Dubai Quacker
Wily Old Campaigner
Every team has off-days, but I found the Freo game (that I attended) & the Hawks game to be the two most worrying, as we were beaten tactically (rather than just being flat or having a bad day).A reasonable take that if we don't lose the four games we should have won (including the EF) things could have been very different and that we need to sort out why that happened and overcome it in order to improve.
I have no doubt that Horse is right to focus on contested ball as one issue but I wonder as to the rest.
I was at the Hawks game. We had been using Dawson in particular to kick long over half back which had been working really well. Hawks stationed McEvoy and Ceglar on each side of the ground and choked us. We couldn't outmark them. We seemed to have no plan B. We developed one pretty quickly which worked very well, running the ball out much more, moving McInerney and Blakey back.
That game IMO we were outcoached.
The EF we choked. Two key leaders missing?
The Saints and GC games I don't know.
In both cases, our “Plan A” wasn’t working - but we didn’t find an alternate quickly enough to win the day.
Kiama Chris’ analysis of the Hawks game is spot-on.
And as for Freo - they clogged the corridor & forced us to bomb long into 50. We were rendered impotent. For the whole game.
The biggest risk this year is that more opposition coaches study what made us successful last year (quick ball movement) & find a plan to shut it down - as did Longmuir & Clarkson.
Having said that - Horse is no mug.
In Horse we trust.
Last edited: