Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Regular Non Eagles Discussion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Biggie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
..and now Collingwood double down on blaming Treloar's Mrs for the predicament.

QONVIyz.gif
 
If Treloar needs any help getting over his pain at being kicked out of the Pies, at least he can take solace in being such a massive part of the GOAT play that ended Collingwood's premiership hopes in 2018.

He will always be a WCE legend. Love ya Ads!
 
06Premiers said:
If Treloar needs any help getting over his pain at being kicked out of the Pies, at least he can take solace in being such a massive part of the GOAT play that ended Collingwood's premiership hopes in 2018.

He will always be a WCE legend. Love ya Ads!
Click to expand...

Heard Simmo is sending him a medal and a WCE membership package.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

squashface said:
Jordan Gallucci delisted. I remember when we were linked to him in his draft year. Vanilla supreme.
Click to expand...
**** you beat me to it ya dawg
 
The pressure on the kids drafted with the treloar and stevo picks will be pretty immense.

It will be delicious if there is an inverse Jack Watts Queens Bday situation if they prematurely debut them in a game against Melbourne.

Not that anyone from that game probably remains in Melbourne’s best 22
 
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
* Cameron could’ve been free in 12 months. As if that has any bearing on the situation.
* Cameron only kicked 17 goals this year, despite the fact he had a career best year only last season.
* TK came off an AA year and finished second in their BnF, while that isn’t the case for Cameron. This is despite the fact that Cameron has a Coleman, 2 AA jackets, a BnF, is an 8x leading goalkicker for GWS, and is a gun key forward.
* Geelong held “all the power“ because TK only played for 2 years, despite the fact that means they were effectively treating him as a piece of meat to be moved around for profit.
* Because Cameron is an RFA, that means anything above the compensation one gets for him is a bonus, despite the fact GWS literally matched the bid, which means how it should be doesn’t matter anymore.
* Cameron will be 28 at the start of next year, while TK was only 25 at the start of 2020, despite the fact TK turned 26 during this season and will be 27 by August next year, while Cameron, a KPF, is just starting to entire his prime in his late 20s.
* The PD trade is actually equivalent because he was a free agent, despite the fact Geelong massively underpaid for Danger, Adelaide didn‘t match, and the point I’m making is that it’s hypocritical for their posters to say that GWS are being unreasonable when they asked the world for Kelly. It’s specific to the comparison I’m making, so it isn’t fair to say that I‘m drawing a loose connection here. The TK trade only happened last ****ing year, and the one they did with JC included a pick we gave them.

Also, because they downgraded their pick at 33 to 37, and gave us two picks in the 50s back, that “cancels out” the additional second we gave them, for some reason.

And because I let slip something that might be considered “baiting“ (saying they treated TK like an animal), their posters hyper focused on it for nearly 3 pages, and yet they blame me for only focusing on Kelly. And then when I finally get to a point where I’m actually discussing how it relates to Cameron, as my original post was trying to do, beyond all of them telling me to **** off and whatnot, their mod says the trades aren’t “equivalent“ because she says so, pretty much.

I also, myself, literally removed the sentence from the original post and asked permission to elaborate on it since they were all focusing on it pretty exclusively, and then didn‘t actually expand on it, because it seemed they were now actually responding to my post, and then I got banned.

I’ve been debating in my mind whether I should actually talk about this, but it just really ****ing pisses me off how blind they are to their own bullshit. What a bunch of massive campaigners.
 
Last edited:
CM9000 said:
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
.... What a bunch of massive campaigners.
Click to expand...

