LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Test cricket I agree not the other forms. Better contract than Agar or Kane Richardson at least
Ongoing Test match XI speculation thread.
- Thread starter cricketnut14
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Test cricket I agree not the other forms. Better contract than Agar or Kane Richardson at least
Worst of the lot if he wasn’t a part of the NSW elite he would have been gone ages ago
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Agar is much worse
Carbine Chaos
The Gaff-er
- Apr 1, 2009
- 63,858
- 93,947
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
A fit Jhye is in front of both Pattinson and Neser. Heck, he makes the team along with Cummins and Hazlewood for me.
- Jan 13, 2015
- 1,524
- 906
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Thread starter
- #2,955
Smith, Warner, Labuschagne, Finch
Green, Maxwell
Agar
Paine, Carey
Cummins, Hazlewood, Starc, Pattinson, J.Richardson, K.Richardson
Lyon, Zampa
I still think Puckovski (if fit) and Head will play the next test match. Maybe they are seen as red ball players only.
Green, Maxwell
Agar
Paine, Carey
Cummins, Hazlewood, Starc, Pattinson, J.Richardson, K.Richardson
Lyon, Zampa
I still think Puckovski (if fit) and Head will play the next test match. Maybe they are seen as red ball players only.
Scratchy05
All Australian
- Sep 16, 2020
- 866
- 670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Head should most definitely play again
Pippen94
Cancelled
- Jun 12, 2019
- 2,670
- 976
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Love how triggered you are about Starc
Burtonsgottago
Premiership Player
- May 5, 2019
- 4,397
- 4,429
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Oh look, you’re from WA
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Only if he gets consistent Shield runs. I've been teased before with Travis. Show us this "form" isn't just a flash in the pan.
What like this year?
LukeParkerno1
Post-Human
Lets see him back it up. No point doing it for a few games then reverting back to the usual Head being a tease.
Scratchy05
All Australian
- Sep 16, 2020
- 866
- 670
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Which he did to finish last year. If he does the same thing again, I see no reason to not pick him, especially as we have no one else outside of Henriques seriously pushing for selection in that position
to1994
Club Legend
- Jul 8, 2015
- 2,658
- 3,043
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Nothing wrong with being a bit more generous with fast bowlers and contracts. They already get the shortest careers for the most part of all cricketers and you don't want to deter youngsters further from taking it up.
Pattinson won't have the career of Cummins but he's a proven performer and with any luck he'll have a Ryan Harris like last few years.
Pattinson won't have the career of Cummins but he's a proven performer and with any luck he'll have a Ryan Harris like last few years.
As opposed to picking guys that do actually the same but aren’t good enough to be tease?
I’m sorry but the cupboard’s just bare imo.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/crick...w/news-story/ba1676639d410bca7e5011d9c6f5662c
If CA have the bottle to look into this again, there could be repercussions.
If CA have the bottle to look into this again, there could be repercussions.
- Sep 15, 2011
- 31,569
- 48,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Said at the time the whole team was up to their necks in it. Not necessarily the use of sandpaper specifically but ball tampering. Should have been an acknowledgement that the practice was widespread, that they took it too far, maybe a couple of games for the main three, but a collective responsibility. Instead, they tried to shield others and it will end up looking like a cover-up.
That said, Bancroft should not be doing interviews to explain the situation if he’s not willing to be 100 per cent honest. Be up front or shut up. It doesn’t rebuild his reputation to still be covering for others or hedging his bets with some statements.
That said, Bancroft should not be doing interviews to explain the situation if he’s not willing to be 100 per cent honest. Be up front or shut up. It doesn’t rebuild his reputation to still be covering for others or hedging his bets with some statements.
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
It's done. The guys ****ed up. They copped a whack and then we took a much tougher stance than other countries have taken. A stance I - to an extent - agreed with. I did think we took it too far. As it so often does in cricket it comes down to the ICC's incompetence and inability to handle things appropriately, and they have feather touched ball tampering for decades.
But it's done. It's over. This shite doesn't achieve anything.
It is stupid that we are talking about SA 2018 again.
Of course Bancroft was the fall guy in many respects, however he was the one stupid enough to put himself in that situation.
Of course Bancroft was the fall guy in many respects, however he was the one stupid enough to put himself in that situation.
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
Quite possibly, hopefully not.
The underarm delivery deserves the attention it gets, albeit the Kiwi's do ham it up a to a degree. But it's status in world cricketing incidents is very unique, and now not repeatable due to law changes.
Ball tampering... Looks the guys copped their whack. It's done. But there are plenty of other defendants in the dock on ball tampering.
Like I said earlier, this has largely came around because the ICC have given ball tampering the feather touch for so long.
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
Tangent question to the masses...
It's a no ball if the ball bounces twice (or maybe three times?)...
So can you still bowl underarm as long is it doesn't bounce twice/thrice?
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,750
- 12,106
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #2,973
Law 21.1.2 Underarm bowling shall not be permitted except by special agreement before the match.
No ball Law | MCC
Official No ball Law. Read the statement of the No ball Law. Understand the rules of No ball Law with e-learning & animations.
- Mar 25, 2003
- 35,681
- 28,334
Poor rule IMO.Law 21.1.2 Underarm bowling shall not be permitted except by special agreement before the match.
No ball Law | MCC
Official No ball Law. Read the statement of the No ball Law. Understand the rules of No ball Law with e-learning & animations.www.lords.org
The double/triple bounce rule should cover it.
If you want to bowl underarm, go for it. As long as it doesn't bounce twice/thrice.
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,750
- 12,106
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #2,975
Just to answer the twice/thrice part, it's not allowed to bounce twice before the popping crease but that's only been the case since 2017. It was allowed to bounce twice before then.
This ball from Andre Adams for example was a fair delivery at the time but would be a no ball now.
Similar threads
