Pavlich Vs Richardson Poll

[mathew ollaik]

thoughts?

 

[Mattlowry]

Hard to compare i suppose. Pavlich hasnt always (but usually) has played up forward. Much younger. Both play for consistently underperforming teams however.

Probably would be a better idea to look at what they had both achieved by Pavlich's current age. People often forget how good of a player Richo was and can still be.

 

[Upgrayedd]

Hard to compare i suppose. Pavlich hasnt always (but usually) has played up forward. Much younger. Both play for consistently underperforming teams however.

Probably would be a better idea to look at what they had both achieved by Pavlich's current age. People often forget how good of a player Richo was and can still be.

good post, pavlich didnt always play forward, which is why hes only been considered a top forward for the past 2-3 years, if he was developed to a forward early would have kicked more goals then 250 at age 26

 

[lids2004roar]

Richo had kicked 91 goals in a season the year while returning from a knee reco.

Pavlich may be more consistent these days but he is just not capable of that kind of dominance.

Plus it is painful to think that these 2 SHOULD have been playing side by side all these years

Before doing his knee he kicked 27 goals 3 behinds too.

 

[Mattlowry]

Richo had kicked 91 goals in a season the year while returning from a knee reco.

Pavlich may be more consistent these days but he is just not capable of that kind of dominance.

Plus it is painful to think that these 2 SHOULD have been playing side by side all these years

Before doing his knee he kicked 27 goals 3 behinds too.

While i partially agree with you, you have to admit that the game has changed. Full forwards just dont kick as many goals as they used too. I think thats more a reflection of how the game is played, not the skill of those forwards.