Not BOMC. BODE
 
CM9000 said:
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
* Cameron could’ve been free in 12 months. As if that has any bearing on the situation.
* Cameron only kicked 17 goals this year, despite the fact he had a career best year only last season.
* TK came off an AA year and finished second in their BnF, while that isn’t the case for Cameron. This is despite the fact that Cameron has a Coleman, 2 AA jackets, a BnF, is an 8x leading goalkicker for GWS, and is a gun key forward.
* Geelong held “all the power“ because TK only played for 2 years, despite the fact that means they were effectively treating him as a piece of meat to be moved around for profit.
* Because Cameron is an RFA, that means anything above the compensation one gets for him is a bonus, despite the fact GWS literally matched the bid, which means how it should be doesn’t matter anymore.
* Cameron will be 28 at the start of next year, while TK was only 25 at the start of 2020, despite the fact TK turned 26 during this season and will be 27 by August next year, while Cameron, a KPF, is just starting to entire his prime in his late 20s.
* The PD trade is actually equivalent because he was a free agent, despite the fact Geelong massively underpaid for Danger, Adelaide didn‘t match, and the point I’m making is that it’s hypocritical for their posters to say that GWS are being unreasonable when they asked the world for Kelly. It’s specific to the comparison I’m making, so it isn’t fair to say that I‘m drawing a loose connection here. The TK trade only happened last ******* year, and the one they did with JC included a pick we gave them.

Also, because they downgraded their pick at 33 to 37, and gave us two picks in the 50s back, that “cancels out” the additional second we gave them, for some reason.

And because I let slip something that might be considered “baiting“ (saying they treated TK like an animal), their posters hyper focused on it for nearly 3 pages, and yet they blame me for only focusing on Kelly. And then when I finally get to a point where I’m actually discussing how it relates to Cameron, as my original post was trying to do, beyond all of them telling me to fu** off and whatnot, their mod says the trades aren’t “equivalent“ because she says so, pretty much.

I also, myself, literally removed the sentence from the original post and asked permission to elaborate on it since they were all focusing on it pretty exclusively, and then didn‘t actually expand on it, because it seemed they were now actually responding to my post, and then I got banned.

I’ve been debating in my mind whether I should actually talk about this, but it just really ******* pisses me off how blind they are to their own bullshit. What a bunch of massive campaigners.
Click to expand...
My advice

Walk away.

Head to the Sydney board and keep an eye on Hickster :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

CM9000 said:
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
* Cameron could’ve been free in 12 months. As if that has any bearing on the situation.
* Cameron only kicked 17 goals this year, despite the fact he had a career best year only last season.
* TK came off an AA year and finished second in their BnF, while that isn’t the case for Cameron. This is despite the fact that Cameron has a Coleman, 2 AA jackets, a BnF, is an 8x leading goalkicker for GWS, and is a gun key forward.
* Geelong held “all the power“ because TK only played for 2 years, despite the fact that means they were effectively treating him as a piece of meat to be moved around for profit.
* Because Cameron is an RFA, that means anything above the compensation one gets for him is a bonus, despite the fact GWS literally matched the bid, which means how it should be doesn’t matter anymore.
* Cameron will be 28 at the start of next year, while TK was only 25 at the start of 2020, despite the fact TK turned 26 during this season and will be 27 by August next year, while Cameron, a KPF, is just starting to entire his prime in his late 20s.
* The PD trade is actually equivalent because he was a free agent, despite the fact Geelong massively underpaid for Danger, Adelaide didn‘t match, and the point I’m making is that it’s hypocritical for their posters to say that GWS are being unreasonable when they asked the world for Kelly. It’s specific to the comparison I’m making, so it isn’t fair to say that I‘m drawing a loose connection here. The TK trade only happened last ******* year, and the one they did with JC included a pick we gave them.

Also, because they downgraded their pick at 33 to 37, and gave us two picks in the 50s back, that “cancels out” the additional second we gave them, for some reason.

And because I let slip something that might be considered “baiting“ (saying they treated TK like an animal), their posters hyper focused on it for nearly 3 pages, and yet they blame me for only focusing on Kelly. And then when I finally get to a point where I’m actually discussing how it relates to Cameron, as my original post was trying to do, beyond all of them telling me to fu** off and whatnot, their mod says the trades aren’t “equivalent“ because she says so, pretty much.

I also, myself, literally removed the sentence from the original post and asked permission to elaborate on it since they were all focusing on it pretty exclusively, and then didn‘t actually expand on it, because it seemed they were now actually responding to my post, and then I got banned.

I’ve been debating in my mind whether I should actually talk about this, but it just really ******* pisses me off how blind they are to their own bullshit. What a bunch of massive campaigners.
Click to expand...
E9599D06-B7D8-46D6-8D93-989847CE0DF8.jpeg
 
Why didn't they try and offload Grundy to get Cameron?

