Multicultural Round - Why?

[Lance Uppercut]

I look forward to cousins being promoted as an idol of australia's drug culture

good one, good contribution

 

[DirtySanchezWCE]

Probably got ditched because it doesn't help promote the AFL image, who cares whether the fans loved it.[/quote]

shocker.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

And there lies the paradox. One one hand we're not supposed to remark on differences, on the other they're being celebrated. It's schizophrenic.

who says you're not supposed to "remark on differences"? That's a complete misunderstanding of it: the whole point is celebrating difference. Who says you aren't allowed to remark on differences?

 

[Ron The Bear]

who says you're not supposed to "remark on differences"? That's a complete misunderstanding of it: the whole point is celebrating difference. Who says you aren't allowed to remark on differences?

Did you read the post I quoted?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Did you read the post I quoted?

of course I did. Then I commented on your response to that post. That's how it works...

 

[Hollow Knight]

Yawn. Every day is White Men's Day. The only people who don't think so are white men.

Some of us are well aware.

(***LANGUAGE WARNING***)

 

[ChampRevesby]

Highlighting a divide by singling out a minority ethnic group is inherently racist and gives no credit to those that want to pull themselves out of such a label. Its like they are saying, we feel so sorry for you being a native, here have a round dedicated to the colour of your skin. Its BS.

 

[Call Me Cake]

This is why there will always be racism in this world.

It's because we continually identify people in different categories as opposed to being classed as "human beings". Yes, we have different racial groups - but that's purely biological. Why is it that we have to "praise" or pay "homage" to all different racial groups as if their achievements and contributions were as a result of their race or cultural group?

Pathetic arguments like the one earlier in the thread ("where is white man's round?" vs "every day is white man's round") aren't even recognizing the real problem.

We want to see everyone as equal, yet we continually base the achievements and identities of human beings on the biological appearances that are different. It's pathetic and so hypocritical. Either look at everyone and their achievements/contributions to this game or this country or the world as a collective group known as the human being - or be racist. You can't have it one way or the other, because it doesn't work that way. Yes, we look different, but that's where the buck stops.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Highlighting a divide by singling out a minority ethnic group is inherently racist and gives no credit to those that want to pull themselves out of such a label.

As long as they behave themselves like white men off the field, eh?

 

[Lance Uppercut]

This is why there will always be racism in this world.

It's because we continually identify people in different categories as opposed to being classed as "human beings". Yes, we have different racial groups - but that's purely biological. Why is it that we have to "praise" or pay "homage" to all different racial groups as if their achievements and contributions were as a result of their race or cultural group?

Pathetic arguments like the one earlier in the thread ("where is white man's round?" vs "every day is white man's round") aren't even recognizing the real problem.

We want to see everyone as equal, yet we continually base human beings achievements and identities on the biological appearances that are different. It's pathetic and so hypocritical. Either look at everyone and their achievements/contributions to this game or this country or the world as a collective group known as the human being - or be racist. You can't have it one way or the other, because it doesn't work that way.

vive le difference

 

[ChampRevesby]

This is why there will always be racism in this world.

It's because we continually identify people in different categories as opposed to being classed as "human beings". Yes, we have different racial groups - but that's purely biological. Why is it that we have to "praise" or pay "homage" to all different racial groups as if their achievements and contributions were as a result of their race or cultural group?

Pathetic arguments like the one earlier in the thread ("where is white man's round?" vs "every day is white man's round") aren't even recognizing the real problem.

We want to see everyone as equal, yet we continually base the achievements and identities of human beings on the biological appearances that are different. It's pathetic and so hypocritical. Either look at everyone and their achievements/contributions to this game or this country or the world as a collective group known as the human being - or be racist. You can't have it one way or the other, because it doesn't work that way. Yes, we look different, but that's where the buck stops.

Could not have said it better myself.
Kudos Cake!

 

[The_Koach]

I would have thought that multicultural round is one that it is used to highlight the fact the Australian Rules Football, as a sport show's no boundaries, regardless of someones race, religion, sexuality etc.

I don't see why so many people have an issue with such rounds? In the end, the priority of these rounds is to generate interest and increased participation numbers. How is this a bad thing?

There are plenty of families who are new to Australia, and the number is increasing all the time. For a young boy or girls who is new to the country, catching a glimpse of some of the promotion might be all it takes for them to have a go at participating.

Just as a side note, it is expected that by 2025 overseas born families will outnumber locally born families, so you can see why they are working hard to engage this group

 

[ausbacker]

The perception is that everything the AFL does revolves around maximising profit. The draw, broadcast rights, starting times, ball logos...it's a long list. Aggravating this, there is a lot of inconsistency. Many people take a cynical, or at least wary, view of the AFL's motives for every initiative. "Business before football", could be their motto.

