- Joined
- Oct 2, 2002
- Posts
- 3,306
- Reaction score
- 507
- Location
- * . . port lincoln
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Seattle SuperSonics
you're a bad influence, antOriginally posted by ant
Everyone's a pessimist nowadays.....welcome to my world people!

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

you're a bad influence, antOriginally posted by ant
Everyone's a pessimist nowadays.....welcome to my world people!

Whoops, forgot he had transferred clubs last year!Originally posted by redandblack
Don't think Glenelg would be too happy about Schuback playing for Westies, Kane.

I don't get emotional after 1 game! However, need to be realistic after 4 games & say we are in big strife at making the finals. Need to be a minimum of 4-7 at the half way mark to make the finals IMO. Wouldn't be putting my house on it!Originally posted by ok.crows
And to think Kane you thought I was just being pessimistic after round 1.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Would be happy with that as long as the other 2 changes are made. Sarge must play!Originally posted by Stiffy_18
I think that Schuback does need a run in SANFL but there is a fair chance that he will be kept in the side. We are playing at the Telstra Dome and you probably need a bit of pace on that ground. I would keep him in. Torney still has a fair way to go before he reclaims some match fitness.
Coughlan was on The Sunday Footy Show and said he wasn't carrying an injury but there has been a lot of talk that he is OP I reckon we'd be better off resting him but I can't see Frawley and Co biting the bullet. He's struggled this year whether its because of an injury or more expectation on him I can't be sure perhaps a combination of both. He didn't have one clearance on Sat. night which was his strength last year so I've got him playing across half-forward which at least gives us someone who'll work hard to keep the ball in the area.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Kretchy, would the Tigers be better off with Coughlan starting on the ball?
Sad to hear Cogs has OP. In a bit of a catch-22 in that you need to play him, but his injury then won't get any better.Originally posted by kretchy
Coughlan was on The Sunday Footy Show and said he wasn't carrying an injury but there has been a lot of talk that he is OP I reckon we'd be better off resting him but I can't see Frawley and Co biting the bullet. He's struggled this year whether its because of an injury or more expectation on him I can't be sure perhaps a combination of both. He didn't have one clearance on Sat. night which was his strength last year so I've got him playing across half-forward which at least gives us someone who'll work hard to keep the ball in the area.
Until Sat night Johnson had been our best player for the season and needs to start in the middle. Krakouer deserves some reward for consistent performances. Newman will tag someone, I know McLeod has been struglling with form but I think he can be more damaging than Ricciuto and is the one that needs to be watched closely. Having said that Newman would be better suited to playing on Riccuito.
I agree.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Would be happy with that as long as the other 2 changes are made. Sarge must play!
Yep a shocker from Bowden which is the reason he copes so much stick from the tiger fans because he can produce a best on ground performance for us one week and then play a shocker the next week. Really frustrating when a bloke has a heap of talent but doesn't get the best out of himself consistently. Pettifer didn't get a heap of ground time I wouldn't be suprised if he gets another chance this week. Another frustrating player features regularly in the best in the VFL but can't do the same in the big league is too easily intimidated.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Krakouer looks like he is taking the next step, but it's a pity the same can't be said about Pettifer! Did Bowden play a shocker on the WE, as he would have been close to your best the previous week?

Originally posted by bluecrow
So, who's going to the game?
Has been ruled out along with Hart (which we already knew).Originally posted by Stiffy_18
According to Ch10 Reilly has failed a fitness test and is unlikely to play on friday.
Well this just about says that Schuback SHOULD stay in the side.Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Has been ruled out along with Hart (which we already knew).
Agree Stiffy. Would like to see Schuey play at least a half of footy.Originally posted by Stiffy_18
Well this just about says that Schuback SHOULD stay in the side.
Knowing how desperate AFC is we will give Burns a run.
Originally posted by Coach Required
My boys from punt road will play the crows back into a top 8 form.
We have a great habit of getting teams back onto the winners list, crows fans after your big win this friday night you will all look back at the end of the season and pin point this game as the one that turned your season around.
The tigers will be lucky to win another game this year and who ever loses to us needs a bullet.
Originally posted by bluecrow
I really want to, but I'm supposed to be working til 9pmI've had 2 days off already this week cos of exams...so I don't think they'll be too happy if I have another. And I can't come to Geelong the week after
So i miss the first 3 games in Melbourne
![]()
![]()

I agree 100%Originally posted by McAlmanac
This has danger game written all over it. Why?
The Melbourne papers have been awash with "Richmond in Crisis" type stories. That is worrying. Rohan Connolly reckons the club should announce now that Frawley won't be re-appointed for next year, reckons that they have sub-standard players - named names to boot. Terry Wallet says that they play too safe, don't take risks.
Nothing more galvanising than being written off, with the added support of a home crowd to roar them along (they might eat their own at Tigerland, but when they get a sniff, their fans are very loud). I know the same pressure is on in Adelaide, but home city advantage might mean something here.