Ottens to CHB??

[cobba]

Ive seen Petrie go from forward to CHB with great results and i reckon Geelong should play Ottens at CHB next season.

Thoughts??

 

[GeeCat]

Petrie and Ottens are very different players.

 

[catempire]

Nup. Had a very good year in the role he played as a ruck-forward.

 

[My5t3r10u5]

What do I reckon? I reckon you're still feeling the effects from Mad Monday!!! Ottens at CHB! You've got to be kidding. Firstly, he's a ruckman (who can play forward). Secondly, our problems are predominantly up forward not down back. What do we gain by playing him back?

 

[brett_go_cats]

What do I reckon? I reckon you're still feeling the effects from Mad Monday!!! Ottens at CHB! You've got to be kidding. Firstly, he's a ruckman (who can play forward). Secondly, our problems are predominantly up forward not down back. What do we gain by playing him back?

Spot on.

 

[Sammy D]

Too slow.

 

[cobba]

Well after watching todays game

Hawkins= FF, Egan/N.Ablett= FP, Mooney= CHF

Scarlett=FB, Harley= BP, Ottens= CHB

Blake/ King= Ruck/INT

 

[cats2rise]

Get out Cobba. That isnt going to happen. Egan is a backman, Ottens will play forward.

 

[Unwritten_Law]

Too slow.

It would work if he could play on Spencer every week /thehoff.

 

[Unwritten_Law]

Well after watching todays game

Hawkins= FF, Egan/N.Ablett= FP, Mooney= CHF

N.Ablett FF, Mooney CHF, Ottens FP, Hawkins VFL.

 

[thehoff]

Ive seen Petrie go from forward to CHB with great results and i reckon Geelong should play Ottens at CHB next season.

Thoughts??

Cobba,

Were you physically beaten as a child? Do you lick windows? If not, go see a Doctor. You need help!, professional help and quick!

 

[mini_me316]

Good luck to Mooney playing CHF for ALL 22 games next year.

Ottens doesn't have the work rate required to play in the backline, he doesn't like to man up or chase.

 

[CF]

Frankly the way Nablett is shaping up I think he could be our next CHF with Mooney going to CHB, Ottens FF/ruck, and hawkins in the VFL for most of the season.

 

[DanA]

Ottens was AA as a backmen. WOuld need to lose weight though and does match team needs.

 

[ben_cats_fan]

Ottens was AA as a backmen. WOuld need to lose weight though and does match team needs.

Actually, if my memory serves me right, he was AA as a FP in 2001

 

[thehoff]

Ottens was AA as a backmen. WOuld need to lose weight though and does match team needs.

WHAT!!???!!!??

He was an All Australian Ruckmen.

 

[malvern]

Yes, that would really improve our run out of the backline....

 

[gaz29]

Nath, Mooney and Ottens as our tall forwards (I think we can leave Hawkins out of the discussion until he's actually played a game..)
Scarlett, Egan and Harley down back.

 

[fugsy]

Why not move Scarlett to FF while we're at it

 

[Belly]

and Kingsley to full back.

 

[winty]

and Kingsley to full back.

For Portarlington reserves

 

[CF]

why don't we just switch them all around, I mean when you are desperate

 

[malvern]

Nath, Mooney and Ottens as our tall forwards (I think we can leave Hawkins out of the discussion until he's actually played a game..)
Scarlett, Egan and Harley down back.

Too conventional...