That perception is well founded, but, I'm a realist and recognise that competitions and entities cannot survive on good will alone. It's often forgotten that business drives football and football drives business. The relationship isn't mutually exclusive.

There's a designated need for the AFL to demonstrate initiatives publicly. If they're not proactive, someone else will be and those in governance will be left sitting on their hands asking the question "why didn't we do that?"

 

[Lance Uppercut]

I would have thought that multicultural round is one that it is used to highlight the fact the Australian Rules Football, as a sport show's no boundaries, regardless of someones race, religion, sexuality etc.

I don't see why so many people have an issue with such rounds? In the end, the priority of these rounds is to generate interest and increased participation numbers. How is this a bad thing?

There are plenty of families who are new to Australia, and the number is increasing all the time. For a young boy or girls who is new to the country, catching a glimpse of some of the promotion might be all it takes for them to have a go at participating.

Just as a side note, it is expected that by 2025 overseas born families will outnumber locally born families, so you can see why they are working hard to engage this group

but you don't understand. It offends some people's sensitivities. That's way more important.

 

[Ron The Bear]

but you don't understand. It offends some people's sensitivities. That's way more important.

Do you find "blackface" skits discriminatory? Mahatma Cote? How about the GWS fans dressed as Hare Krishnas? Who draws the line? It seems to be those most offended.

Things like multicultural round, which are intended to be positive, also highlight the fractures in Australian society.

 

[Byron2008]

but you don't understand. It offends some people's sensitivities. That's way more important.

haha trying to step away eh now buddy?.. The simple fact that highlighting (even celebrating) ones ethnic background is racist has you stumped. Just keep ur moronic opinions to urself, u peanut.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

Do you find "blackface" skits discriminatory? Mahatma Cote? How about the GWS fans dressed as Hare Krishnas? Who draws the line? It seems to be those most offended.

Things like multicultural round, which are intended to be positive, also highlight the fractures in Australian society.

you're equating any of that with being offended by moves to lessen racism?

You need to examine your logic.

 

[Lance Uppercut]

haha trying to step away eh now buddy?.. The simple fact that highlighting (even celebrating) ones ethnic background is racist has you stumped. Just keep ur moronic opinions to urself, u peanut.

why am I not suprised you are incapable of understanding my response earlier. After all, it was in a funny language.

Celebrating difference is entirely different from discriminating because of it. Only, dare I say it, a peanut wouldn't get that

 

[Byron2008]

why am I not suprised you are incapable of understanding my response earlier. After all, it was in a funny language.

Celebrating difference is entirely different from discriminating because of it. Only, dare I say it, a peanut wouldn't get that

LOL you are a crack up.. Celebrating difference is very nearly the definition of racism..

 

[Lance Uppercut]

LOL you are a crack up.. Celebrating difference is very nearly the definition of racism..

no. It's not.

rac·ism

   [rey-siz-uhm]
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

It's pretty much completely the opposite. It's understanding the reality that there are differences, and finding celebration in that fact; rather than using it as a wedge or a tool of separation or oppression. Utterly distinct concepts in fact.

 

[Byron2008]

no. It's not.


It's pretty much completely the opposite. It's understanding the reality that there are differences, and finding celebration in that fact; rather than using it as a wedge or a tool of separation or oppression. Utterly distinct concepts in fact.

That in its purest form is a form of racism.. The very fact you bring up Race as an issue, is racist. . Martin Luther King - "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character"

 

[Lance Uppercut]

That in its purest form is a form of racism.. The very fact you bring up Race as an issue, is racist.

Here's another one to google: reductio ad absurdum.

Racism is described in the definition above. Humanity is made up of different parts. Fact.

 

[SydCrow]

Memo
From: AFL House
To: All stakeholders

Greetings all lovers of the oval shaped ball. As we celebrate Multicultural Round, we encourage you all to engage with us. Fans that means you!!
أفل شيء عظيم!
AFL ir lieliski!
AFL ইজ গ্রেট!

ps please forward any proposed banners to Ali Fahour for vetting

 

[Byron2008]

Racism is described in the definition above. Humanity is made up of different parts. Fact.

I detect a common theme here, you continually trying to bring up differences and isolating different races/religions... hmmmmmmmm

"in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character"..... think about it

 

[The 747]

For
For what?

Marketing for what? To raise awareness, get publicity, get more viewers, get more attendees through the gate. Why else?

You need to have something to promote, hence the AFL manufactured indigenous, womens, multicultural, rivalry rounds etc.