Seriously how does Richmond remain so soft EVERY YEAR !!!

[Bentleigh]

Why?????, because its your recent history. You think just because you didn't qualify bottom 4 once in the past 4 years you can forget, Dont you remember all those times you milked the draft. ogh sorry traded away your picks to win the spoon in 2004.

If you want recent History then

Richmond = 1 game out of 8
Hawks = more hand of picks

Wrong answer

I am starting to understand the phrase 'the truth hurts'

Hawthorn 9 > Richmond 8

I have never seen a spoon in my life, its a shame you cant say the same, what is it 2 spoons in the past 16 years for Richmond.

Richmond have won 10 flags, Hawthorn 9.

15th/14th is alot different from the spoon

 

[dipper86]

If you want recent History then

Richmond = 1 game out of 8
Hawks = more hand of picks

Dont you mean Richmond more top 8 picks than Hawthorn for being pathetic for a longer amount of time.

I am starting to understand the phrase 'the truth hurts'

You should by now, thats been the story of your life.

Richmond have won 10 flags, Hawthorn 9.

Hawthorn 9 Flags, Richmond 8.

15th/14th is alot different from the spoon

Still struggling to understand the concept of finishing last.
Deal with it.

16th = last = spoon = another draft pick for Richmond.

 

[Bentleigh]

Hawthorn 9 Flags, Richmond 8.

Alright - thats enough for me.

Can't argue with someone living in their own little world.

 

[dipper86]

Alright - thats enough for me.

Can't argue with someone living in their own little world.

ogh Benteigh!!! dont be like that. Now you finally understand what we all go through when we have to read your dribble.

Thanks for being my b*tch and for taking a dose of your own medicine.

 

[tigerdan]

Dont you mean Richmond more top 8 picks that Hawthorn for being pathetic.



You should by now, thats been the story of your life.




Hawthorn 9 Flags, Richmond 8.



Still struggling to understand the concept of finishing last.
Deal with it.

16th = last = spoon = another draft pick for Richmond.

I know you think you're fighting the good fight Dipper but on every KPI (except maybe brownlow medalists), the Tigers are better than the Hawks.

All those jokes about poo and wee must have made you all bitter and twisted over the years.

By the way - you guys haven't even bottomed out yet, so don't get too smug about spoons...

 

[Croat tiger]

Dont you mean Richmond more top 8 picks that Hawthorn for being pathetic.



You should by now, thats been the story of your life.




Hawthorn 9 Flags, Richmond 8.



Still struggling to understand the concept of finishing last.
Deal with it.

16th = last = spoon = another draft pick for Richmond.

can you twist this one around too dipper ,tigers 81 wins dawks 61.lmfao!

 

[OneEyedHawk]

This is why I disagree with the 'very similar' postion statement. Just last season - We missed the finals by a game. Hawthorn got extra top 3 picks for being poo.

geez, you're a d1khead.

You've finished bottom 4 and below us every year in recent history, yet because one year you finish above us and 'leapfrog' up to 10th, suddenly you're in a completely different league and can't even be compared to us.

And stop going on about draft picks you moron. A supporter from any club, and I may be able to wear that but...
How many bottom 4 finishes, hence early draft picks, have you got the last few years?

 

[Croat tiger]

I know you think you're fighting the good fight Dipper but on every KPI (except maybe brownlow medalists), the Tigers are better than the Hawks.

All those jokes about poo and wee must have made you all bitter and twisted over the years.

By the way - you guys haven't even bottomed out yet, so don't get too smug about spoons...

And recruiting a jockey for a coach.

 

[Bentleigh]

I know you think you're fighting the good fight Dipper but on every KPI (except maybe brownlow medalists), the Tigers are better than the Hawks.
All those jokes about poo and wee must have made you all bitter and twisted over the years.

By the way - you guys haven't even bottomed out yet, so don't get too smug about spoons...

Hawthorn - Brownlow Medallists:
Col Austen 1949;
Robert Dipierdomenico 1986;
John Platten 1987;
Shane Crawford 1999

(4 total)


Richmond - Brownlow Medallists:
Stan Judkins 1930
W. ‘Bill’ Morris 1948;
Roy Wright 1952 & 1954;
Ian Stewart 1971

(5 total)

 

[dipper86]

I know you think you're fighting the good fight Dipper but on every KPI (except maybe brownlow medalists), the Tigers are better than the Hawks.

No good fight here. Just truth.
Hawthorn > Richmond.

All those jokes about poo and wee must have made you all bitter and twisted over the years.

Same goes, i suppose 25 years of being down the bottom spitting on your coach, burning and throwing away your memberships and dumping manure outside your football headquearters has been very soothing for your mind.

By the way - you guys haven't even bottomed out yet, so don't get too smug about spoons...

I think we have, I know your wishing for us to sink so low, but its not going to happen.

 

[dipper86]

can you twist this one around too dipper ,tigers 81 wins dawks 61.lmfao!

I like you man, I dont care what people said about that portrait of yourself you once used as your avatar.

Your a winner in my book bud.

 

[Hawks88bestever]

I like you man, I dont care what people said about that portrait of yourself you once used as your avatar.

Your a winner in my book bud.

I think tigerboys should bring that old avatar back, I could use a good laugh

 

[Bentleigh]

Facts. Nothing more - nothing less.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=222603

 

[Kurtis G]

Funny how you hawk munts only go back 4 years and not 5 to when we finished 3rd in the competition.

Bentleigh has called it exactly how it is Dipper. I am going to sepll this out for you....

Richmond have won more flags than Hawthorn.

Ok? I know you seem to be on this acid trip that makes you think that the flag tally only counts from when you joined the league, but if you want to play like that, how about you take out all of Hawthorns flags between 1981 and 2005. It would be the same thing as you are doing.

