Richmond drafting - explains a lot

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

It's not material. It's fact

Your bizarre obsession with Cuningham is fact.

To call the drafting of Cuningham poor and a missed opportunity is not fact, it is opinion and nothing more.

This is all a bit sad really. Richmond have unfortunately ****ed up yet again but your first reaction is to try deflect that failure on to Carlton.

You're very bitter about something...and it'd be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.
 
Can't tell after 1 season

But yes at this stage I would prefer Dunkley
Cripps, Gibbs, Murphy, Curnow the elder. Even Curnow the younger.
All capable midfielders, but none with a lot of pace
Cuningham over Dunkley made perfect sense. You guys are slow and need speed and he adds it.
No different to us taking Morgan over guys like Mathieson, Balic, etc. We needed pace and took a kid who may take longer.

At the time, Yarran smacked of Richmond being desperate to land a household name after missing Treloar.
He was a good enough player to give up a pick in the teens for though. So while its unfortunate they didn't get to see him on the park, no one knew this was coming.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top