So the change is not for the players or the supporters (neither TV or at the game), but for overseas people who have never seen the game. Silly me, that is a common sense argument to change 100 years worth or tradition.i was watching a game with some of my Canadian buddies (cant recall which game), and they were wondering why the jumpers were so similar... it's just common sense dude.

Not having clash jumpers has been one of the many things that has distinguished us from any other sport (American or English). If people from O/S watch long enough to understand some of the rules I'm pretty sure they will be able, like the rest of us, to differentiate between the two teams! Why pander to an overseas audience. If they like it, they should like it for what it is, not what we think they might like.
It's a bad thing because it's NOT NEEDED. It's only for money, and that's not a good enough reason to mess with tradition.i don't see why it's a bad thing to have clubs in completely different colours when playing each other (one dark, one light/one red, one blue etc.)
This may be a minor issue to some. But think about it; not many competitions around the world are this old. Tradition is one of the most important things we have. And if used wisely tradition can be very marketable.
Well, yes it would be at the expense of the home jumper (as you call it). Any game where the players wear an alternative strip, would be at the expense of the original ... it's just common sense dude.it won't be at the expense of the home jumper, which should be sacred, and only away teams should have to change their jumper.








