Shuey or Fyfe
- Thread starter The Bomb
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
i loled.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
- Posts
- 11,288
- Reaction score
- 851
- Location
- Melbs
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Manchester United, New York Knicks
I really hope you're trolling.
Mayne: 15th in the league for tackles so far this year with 19, 11 scoring shots, 20 marks. Good stats for a guy who plays as a leading HFF and whose role is to apply pressure and prevent the HBF getting a quick break after a turnover.
Don't make me laugh saying Ebert and Masten are better/more important.
Don't make me laugh saying Ebert and Masten are better/more important.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Patronij1 has clearly embarrassed herself in this thread... Mayne is a gun. I cannot actually believe there are people out that there that compare him to McGinnity 
And Fyfe featuring prominently in AFLCA award voting once again this weekend. Keep in mind as well that he is 19 (15 months younger than Schuey) and built like a twig
And Fyfe featuring prominently in AFLCA award voting once again this weekend. Keep in mind as well that he is 19 (15 months younger than Schuey) and built like a twig
58% disposal efficiency which is what fyfe has this year which is statistically below average. How is stating that a troll?
Mgginity's role is to tag. He's done that pretty decently this year. Doesn't mean he aint a spud. As irrelevant as this is to this thread mayne is simply just not a good player. I understand how hard that is for you to admit to an eagles supporter.
Patronij1 has clearly embarrassed herself in this thread... Mayne is a gun. I cannot actually believe there are people out that there that compare him to McGinnity
And Fyfe featuring prominently in AFLCA award voting once again this weekend. Keep in mind as well that he is 19 (15 months younger than Schuey) and built like a twig
Thinking mayne is a gun is embarrassing and delusional. He plays a role in your team just like Mginnity does for the eagles that is all. That does not in any way make either of them good players. If mayne was at the eagles i would not want him to get a game. Just like i dont want mginnihack to get one either.
We really should stop this banter. Its irrelevant to the thread agree to disagree. Your point about fyfe being younger and less built is something to consider in comparing the two. I could also argue that shuey has played a lot less games, has been impacted heavily by injury and has not gotten his fitness levels up to that of fyfe's as yet.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2009
- Posts
- 17,583
- Reaction score
- 12,920
- Location
- Manchester
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth Demons, Liverpool
They're both guns. I haven't seen enough of Fyfe unforunately.
Neither side I'm guessing would trade one for the other, which suggests they're pretty closely rated.
Neither side I'm guessing would trade one for the other, which suggests they're pretty closely rated.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
- Posts
- 11,288
- Reaction score
- 851
- Location
- Melbs
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Manchester United, New York Knicks
You're either stupid for thinking that stat is relevant, or realise how ridiculous is it and trolling.
Either one.
subaman
Team Captain
You say that Eber & Masten are better than Mayne but carry on about DE %. Masten chops to ribbons just about every footy he gets, he is a butcher of the highest order.
The stat is very relevant when comparing disposal between players of similar positions and kick/handball ratios. 58% DE is low no matter where you play on the ground.
Mastens DE this year is currently 100%... admittedly from 5 possessions but his disposal was very good in the preseason and has improved very much from last year. Shows what you know. Ebert is the butcher of the ball but even he has improved his disposal this year. This is all completely irrelevant to the thread.
The thread is about fyfe and shuey. Atm shuey's disposal is obviously better and that is an area that fyfe needs to work on.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
- Posts
- 11,288
- Reaction score
- 851
- Location
- Melbs
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Manchester United, New York Knicks
No it isn't.
Mayne is one of our first picked and we have a lot better side than you
Watch him closely in the derby because it's clear you've never watched him properly 
- Banned
- #66
instead of looking at stats maybe watch a few games.....you are clueless
instead of looking at stats maybe watch a few games.....you are clueless
I Normally watch every game every week. From that i have learnt that fyfe's disposal would be his biggest weakness at this stage. Stats happen to reflect it. Stop being so defensive no player is perfect especially in their 2nd year and learn to critically assess players on your team without just saying every player is perfect on your team.
great rebuttle. care to elaborate?
Mayne is one of our first picked and we have a lot better side than you
He reminds me of Mckinley... Too short to be a KPF too immobile to be a small. And kicks at goal like mckinley did after his first season.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Posts
- 4,430
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Chelsea
- Banned
- #70
Mayne is a good player. But by no means a 'gun'.
Seems a bit selfish around goals though and doesnt always take the right option in the F50. Reminds me of a much better version of McKinley (ie. more agile and chases, good mark for his size, decent kick).
From what I've seen of Darling so far, would prefer Darling over Mayne though for sure.
Seems a bit selfish around goals though and doesnt always take the right option in the F50. Reminds me of a much better version of McKinley (ie. more agile and chases, good mark for his size, decent kick).
From what I've seen of Darling so far, would prefer Darling over Mayne though for sure.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
- Posts
- 11,288
- Reaction score
- 851
- Location
- Melbs
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Manchester United, New York Knicks
1- Disposal efficiency doesn't take into account the difficulty of the kick. For example, Didak often has a disposal efficiency lower than most on the Collingwood team (yes, even similar position players) because he tries the lower percentage plays. I think most can agree he's clearly the best kick on the Collingwood team though.
2- An effective disposal can still be a poor option, or be of poor execution. A hospital kick or handpass that reaches the target but sells them out would be considered effective. Ignoring an open target in the corridor to chip the ball to another guy on the boundary line would technically be seen an effective when it isn't.
Disposal efficiency stats are terrible.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
- Posts
- 11,288
- Reaction score
- 851
- Location
- Melbs
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Manchester United, New York Knicks
I agree with this. Definitely better than McKinley, but Darling is clearly a better prospect.
There are a number of criticisms you could make of Mayne, but being selfish around goal is not one of them.
Too often he gives it off when he is in a perfectly acceptable position to have a shot.
Lmao at comparing Mckinley to Mayne, if you hadn't given away that you don't know what you're on about, that seals it. Mckinley couldn't cement a spot in a poor side because he refused to chase and had zero desire for the contest. Mayne may well be too undersized to be a genuine KPF and he sure as hell frustrates dockers fans with his set shots, but the dude is a relentless tackler and harasser and is among our first picked because of it. Our forward line efficiency is built on our zone structure and ability to pressure the ball handler and guys like Mayne, Ballantyne and Deboer are worth their weight in gold to our team because of this. The goals they kick are bonuses more than anything.
Similar threads