Like I know Grundy is a gun player, but Collingwood have been crying out for a ready made FF for years. Pop Cameron next to DeGoey and Stephenson/Elliot and you've got a quality forward line, or send DeGoey into the middle along with Pendles, Sidebottom, Adams, and Treloar and you'd essentially be carpet bombing your forward line. **** Cox off from his $650K per year and you're sorted?

With a midfield like that you can shark taps for days, even pinch someone like Goldstein for a year or two as a stop gap while you build another ruck up.

And all of this ready to go before you even hit the draft, or raid your academy.

I mean it's all very easy for me to say from behind a computer (with a cinnamon bun and a cup of tea in front of me) but surely giving away Phillips, Treloar and Stephenson for absolute ****ing peanuts can't have been a better option...
 
Benji85 said:
Why didn't they try and offload Grundy to get Cameron?

Like I know Grundy is a gun player, but Collingwood have been crying out for a ready made FF for years. Pop Cameron next to DeGoey and Stephenson/Elliot and you've got a quality forward line, or send DeGoey into the middle along with Pendles, Sidebottom, Adams, and Treloar and you'd essentially be carpet bombing your forward line. fu** Cox off from his $650K per year and you're sorted?

With a midfield like that you can shark taps for days, even pinch someone like Goldstein for a year or two as a stop gap while you build another ruck up.

And all of this ready to go before you even hit the draft, or raid your academy.

I mean it's all very easy for me to say from behind a computer (with a cinnamon bun and a cup of tea in front of me) but surely giving away Phillips, Treloar and Stephenson for absolute ******* peanuts can't have been a better option...
Click to expand...

From what I've heard Buckley invited the fire-sale 3 to his BBQ and they didn't bring a plate or even their own booze. After that the writing was on the whiteboard.
 
El_ahrairah said:
From what I've heard Buckley invited the fire-sale 3 to his BBQ and they didn't bring a plate or even their own booze. After that the writing was on the whiteboard.
Click to expand...
I bet Treloar was filing up his glass of red from a bottle in kept in the car. Probably bought Jatz instead of Ritz too. Some things can never be forgiven
 
Benji85 said:
I bet Treloar was filing up his glass of red from a bottle in kept in the car. Probably bought Jatz instead of Ritz too. Some things can never be forgiven
Click to expand...

Jatz = instant delist
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

CM9000 said:
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
* Cameron could’ve been free in 12 months. As if that has any bearing on the situation.
* Cameron only kicked 17 goals this year, despite the fact he had a career best year only last season.
* TK came off an AA year and finished second in their BnF, while that isn’t the case for Cameron. This is despite the fact that Cameron has a Coleman, 2 AA jackets, a BnF, is an 8x leading goalkicker for GWS, and is a gun key forward.
* Geelong held “all the power“ because TK only played for 2 years, despite the fact that means they were effectively treating him as a piece of meat to be moved around for profit.
* Because Cameron is an RFA, that means anything above the compensation one gets for him is a bonus, despite the fact GWS literally matched the bid, which means how it should be doesn’t matter anymore.
* Cameron will be 28 at the start of next year, while TK was only 25 at the start of 2020, despite the fact TK turned 26 during this season and will be 27 by August next year, while Cameron, a KPF, is just starting to entire his prime in his late 20s.
* The PD trade is actually equivalent because he was a free agent, despite the fact Geelong massively underpaid for Danger, Adelaide didn‘t match, and the point I’m making is that it’s hypocritical for their posters to say that GWS are being unreasonable when they asked the world for Kelly. It’s specific to the comparison I’m making, so it isn’t fair to say that I‘m drawing a loose connection here. The TK trade only happened last ******* year, and the one they did with JC included a pick we gave them.

Also, because they downgraded their pick at 33 to 37, and gave us two picks in the 50s back, that “cancels out” the additional second we gave them, for some reason.

And because I let slip something that might be considered “baiting“ (saying they treated TK like an animal), their posters hyper focused on it for nearly 3 pages, and yet they blame me for only focusing on Kelly. And then when I finally get to a point where I’m actually discussing how it relates to Cameron, as my original post was trying to do, beyond all of them telling me to fu** off and whatnot, their mod says the trades aren’t “equivalent“ because she says so, pretty much.

