Discussion Random Discussion

[mightymalaka]

Racism is a 'chronic disease of American society', China says

Chinese officials have hit out at the United States, accusing the country of having severe problems with racism and police violence.

www.sbs.com.au

That is absolutely appalling!
Bad enough how they treat personal freedoms and women over there, but that was a new low in unadulterated racism!
They have become an exceptionally ugly elitist society which is now permeating over here with their numbers!

 

[StCicatriz]

man this news of the states really sucks. anyone else feeling flat about the whole thing?

 

[SaintsSeptember]

That is absolutely appalling!
Bad enough how they treat personal freedoms and women over there, but that was a new low in unadulterated racism!
They have become an exceptionally ugly elitist society which is now permeating over here with their numbers!

They are technically correct.
USA has a problem with Violence. China would repress and arrest those capable of such acts. Tiananman square could easily have escalated but China dealt with it quickly and efficiently.
USA has a problem with racism. China would get rid of those ethnic groups, hence eliminating racism.

 

[Pakenhamsaint]

I've been watching some of the news channels in LA. I've seen 4 police chases in the last 4 hours.

 

[CaptainRisky]

I've been watching some of the news channels in LA. I've seen 4 police chases in the last 4 hours.

Did they crash

 

[gringo2011]

They are technically correct.
USA has a problem with Violence. China would repress and arrest those capable of such acts. Tiananman square could easily have escalated but China dealt with it quickly and efficiently.
USA has a problem with racism. China would get rid of those ethnic groups, hence eliminating racism.

China isn't big on ethnic cleansing, they usually demand that people give up their religion and become part of a greater China. Individual dissenters and trouble makers are usually jailed.

 

[Pakenhamsaint]

Did they crash

No they all stopped and tried running.

 

[MUFKilda]

man this news of the states really sucks. anyone else feeling flat about the whole thing?

Yes, it's history repeating. There have been race riots going back to the Watts riots in 1965, but progress has been painfully slow when it comes to racism and discrimination. It's almost thirty years since the Rodney King riots in L.A. Racial tension remains close to the surface, ready to erupt.

 

[Joffaboy]

China isn't big on ethnic cleansing, they usually demand that people give up their religion and become part of a greater China. Individual dissenters and trouble makers are usually jailed.

Interestingly, the Muslim quarter in Zian has been there for 800 years.
There is also Buddhism, Confusionism, Taoism, and Cristianity.

 

[Kildonan]

My daughter in law is Taiwanese, so I am aware of how the Chinese treat people whom they claim within the borders that the Chinese themselves set. I see the effect they are having on the United Nations in order to appropriate the authority to document the way they do things as the acceptable way to do things recently passing WHO directives such as acceptance of (unproven) traditional chinese medicine (see: The World Health Organization Gives the Nod to Traditional Chinese Medicine. Bad Idea). The Chinese are a huge player in shaping the world - they are expanding their borders at the expense of others and they have a long history of low consideration of individual rights. They are authoritarian, just like the USA and North Korea. Human rights are not a priority.

 

[gringo2011]

My daughter in law is Taiwanese, so I am aware of how the Chinese treat people whom they claim within the borders that the Chinese themselves set. I see the effect they are having on the United Nations in order to appropriate the authority to document the way they do things as the acceptable way to do things recently passing WHO directives such as acceptance of (unproven) traditional chinese medicine (see: The World Health Organization Gives the Nod to Traditional Chinese Medicine. Bad Idea). The Chinese are a huge player in shaping the world - they are expanding their borders at the expense of others and they have a long history of low consideration of individual rights. They are authoritarian, just like the USA and North Korea. Human rights are not a priority.

That is true. It's not a society for the individual. I think we find it hard to accept them as a new world power base because they have a society so removed from what we believe in. The west lost a lot of the freedoms that we once had as soon as communism became a non player IMO. We are tracked, we have had our rights to peaceful protest taken away, we have silenced our media, we have removed lots of the opportunity to move through the classes etc. A lot of the fears we have of them we already have ourselves but we still have the narrative of individual freedom still ringing in our ears. The US has used financial imperialism to rule the world and as that slips away it makes it a pretty uncertain time. A lot of the wealth and privilege of the west is based on gouging the worlds poor. It's not going to be an easy adjustment.

