Scott Stevens vs Brett Ebert

[Good Win]

Who has had a better career so far?

BigFooty, you decide!

 

[tboy2464]

Based on statistics, Ebert
Based on talent, Ebert
Based on skill, Ebert
Based on common sense, Ebert

Stevens is the biggest dud to come out of the crows. (Yes including Taylor Walker)

 

[Doctor Feel]

Did you lose a bet or something? haha.

Steven's isnt a spud, hes an okay utility.
On sheer talent, Ebert by a few flemingtons.

 

[Power King]

ebert has at least had one really top quality season.

 

[El_Scorcho]

Considered voting Stevens for the lulz...

'Next on Good Win's series of Polls, Andrew McLeod vs Matt Thomas.'

 

[tribey]

Hands down worst poll since this bloke:

 

[Schulzenfest]

facepalm.jpg

 

[happy_punter]

ebert, has done so much more!

 

[Slattery_20]

Ebert's the only guy in the league who's bubble-head toy is in perfect proportion.

 

[Pilchard_Adams]

Stevens easily

Bobblehead has had 1 decent year in 2007. Very inconsistant. Probably wears pillows out very quickly due to the weight of his head too.

Stevens is consistant, stops his forward opponent more often than not, and when thrown forward actually kicks goals

 

[Schulzenfest]

Stevens easily

1-18 says different. You don't think you might just be a wittle biased?

 

[Chief Crow]

one is a reliable utility that doesn't get much attention from the wider footy community.
The other is a inconsistant small forward that gets attention due to his last name.

 

[Schulzenfest]

Ebert is inconsistent, Stevens is consistently average. I know who I (and 19 out of 23 people) would rather.