Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

[NaturalDisaster]

its sad that this is the very best our current admin can come up with

Im glad I voted Hoff for admin

Admins don't get elected for their wit, idiot.

 

[Metalcrusher]

The majority of the team sheet offences are useless and we should get rid of them.

But if we have them then they should all be points penalties or something accumulating to an eventual points penalty.

Unless it directly impacts the validity/functioning of the SIM I completely concur.

 

[Metalcrusher]

Admins don't get elected for their wit, idiot.

Well obviously in your instance. I think Kennedy Parker has you well and truly covered in both the wit and intellect department

 

[Ned_Flanders]

Admins don't get elected for their wit, idiot.

No shit, otherwise Hoff would be admin

 

[damicky]

Admins don't get elected for their wit, idiot.

What do you offer instead of wit?

 

[NaturalDisaster]

What do you offer instead of wit?

Good question.

I'll think and get back to you.

 

[Ned_Flanders]

Unless it directly impacts the validity/functioning of the SIM I completely concur.

How many seasons have you been on committee?

How many times have you proposed changes to these specific rules?

 

[Metalcrusher]

How many seasons have you been on committee?

How many times have you proposed changes to these specific rules?

Not quite one season as I was suspended a fair whack last season and this one has only started. I am in discussions atm on the proposed changes. How long have you been around to impact any meaningful change Ned?

Or do you just like to piss and moan and hear your own voice?

 

[Ned_Flanders]

Not quite one season as I was suspended a fair whack last season and this one has only started. I am in discussions atm on the proposed changes. How long have you been around to impact any meaningful change Ned?

I have no issue with the penalties. If you **** up, wear it. It adds to the drama, and keeps LGs accountable

As for being suspended, that's a cop out and you know it. You could have effected change via your proxy.

 

[Metalcrusher]

I have no issue with the penalties. If you fu** up, wear it. It adds to the drama, and keeps LGs accountable

As for being suspended, that's a cop out and you know it. You could have effected change via your proxy.

Good luck talking to Blue after 9pm at night bwahahahahahahahaha

PS: Love ya gutz BLUEALLTHRU

 

[Metalcrusher]

I have no issue with the penalties. If you fu** up, wear it. It adds to the drama, and keeps LGs accountable

As for being suspended, that's a cop out and you know it. You could have effected change via your proxy.

So to answer my own question directed at you, you did absolutely 5/8ths of **** all. You were a passenger that just like to argue rather than impact positive, meaningful change for the league ...

Got it mate

 

[Kennedy Parker]

Well obviously in your instance. I think Kennedy Parker has you well and truly covered in both the wit and intellect department

To be honest, you'd probably be hard pressed to find anyone in the league who does NOT have NaturalDisaster covered in wit and intellect... well maybe TROGLODYTE

 

[philreich]

Wednesday is problematic for us .. we can never be sure someone won't get banned in any given 24 period lol!

Plus its my late Bingo night at the RSL.

I really enjoy nude bingo at our RSL: eyes down at 7.30pm, and pants down at 8pm.......

 

[Ned_Flanders]

So to answer my own question directed at you, you did absolutely 5/8ths of fu** all. You were a passenger that just like to argue rather than impact positive, meaningful change for the league ...

Got it mate

I actually was pretty active in committee

You can accuse me of a lot, but being a passenger in there is not one

 

[Metalcrusher]

I actually was pretty active in committee

You can accuse me of a lot, but being a passenger in there is not one

So .. enlighten me, what changes did you facilitate?

 

[PMBangers]

I'm just glad that we've opened discourse here, once again I am pushing the league forward

 

[beez]

I'm just glad that we've opened discourse here, once again I am pushing the league forward

And your team backwards.

 

[Ned_Flanders]

So .. enlighten me, what changes did you facilitate?

I was the one who came up with the consensus model for the all SFA.

I was also involved in the changes around transition of players to other clubs in season, that one as a result of bomber stupidity.

 

[Metalcrusher]

I was the one who came up with the consensus model for the all SFA.

I was also involved in the changes around transition of players to other clubs in season, that one as a result of bomber stupidity.

Oh you mean me?

 

[Ned_Flanders]

Oh you mean me?

There were actually two that season.

And as for you, you will recall I told you exactly what was going on.

 

[Metalcrusher]

There were actually two that season.

And as for you, you will recall I told you exactly what was going on.

I am thrilled I was an inspiration for you to drive change Ned You make me proud.

 

[Ned_Flanders]

I am thrilled I was an inspiration for you to drive change Ned You make me proud.

Nope

For me it's always been about 1) the rule of the day has to be followed, and 2) if it's a bad rule, change the rule.

Your issue was one club was giving you very bad advice on how to change clubs. I told you how to do it, and why they would tell you what they did.

One thing that bugs me is the committee is there to make the league better. I argued a lot with The Filth Wizard manangatang and TheInjuryFactory , but one thing I hope we all agreed on was each of us was thinking "what is best for the league"

Those who do SFA in committee but bitch about the outcomes, or try to **** decisions over for their own clubs benefit add no value to the process.

Multiple times my LG instructed me to vote against the advice I gave them. BUT it was my job to give my advice and why I believed it was right.

Too often people want the easy path. Arguing something that's not, but that may be better, is much harder.

Whether I was a good committee member and rep for the furies is for others to judge, BUT my intention was to be a voice for the Furies to improve the league. I hope I came close to achieving that.

 

[ClarkeM]

Nope

For me it's always been about 1) the rule of the day has to be followed, and 2) if it's a bad rule, change the rule.

Your issue was one club was giving you very bad advice on how to change clubs. I told you how to do it, and why they would tell you what they did.

One thing that bugs me is the committee is there to make the league better. I argued a lot with The Filth Wizard manangatang and TheInjuryFactory , but one thing I hope we all agreed on was each of us was thinking "what is best for the league"

Those who do SFA in committee but b*tch about the outcomes, or try to fu** decisions over for their own clubs benefit add no value to the process.

Multiple times my LG instructed me to vote against the advice I gave them. BUT it was my job to give my advice and why I believed it was right.

Too often people want the easy path. Arguing something that's not, but that may be better, is much harder.

Whether I was a good committee member and rep for the furies is for others to judge, BUT my intention was to be a voice for the Furies to improve the league. I hope I came close to achieving that.

I’m so proud of you for starting sentences (and finishing them in general too) with uppercase letters.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

I argued a lot with @The Filth Wizard @manangatang and @TheInjuryFactory , but one thing I hope we all agreed on was each of us was thinking "what is best for the league"

100% mate.

 

[philreich]

When will the Bears punishment be overturned?

When Vladimir Putin is voted world leader of the year.