 

[Joffaboy]

That is true. It's not a society for the individual. I think we find it hard to accept them as a new world power base because they have a society so removed from what we believe in. The west lost a lot of the freedoms that we once had as soon as communism became a non player IMO. We are tracked, we have had our rights to peaceful protest taken away, we have silenced our media, we have removed lots of the opportunity to move through the classes etc. A lot of the fears we have of them we already have ourselves but we still have the narrative of individual freedom still ringing in our ears. The US has used financial imperialism to rule the world and as that slips away it makes it a pretty uncertain time. A lot of the wealth and privilege of the west is based on gouging the worlds poor. It's not going to be an easy adjustment.

Dead right it is not a country for the individual. Some of that is cultural (Asian countries are horizontal collective cultures to degrees) while lot is one party domination and state ownership of land.

Travelling through China in late 2016, I was awed by the sheer scale of the country and it s modernisation, bearing in mind I was a dilettante tourist, however we saw a lot in 15 days of mainly rail travel. Most amazing country I have ever been to.

However the people are cowed. Our tour guides would not engage in any conversation that related to China, and fair enough, they have to live there.

The guides on the Yangtze were the most interesting. It was flooded for the three gorges dam project (which incidently gives power to more than 50 million people). When asked where they lived, they would point down, but would be at pains to tell us how wonderful their new concrete apartment was in the tower blocks in their new towns. Sure there would be some truth in having the new mod cons, but your could tell they did not want to critisise losing their village.

China has lifted its citizens out of abject poverty, and has created wealth for hundreds of millions, but there is a price individually. When there is 1.4 billion individualism is not what it is in a country like Australia.

 

[Stewart66]

Dead right it is not a country for the individual. Some of that is cultural (Asian countries are horizontal collective cultures to degrees) while lot is one party domination and state ownership of land.

Travelling through China in late 2016, I was awed by the sheer scale of the country and it s modernisation, bearing in mind I was a dilettante tourist, however we saw a lot in 15 days of mainly rail travel. Most amazing country I have ever been to.

However the people are cowed. Our tour guides would not engage in any conversation that related to China, and fair enough, they have to live there.

The guides on the Yangtze were the most interesting. It was flooded for the three gorges dam project (which incidently gives power to more than 50 million people). When asked where they lived, they would point down, but would be at pains to tell us how wonderful their new concrete apartment was in the tower blocks in their new towns. Sure there would be some truth in having the new mod cons, but your could tell they did not want to critisise losing their village.

China has lifted its citizens out of abject poverty, and has created wealth for hundreds of millions, but there is a price individually. When there is 1.4 billion individualism is not what it is in a country like Australia.

Agree with most of what you are saying Joff , but having dealt with them in the Tourism industry
they were always big picture to deal with , always courteous to a fault similar to Japanese
but the worst thing you can do is embarrass them publicly making them lose face , quiet thoughtful
conciliatory approach it is in their DNA .

In contrast dealing with USA Tourism Industry was dealing with brash born to rule mentality .

 

[pebblesofsand]

It only confirms my suspicions about USA that such a disgraceful human being can become the elected leader of the country.

 

[mightymalaka]

It only confirms my suspicions about USA that such a disgraceful human being can become the elected leader of the country.

Yep! The capitalist system at it's worst!
And under that system they got the leader they deserve!

Tis a shame though. I've been to the States many times and for the most part the masses are good peeps!

 

[SaintsSeptember]

It only confirms my suspicions about USA that such a disgraceful human being can become the elected leader of the country.

Its hard to look back and find any actual good ones.

When they did the referendum for becoming a republic i could never understand the people who wanted a popularly elected leader. It was the argument for this that really derailed the move to becoming a republic. Could they not see what a mess the American's were, but they still wanted to be like them.

Before Trump we had.

Obama,
George W. .
Clinton .
George HW Bush
Reagan
Carter
Ford
Nixon
Johnson
Kennedy

I used to think they were a total funny farm, but now in light of Trump , they all seem like competent sane choices.

 

[BigPowerForward]

It only confirms my suspicions about USA that such a disgraceful human being can become the elected leader of the country.

If we are on the subject of USA and disgraceful, then the US meat industry is a great example. The meat packaging industry in the USA is controlled by 4 major players who have formed a cartel. They not only control the price paid at the checkout but they also control the price paid to cattle ranchers. These companies make billions & billions of dollars profit per annum, yet the cattle ranchers are struggling to survive. What is the US governments proposed solution to the problem? We need an assistance package for the cattle ranchers. Fcuking brilliant.... so now, not only is the consumer being royally screwed on price at the checkout, but their taxes will be used to help maintain the profits of a cartel.