I also, myself, literally removed the sentence from the original post and asked permission to elaborate on it since they were all focusing on it pretty exclusively, and then didn‘t actually expand on it, because it seemed they were now actually responding to my post, and then I got banned.

I’ve been debating in my mind whether I should actually talk about this, but it just really ******* pisses me off how blind they are to their own bullshit. What a bunch of massive campaigners.
Click to expand...

Geelong is a slightly more inbred version of Mandurah.

They drink the bath water they just bathed with their sister in.
 
CM9000 said:
Man, the goddamn Geelong board are killing me. Apparently the TK scenario and the Cameron trade weren’t equivalent because:
* Cameron could’ve been free in 12 months. As if that has any bearing on the situation.
* Cameron only kicked 17 goals this year, despite the fact he had a career best year only last season.
* TK came off an AA year and finished second in their BnF, while that isn’t the case for Cameron. This is despite the fact that Cameron has a Coleman, 2 AA jackets, a BnF, is an 8x leading goalkicker for GWS, and is a gun key forward.
* Geelong held “all the power“ because TK only played for 2 years, despite the fact that means they were effectively treating him as a piece of meat to be moved around for profit.
* Because Cameron is an RFA, that means anything above the compensation one gets for him is a bonus, despite the fact GWS literally matched the bid, which means how it should be doesn’t matter anymore.
* Cameron will be 28 at the start of next year, while TK was only 25 at the start of 2020, despite the fact TK turned 26 during this season and will be 27 by August next year, while Cameron, a KPF, is just starting to entire his prime in his late 20s.
* The PD trade is actually equivalent because he was a free agent, despite the fact Geelong massively underpaid for Danger, Adelaide didn‘t match, and the point I’m making is that it’s hypocritical for their posters to say that GWS are being unreasonable when they asked the world for Kelly. It’s specific to the comparison I’m making, so it isn’t fair to say that I‘m drawing a loose connection here. The TK trade only happened last ******* year, and the one they did with JC included a pick we gave them.

Also, because they downgraded their pick at 33 to 37, and gave us two picks in the 50s back, that “cancels out” the additional second we gave them, for some reason.

And because I let slip something that might be considered “baiting“ (saying they treated TK like an animal), their posters hyper focused on it for nearly 3 pages, and yet they blame me for only focusing on Kelly. And then when I finally get to a point where I’m actually discussing how it relates to Cameron, as my original post was trying to do, beyond all of them telling me to fu** off and whatnot, their mod says the trades aren’t “equivalent“ because she says so, pretty much.

I also, myself, literally removed the sentence from the original post and asked permission to elaborate on it since they were all focusing on it pretty exclusively, and then didn‘t actually expand on it, because it seemed they were now actually responding to my post, and then I got banned.

I’ve been debating in my mind whether I should actually talk about this, but it just really ******* pisses me off how blind they are to their own bullshit. What a bunch of massive campaigners.
Click to expand...
They're a bunch of all round DHs, I remember quite a few of us getting red cards for laughing emojis on their board during the TK debacle!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

squashface
    • Like
Oppo Camp Non-Eagles Discussion 2026
309 310 311 312 313
Replies
8K
Views
214K
MeltMan
MeltMan
Keys
    • Like
    • Wow
  • Locked
Oppo Camp Non-Eagles Discussion 2025
687 688 689 690 691
Replies
17K
Views
588K
DorothyG
DorothyG
Keys
  • Locked
Oppo Camp Non-Eagles Discussion 2025 Part 2
184 185 186 187 188
Replies
5K
Views
188K
The Dodger
The Dodger
PerthBoy86
Why have the Eagles lacked long haired players?
2
Replies
37
Views
876
bUCKET__
bUCKET__
RustyShacklefordFalcon
    • Like
The Official Eagles EPL Thread ⚽
2 3 4 5 6
Replies
133
Views
4K
TY24
TY24
txbyhull
    • Like
Competitions West Coast Eagles Board AFL Fantasy & Supercoach 2026
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
Old and Gold
O
swingdog
Tickets for non-members
Replies
1
Views
278
Mop
Mop

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom