Re: So, you believe in conspiracy theories, do you? You probably also think you're the Emperor of Pl
GG, spare me the first year physchoanalysis, I'm not holding a "poker face" when I'm not telling you my percentage.
Figgy and I have had many debate on religious matters. Yet even though I've got some strong opinions on the topic, I'd never try to boil down my opinion to a number, belief and knowledge trascend simple numbers gg. Nor would I ask figgy for a number of how strong he thinks his belief or knowledge is, because it's a pointless question. So please stop asking me, because I aint playing that game. Where I say oh, 90%, then you say "oooooh, but see, the 10%, that means you do have some place for the conspiracy see!" I hope you can understand that.
It's interesting that you pick on the 911 commission for not providing all the details yet when pressed for details yourself, you say "oh, how would I know, they haven't released damaging evidence yet". Firstly you claim to know, now you don't. Secondly, you seem to hold out possibility because until they reveal the secret, it's all unknown! What could be true is that no conspiracy story will ever be revealed because... there is none. If you're truly logical and reasoned, you need to analyse the opposition, yourself and then the truth to come up with an answer. Seems like you're very sure about yourself, any possibility of being wrong is dismissed from the outset. Which is not reason.
Figgy is disagreeing with you. Figgy is an unorthodox guy, if you sat figgy infront of an average joe and made fig explain his views, the joe would meet some unusual views to say the least. My point is, figgy is not afraid of thinking the radical conspiracy stuff, yet even him, in a display of his finest logic, disagrees with you, for very good reasons. If you think the only people who disagree with you are narrow-minded people who swallow the media grub whole, you're wrong.
I understand that providing numbers isnt an accurate science or representation...
GG, spare me the first year physchoanalysis, I'm not holding a "poker face" when I'm not telling you my percentage.
Figgy and I have had many debate on religious matters. Yet even though I've got some strong opinions on the topic, I'd never try to boil down my opinion to a number, belief and knowledge trascend simple numbers gg. Nor would I ask figgy for a number of how strong he thinks his belief or knowledge is, because it's a pointless question. So please stop asking me, because I aint playing that game. Where I say oh, 90%, then you say "oooooh, but see, the 10%, that means you do have some place for the conspiracy see!" I hope you can understand that.
It's interesting that you pick on the 911 commission for not providing all the details yet when pressed for details yourself, you say "oh, how would I know, they haven't released damaging evidence yet". Firstly you claim to know, now you don't. Secondly, you seem to hold out possibility because until they reveal the secret, it's all unknown! What could be true is that no conspiracy story will ever be revealed because... there is none. If you're truly logical and reasoned, you need to analyse the opposition, yourself and then the truth to come up with an answer. Seems like you're very sure about yourself, any possibility of being wrong is dismissed from the outset. Which is not reason.
Figgy is disagreeing with you. Figgy is an unorthodox guy, if you sat figgy infront of an average joe and made fig explain his views, the joe would meet some unusual views to say the least. My point is, figgy is not afraid of thinking the radical conspiracy stuff, yet even him, in a display of his finest logic, disagrees with you, for very good reasons. If you think the only people who disagree with you are narrow-minded people who swallow the media grub whole, you're wrong.