We have a situation here with Coles & Woolworths screwing suppliers on price and then excessively marking up the product to make huge profits.The cosmetic standards of the supermarkets are causing the wastage of perfectly good food and also increasing the price at the checkout.
You can also add milk, petrol, utilities, and health insurance into the mix...... Things need to change in this country or our standard of living will just continue to erode and more and more people will fall below the poverty line.

 

[mightymalaka]

Its hard to look back and find any actual good ones.

When they did the referendum for becoming a republic i could never understand the people who wanted a popularly elected leader. It was the argument for this that really derailed the move to becoming a republic. Could they not see what a mess the American's were, but they still wanted to be like them.

Before Trump we had.

Obama,
George W. .
Clinton .
George HW Bush
Reagan
Carter
Ford
Nixon
Johnson
Kennedy

I used to think they were a total funny farm, but now in light of Trump , they all seem like competent sane choices.

Don't think i would be calling Nixon a competent sane choice!
As a matter of fact it's a pretty sick and sorry list all round with the possible exception of the book ends on there!

But your right the Donald has brought his own special brand of insanity to the White house!

 

[SaintsSeptember]

Don't think i would be calling Nixon a competent sane choice!
As a matter of fact it's a pretty sick and sorry list all round with the possible exception of the book ends on there!

But your right the Donald has brought his own special brand of insanity to the White house!

I don't think Kennedy would have lasted a year under today's media conditions. He was hiding plenty.
Nixon was a bizarre individual, certainly not stupid, but just way out there.

 

[Joffaboy]

Sweden admits it stuffs up

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

 

[CaptainRisky]

Agree with most of what you are saying Joff , but having dealt with them in the Tourism industry
they were always big picture to deal with , always courteous to a fault similar to Japanese
but the worst thing you can do is embarrass them publicly making them lose face , quiet thoughtful
conciliatory approach it is in their DNA .

In contrast dealing with USA Tourism Industry was dealing with brash born to rule mentality .

We have , well used to have a lot of groups before Covit be it adults or school kids stay at our hotel from Japan and China and they are always polite , the groups from the US , Plain hard work and F ing rude

 

[pebblesofsand]

So if you're rich enough to be able to spend between $150K and $750K on a "renovation" then you are entitled to a govt handout - FMD this is so so wrong!!!

Means-tested HomeBuilder grant to require minimum $150k spend

The Federal Government will give eligible Australians $25,000 to build or substantially renovate their homes, in an effort to boost demand in the construction sector and keep builders employed, provided they spend at least $150,000 of their own money.

www.abc.net.au

 

[SaintsSeptember]

So if you're rich enough to be able to spend between $150K and $750K on a "renovation" then you are entitled to a govt handout - FMD this is so so wrong!!!

Means-tested HomeBuilder grant to require minimum $150k spend

The Federal Government will give eligible Australians $25,000 to build or substantially renovate their homes, in an effort to boost demand in the construction sector and keep builders employed, provided they spend at least $150,000 of their own money.

www.abc.net.au

Yep and self employed tradies who have done really well during our crazy long housing boom, can handle a downturn, like taking a pay cut.
Those who lost their jobs won't get employment from this scheme and won't be able to renovate.
More cash to the cashed up bogans.

 

[Moral Decay]

So if you're rich enough to be able to spend between $150K and $750K on a "renovation" then you are entitled to a govt handout - FMD this is so so wrong!!!

Means-tested HomeBuilder grant to require minimum $150k spend

The Federal Government will give eligible Australians $25,000 to build or substantially renovate their homes, in an effort to boost demand in the construction sector and keep builders employed, provided they spend at least $150,000 of their own money.

www.abc.net.au

Gee I wonder who the voter demographic is?

 

[George]

So if you're rich enough to be able to spend between $150K and $750K on a "renovation" then you are entitled to a govt handout - FMD this is so so wrong!!!

Means-tested HomeBuilder grant to require minimum $150k spend

The Federal Government will give eligible Australians $25,000 to build or substantially renovate their homes, in an effort to boost demand in the construction sector and keep builders employed, provided they spend at least $150,000 of their own money.

www.abc.net.au

Haha, they are absolutely hopeless aren't they.