- Joined
- Sep 12, 2013
- Posts
- 5,219
- Reaction score
- 5,357
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Well, I wouldn't call it accurate when only two of those players came from an academy but you've never seemed particularly bright.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Well, I wouldn't call it accurate when only two of those players came from an academy but you've never seemed particularly bright.
Well you wouldn't have those two without the academy, wouldn't want to be ungrateful if I were you.Well, I wouldn't call it accurate when only two of those players came from an academy but you've never seemed particularly bright.
Yes, just ignore the fact that your post was almost entirely wrong, why don't you.Well you wouldn't have those two without the academy, wouldn't want to be ungrateful if I were you.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Why would I thank the academy for the five players that didn't come through it though?Well you wouldn't have those two without the academy, wouldn't want to be ungrateful if I were you.
I hadnt realised how stark the posession and marks differential was. The Hawk plan copied by Cats of denying them the ball and spreading wide worked a treat. The concern for Swans was that Longmire didnt seem to change anything to counterLongmire can't cope with the keepings off style of football. The one commonality of the Hawthorn games and the Geelong game was the marks. in those 3 games the opposition got at least twice as many marks as the Swans, and the Swans couldn't cope. Longmire has no idea how to stop it. I have no doubt almost every team will try that tactic in 2018, though I think only the top 4 or 5 clubs could pull it off. Either way though, if Longmire can't learn to counter it, our finals in 2018 are going to be very short.
Yes, just ignore the fact that your post was almost entirely wrong, why don't you.
Since they play like 9? Games a year at the scg which is the size of a netball court, they'll probably keep being in finals with a contested 2005 roos game plan.
Sydney are completely mentally broken after 2014 and 2016.
Horse is beaten too many times in the coaches box. He's not an elite coach. He's a one trick pony with the privilege of coaching an elite list who has coughed up two golden opportunities.
Parker, Rohan, Jack etc. go missing far too often in big games.
You do realise that the best way to stop it is to deny them the ball, you got killed at stopages.Longmire can't cope with the keepings off style of football. The one commonality of the Hawthorn games and the Geelong game was the marks. in those 3 games the opposition got at least twice as many marks as the Swans, and the Swans couldn't cope. Longmire has no idea how to stop it. I have no doubt almost every team will try that tactic in 2018, though I think only the top 4 or 5 clubs could pull it off. Either way though, if Longmire can't learn to counter it, our finals in 2018 are going to be very short.
The advantages they have continue to be underplayed. Yeah they built a great culture and have some great home grown players and those they traded in for unders (eg Kennedy).
But they've had the luxury of the Tippett trade being a bust and it not affecting them due to COLA (yes I know that's wound down/gone now but was a factor at the time) which allowed them to pinch Buddy as well as taking 2 top 3 picks in Heeney and Mills for way unders due to the academy zones. There was also some trickery around Jack being drafted which the AFL looked the other way on.
For mine Longmire has underachieved considering the advantages he's got although to be fair they were crucified by the umps in last year's GF. The 0-6 start this year seems unforgiveable from the outside and has cost them a golden opportunity at redemption for last year's loss.
How DO you counter it?I hadnt realised how stark the posession and marks differential was. The Hawk plan copied by Cats of denying them the ball and spreading wide worked a treat. The concern for Swans was that Longmire didnt seem to change anything to counter
1 on 1How DO you counter it?
Asking for a friend...
2014?
Trickery around Jack being taken in the 50's of the rookie draft?
Jack jnr was allowed to enter the rookie draft after claiming his registration papers for the preceding national draft had been lost in the mail. It is a condition of entry for the rookie draft that a player must have registered for a previous draft. A statutory declaration to this effect was signed.
Both Kieren and Garry Jack have subsequently - and independently - told journalists that, in fact, no such registration was ever submitted because the family was ignorant of the AFL draft protocol. Garry Jack told the Herald's Roy Masters in September that it was only in the days before the rookie draft that Sydney informed the family Kieren was ineligible and would be forced to sit out 12 months.
Yep agreeHawks 2014 team would completely ream the Doggies of 2016. That is the one that got away for Sydney.
Yep agree
2016 was swans for the taking
With McVeigh the only one retiring (I think?) and blooding a lot of youth the last two years and still making a GF and a semi in that time - I think they're well placed.
A decent second forward would really take them places.
Longmuire would make a great assistant under Buckley.