Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 5 - Cont. in Part 6

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cool. I'm saying that she's not coming into the season in the best shape for her to play her best football.
If her coach told her that she doesn't need to lose weight why would she go against the opinion of her coach? That seems counter productive, it'd be like if we got Dixon down to the size of marshall, why would you waste the time doing that?
 
If her coach told her that she doesn't need to lose weight why would she go against the opinion of her coach? That seems counter productive, it'd be like if we got Dixon down to the size of marshall, why would you waste the time doing that?

lol I'd sayDixon would probably have a lower BF% than Marshall.


Agree to disagree :thumbsu:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Still stands with the Legends, they play vic vs All Stars because it would be totally and utterly noncompetitive if it was state vs state.
Really? You serious?
 
Plenty of fatter shits than plugger ever was play rugby
Try propping at under 100kg, your scrum would be useless. It's the equivalent of being a tall ruck.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Now, I would need to check previous seasons and compare them, but it seems to be very close to what AFL already does. Still, there seems to be differences.

For instance, in the top, Sydney (1) actually played against HAW (3), GWS (4), WES (7), STK (9), CAR (14). Its 5 doubles follow the same pattern, with games against two top teams, two middle teams, and one bottom team.

In the middle, taking Port (10) as an example, it played against ADE (5), WC (6), COL (12), GC (15), BRI (17). It is also two top, one middle, and two bottom.

However, in the bottom, Essendon (18) played against ADE (5), COL (12), CAR (14), FRE (16), BRI (17). Now, that is a very soft schedule! ESS has faced one top team, one middle team, and three bottom teams (and from the bottom of their tiers). That is different than what I proposed above. Instead of Fremantle and Brisbane, the Bombers would have played against Bulldogs (7) and Tigers (13).
Check out the fixture for top 6, middle 6 and bottom 6 explained. Due to there not being 34 rounds to have every team home and away it's meant to be the top 6 from the previous year have the hardest draws, middle 6 so-so and bottom 6 the easiest. Of course movement of teams every year ensures it doesn't work out that way. Even if it did though it completely messes with the premise that each year is meant to have teams ranked on a 'theoretical' even playing field that only takes the current years performances into account, but doesn't. Unless everyone did get everyone else home and away it's hard to get around, but I'd rather divvy up into 6 groups of 3 teams, assign teams 1-3 as worth 6 points, 4-6 5 points, down to 16-18 1 point and try to get every team scheduled to play teams totally as close to an equal number of points the following season as possible. Usually it's not as bad as bottom 6 sides don't jump from bottom into finals, but it's another artificial leg up for Essendon, as a reward ( :eek: ) for cheating. I hate that club.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Check out the fixture for top 6, middle 6 and bottom 6 explained. Due to there not being 34 rounds to have every team home and away it's meant to be the top 6 from the previous year have the hardest draws, middle 6 so-so and bottom 6 the easiest. Of course movement of teams every year ensures it doesn't work out that way. Even if it did though it completely messes with the premise that each year is meant to have teams ranked on a 'theoretical' even playing field that only takes the current years performances into account, but doesn't. Unless everyone did get everyone else home and away it's hard to get around, but I'd rather divvy up into 6 groups of 3 teams, assign teams 1-3 as worth 6 points, 4-6 5 points, down to 16-18 1 point and try to get every team scheduled to play teams totally as close to an equal number of points the following season as possible. Usually it's not as bad as bottom 6 sides don't jump from bottom into finals, but it's another artificial leg up for Essendon, as a reward ( :eek: ) for cheating. I hate that club.

Not exactly what I did, but if you calculate, you will see that the difference between #1 and #18 wouldn't be that big.
 
Still stands with the Legends, they play vic vs All Stars because it would be totally and utterly noncompetitive if it was state vs state.
Legends game has less competitive integrity than WWE.
It's a feel good charity variety show for Victorians - not sure why it's televised nationally
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top