa hawk mad
Norm Smith Medallist
Skipper is unlucky IMO Hooper & Perterson both came with bad attiute problems so know surprises here big cull but was overdue IMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What evidence is there these guys are ready to make the step to senior players. They struggled to get senior games last year mainly due to the likes of Skipper, Peterson and Hooper being in the squad. Saying they will be pushing for senior or depth player status now that these players are not in their way is a bit optomistic . I hope we do alright in the draft.
Are you being serious? Why should he? He is his own person. He will contribute in his own way and will not be measure against any former Hawk player.Breust!!!!! Realisitcally as keen as he will be he is hardly going to fill in as a Hooper, Peterson, Moss, Stokes, Morton aor Brown.
Are you being serious? Why should he? He is his own person. He will contribute in his own way and will not be measure against any former Hawk player.
Surely he's ready to go in 2011. He played pre-season this year and looked alright. If anything this year, having Hooper restricted his opportunity to get a game. He had a great year at Box Hill, so I think we'll see a step up for Luke.The question submitted was who will play the role as the forward in the role Hooper Peterson, Brown etc... Suggesting Breust - somoenoe who hasn't played a senior game is the worry. He will be his own person no doubt but on what time frame. If he was good enough he would have played this year. We need a player to play that forward role game 1 2011.
McGlynn walked. Why is it so difficult for you to understand this?
To answer your question, yeah I rate Stephen Gilham. I rate all our players, because I trust the club to do something I can't, and that is have the intelligence to choose the best side they can. I respect Pelchen for what he does, because I know he's doing the best job he can do. I will not criticise someone when I have no idea how to do his job, just as I'd not like it to be done to me.
You are an absolute muppet mate, Hooper Peterson and brown are hardly superstars, your speaking as if mark lecras has to be the 1 taking their spot. Have you watched any VFL games this year? Because if you did you would realise that Breust, Lisle, Savage and Shiels all deserved to get games but didn't due to (imo) poor selection. All 4 are more than capable of playing games next year and ALL have talent, you just haven't seen it.The question submitted was who will play the role as the forward in the role Hooper Peterson, Brown etc... Suggesting Breust - somoenoe who hasn't played a senior game is the worry. He will be his own person no doubt but on what time frame. If he was good enough he would have played this year. We need a player to play that forward role game 1 2011.
McGlynn walked. Why is it so difficult for you to understand this?
To answer your question, yeah I rate Stephen Gilham. I rate all our players, because I trust the club to do something I can't, and that is have the intelligence to choose the best side they can. I respect Pelchen for what he does, because I know he's doing the best job he can do. I will not criticise someone when I have no idea how to do his job, just as I'd not like it to be done to me.
They wanted to leave. Simple as that.
K3 was probably fourth in line in terms of being another slow midfielder. Trade one of our Premiership mids for a KPD or speed and our list looks better. K3 was and is marginal with us so is not a great loss.
BMac was offered a 1 year contract. Why? We did not have a heap of mids coming through. He provided run in a sluggish side we should have worked harder to keep him. In terms of upcoming mids we have Shiels. That is it.
Is anyone really surprised by the delistings? We never had the depth and we should have protected our list.
Is anyone really surprised by the delistings? We never had the depth and we should have protected our list.
Its not really depth if its a) not afl quality or b) not ever going to get to afl standard.
Im very surprised morton and suckling appear to have got another year. I'm not sure what morton offers over muston - if you were keeping one I'd keep muston as has more upside. After 4 years on our list suckling has yet to play a game at afl standard. Both appear coaches favorites.
We could have easily delisted morton, suckling and ladson and it would have hardly affected our season next year.
Did i read right? Did Morton get a year contract and showed nothing yet Skipper gets delisted and showed everything???
Its not really depth if its a) not afl quality or b) not ever going to get to afl standard.
Im very surprised morton and suckling appear to have got another year. I'm not sure what morton offers over muston - if you were keeping one I'd keep muston as has more upside. After 4 years on our list suckling has yet to play a game at afl standard. Both appear coaches favorites.
We could have easily delisted morton, suckling and ladson and it would have hardly affected our season next year.