He’s a drunken lightweight flim-flam man appealing to the worst side of humanity.
One can only assume you are on absynthe.
Thats the only way that post can make any sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s a drunken lightweight flim-flam man appealing to the worst side of humanity.
Not sure ‘restrictive duties’ was mentioned much. The viciousness of the media was many times. And disappointment the ‘firm’ couldn’t or wouldn’t address it
Of course it will. It is really quite inconsequental stuff, despite the media hype and overblown analysis.
Not so sure that will be the public perception. Eugenics has a bit of a bad reputation...
1649-60 disproves thisa monarchy that hasnt lost a home game since 1066
1649-60 disproves this
This. She is barely a footnote in history. Just a ten second pimple on the backside a monarchy that hasnt lost a home game since 1066.
Serious? Hardly Mary queen of Scots.
Drivel. The media fawned over here and even gushed over the utterly absurd wedding. She was treated far better than Camilla and Fergie.
Andrew's wife got a hard time as well.
Goes both ways. Is it that hard to believe that a narcissistic vacuous failed Hollywood A lister would not have the propensity to exaggerate, and in some cases totally make up, events in order to portray herself as the victim and therefore win the sympathy of the public over the monarchy; an institution that has a set of protocols that have been established over centuries and that Markle wanted special treatment from in the way of exemptions from those restrictions?
Something that no other royal has had the privilege of being granted? Thinks very highly of herself this Markle does, no excuse she didn't know anything about it, as she claims.
The least she could have done before joining the British monarchy was to do a bit of homework to understand what she was getting herself into. The ranga's past girlfriends broke up with him exactly for those reasons, they couldn't handle the overwhelming attention and the restrictive duties they were expected to perform.
So? Who isn't? I've come across a number of African Americans who've expressed and/or displayed some obvious 'bigoted' behaviour but absolutely detest being called out on it because in their mind being a person of 'colour' means they're a minority and therefore they lack the power/agency/etc... that a person that belongs to a European majority population of a particular country can inflict on those of non-European backgrounds and that absolves them from 'racism' of dodgy remarks/behaviour in their twisted logic.
In fact Markle herself displays some cringeworthy behaviour, strongly alluding in comments that she wishes to be perceived as 'white' even though she has no problems playing up her African background when it is convenient to do so. It also wouldn't surprise me if she has had some slight cosmetic surgery to 'smooth' her African features and appear more European. In photos when she was in her teens it's pretty clear she has black ancestry with frizzy hair and other noticeable African facial characteristics that over time seemed to have been smoothed out somewhat.
You forgot tosh. Anyway this ‘monarchy’ won in 1066
The monarchy line has changed repeatedly but the institution has survived (almost) untouched.
NB Edwards wife was told to drop the private profit stuff.
The Normans didnt stuff about. Unlike the Brits in Australia they were hardly benevolent conquerors to the natives.
Harrying of the North - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Prince Charles wanted to issue point-by-point rebuttal after Harry and Meghan interview
The Prince of Wales is reportedly upset by Harry’s comments during the interview.pagesix.com
I don't see him taking over the Queen.Charles grounded. What’s the odds on him being passed over now? There’s plenty of precedent
When you get down to it, he’s hardly a physical figure. Elizabeth was young when she took over, we watched her grow old. She might outlive him anyway, he looks like he’s getting too much port and pheasant
Prince Charles wanted to issue point-by-point rebuttal after Harry and Meghan interview
The Prince of Wales is reportedly upset by Harry’s comments during the interview.pagesix.com
You don’t have long in-depth conversations with the toddler kicking and screaming throwin a tantrum in the corner. Just say a few words and walk away. Let them kick and scream in silence
Thought he looked pretty good the other day actually.Charles grounded. What’s the odds on him being passed over now? There’s plenty of precedent
When you get down to it, he’s hardly a physical figure. Elizabeth was young when she took over, we watched her grow old. She might outlive him anyway, he looks like he’s getting too much port and pheasant
Just single handedly released the UK from a cage of statist throttlerism which has saved thousands of lives
Well done. Im sure mods will delete such comments. yeah nah
Charles grounded. What’s the odds on him being passed over now?
There’s plenty of precedent
When you get down to it, he’s hardly a physical figure.
I don't see him taking over the Queen.
The Royals will eventually let Prince William to be the next King
Yep Farage was/is just another grifter that attracted all sort of dregs and dropouts to his side.Or lied to the public and unleashed chaos, then ran off when it got too tough.
He’s a drunken lightweight flim-flam man appealing to the worst side of humanity.