Richmond have earned LESS, I repeat... LESS spoons than Hawthorn. That means your team has finished on the bottom of the ladder more times than ours. You cannot argue with that.

Richmond have a BETTER head to head record over your side.

Richmond have beaten Hawthorn 81 times, Hawthorn have beaten Richmond 61 times.

They are three very important stats which you just cannot argue with, and all of your attempts to do so come across as extremely feeble. You continue to refer back to our recent history, which is ok because naturally you need something to hang your hat on when confronted with these stats, but bag us all you want about the spoon in 2004, because in reality, YOU WERE ONLY ONE PERCENTAGE POINT ABOVE US! So if your bagging us so much, it hardly says anything good about your bogan mod.

And as for the number one pick in 2004, I am not in favour of tanking, I am simply saying that picking up Deledio definantly brought a positive side to finishing bottom.

Get a brain for f*ck sake.

 

[Bentleigh]

..

I am going to sepll this out for you

 

[Kurtis G]

..

LOL! Classic. Im a knob.

Typo guys, typo.

 

[dipper86]

Another sucker has decided to join the party.

Funny how you hawk munts only go back 4 years and not 5 to when we finished 3rd in the competition.

No need to mention that because we were both good at the time.

Bentleigh has called it exactly how it is Dipper. I am going to sepll this out for you....

Richmond have won more flags than Hawthorn.

Ok? I know you seem to be on this acid trip that makes you think that the flag tally only counts from when you joined the league but if you want to play like that, how about you take out all of Hawthorns flags between 1981 and 2005. It would be the same thing as you are doing.

Why would i take out the flags from 81 to 95, We were both in the VFL, hence: Since Hawthorn and Richmond have competed in the VFL together.

Hawthorn 9 > Richmond 8.

Richmond have earned LESS, I repeat... LESS spoons than Hawthorn. That means your team has finished on the bottom of the ladder more times than ours. You cannot argue with that.

And yet we haven't one a spoon in my life time, I'm still waiting for you to say the same.

They are three very important stats which you just cannot argue with, and all of your attempts to do so come across as extremely feeble. You continue to refer back to our recent history, which is ok because naturally you need something to hang your hat on when confronted with these stats,

I don't need to, its just there to make people like you waste their time writing an essay about the topic.

but bag us all you want about the spoon in 2004, because in reality, YOU WERE ONLY ONE PERCENTAGE POINT ABOVE US!

It still doesn't change the fact you finished 16th and have a nice polished wooden spoon to prove it.

So if your bagging us so much, it hardly says anything good about your bogan mod.

Bogan??? hmmm, somebody should look in there own back yard.
Toothless spitting manure dumping yobbos preety much covers it.

And as for the number one pick in 2004, I am not in favour of tanking, I am simply saying that picking up Deledio definantly brought a positive side to finishing bottom.

No, what your saying is your happy you tanked and won the spoon which brought the reward of securing Deledio.


Yep that preety much covers it.

Get a brain for f*ck sake.

Thats not nice, calm down your getting too worked up.

 

[Kurtis G]

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL! @ U!!!!!!!!!!

Answer me this then.....

Why is there no need to refer to 2001 (when we finished HIGHER than you) because we both were good at the time. BUT you are all for mentioning 2004, when we were both ******** at the time. Finishing one percentage point above a side you claim to be sh*t is nothing to be proud of you ignoramous.

LOL! @ u again!

 

[Bentleigh]

Answer me this then.....

Why is there no need to refer to 2001 (when we finished HIGHER than you) because we both were good at the time. BUT you are all for mentioning 2004, when we were both ******** at the time. Finishing one percentage point above a side you claim to be sh*t is nothing to be proud of you ignoramous.

Thats one point which I thought I making but I thought better of it.

 

[dipper86]

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL! @ U!!!!!!!!!!

Answer me this then.....

Why is there no need to refer to 2001 (when we finished HIGHER than you) because we both were good at the time. BUT you are all for mentioning 2004, when we were both ******** at the time. Finishing one percentage point above a side you claim to be sh*t is nothing to be proud of you ignoramous.

LOL! @ u again!

We both made Preliminary finals, thats all that counts at the end of the day.
Even if you put that into the stats, the avgs dont lie. You still have been sh*tter.



You winning the spoon and finsihing 16th is also what counts at the end of the day.

Thank-you come again.

 

[Bentleigh]

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4571193&postcount=1

We both made Preliminary finals, thats all that counts at the end of the day.

As opposed we both finshed on 4 wins, 18 loses in 2004, within 0.25% of 70percentage.

 

[Kurtis G]

Your not even worth arguing with now Dipper86. Youve just gone silly.

 

[dipper86]

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4571193&postcount=1



As opposed we both finshed on 4 wins, 18 loses in 2004, within 0.25% of 70percentage.

which = Hawthorn 15th and Richmond 16th and taking home a polished wood grain wooden spoon.

 

[dipper86]

Your not even worth arguing with now Dipper86. Youve just gone silly.

argh loser talk now, preety much sums up Richmonds tanking effort of 2004. looks like its rubbed off to its supportes, hmm 25 years of being no where will do that to you.

I pity you.

 

[Kurtis G]

You are the thickest person I have ever come across on here.

I can imagine you sitting at your computer with your c*ck half out realising that you are owned by Richmond and with a smug look on your face ignoring the facts and hyocrtically typing the same thing over and over and laughing in that kinda way as to say that you dont really think its funny but you need something to hold off for a few minutes before "going to bed" and never posting in this thread again.

How can you say that 2001 doesnt matter because we both did well, but then go on to claim that 2004 matters, even though we both done sh*t?

LOL at you.