Mumford & Kennedy vs Jolly & Ball

[Powered Up]

All these players were Traded/Drafted in 09, which pair do you think has been better in this time.
Mumford & Kennedy vs Jolly & Ball?

 

[HyperAgressiveDonk]

Mumford is better than Jolly, whilst Kennedy is better than Ball.

 

[JonoNash]

1 has delivered & was the difference b/w winning a premiership, 2 minor premierships & more wins than any other club in the AFL in that timeframe, the other has helped Sydney tread water in the same position.

Tough choice.

 

[Hump 17]

1 has delivered & was the difference b/w winning a premiership, 2 minor premierships & more wins than any other club in the AFL in that timeframe, the other has helped Sydney tread water in the same position.

Tough choice.

Collingwood would have gone back to back with the Mumford Kennedy pairing. Choice is easy.

 

[yummy6]

1 has delivered & was the difference b/w winning a premiership, 2 minor premierships & more wins than any other club in the AFL in that timeframe, the other has helped Sydney tread water in the same position.

Tough choice.

Add any half decent tap ruckman to Collingwood and they're going to be a shot at a flag.

Mumford and Kennedy for mine.

 

[Donakebab]

Mumford is already easily ahead of Jolly, Kennedy is close to if not ahead of Ball, plus both Sydney players have many years ahead of them.

Sydney duo without a second thought.

 

[Vass]

i will trade ball and jolly for Mumford & Kennedy now without a question. However, im not sure we would have one the 2010 flag with Mumford & Kennedy. Ball and Jolly were better for collingwood in 2009, Mumford & Kennedy were better for Sydney in 2009. Now Mumford & Kennedy would be better for both clubs. Both teams have one out on the moves.