Taylor Walker - racist

[Laphroaig]

Wrong, oh OK? Well, aside from discovering later the valid reason why Dad's name was not on our family assets, the title on our holiday shack, which I inherited did not have his name anywhere near it and I recall when we sold the block next door to a developer, Dad wasn't even in the country...

How pompous.

Congratulations on coming from a wealthy and priveleged background - even though you did nothing to create it, still congratulations.

Congratulations on that translating into coming from a family which might have been able to be on the cutting edge of utilising the Whitlam reform process in the 70s. Even though you did nothing about that either.

However. Your arrogant and entitled statement that none of these things ever happened to anyone anytime is still flat out WRONG. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

By the way. At the time I purchased my own first home my grandfather was a guarantor on the loan. His name was never on the title.

I even took the trouble to give you the year when the changes began, which apparently went straight through to the keeper. But at least you had the chance to boast about your family assets.

Might play out well in a room (as far as you believe anyway) , but in a chat room it just makes you look like a campaigner.

 

[Crabapplepittard]

Wrong, oh OK? Well, aside from discovering later the valid reason why Dad's name was not on our family assets, the title on our holiday shack, which I inherited did not have his name anywhere near it and I recall when we sold the block next door to a developer, Dad wasn't even in the country...

My dad once owned a VK commodore.

 

[Laphroaig]

My dad once owned a VK commodore.

I call bullshit.

 

[maryjames]

I wonder if the Adelaide official in hindsight would act in the same way after seeing the damage done to Tex and the effect it's had on him

He probably sick of Texas racist rants over the time

 

[deanc]

How pompous.

Congratulations on coming from a wealthy and priveleged background - even though you did nothing to create it, still congratulations.

Congratulations on that translating into coming from a family which might have been able to be on the cutting edge of utilising the Whitlam reform process in the 70s. Even though you did nothing about that either.

However. Your arrogant and entitled statement that none of these things ever happened to anyone anytime is still flat out WRONG. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

By the way. At the time I purchased my own first home my grandfather was a guarantor on the loan. His name was never on the title.

I even took the trouble to give you the year when the changes began, which apparently went straight through to the keeper. But at least you had the chance to boast about your family assets.

Might play out well in a room (as far as you believe anyway) , but in a chat room it just makes you look like a campaigner.

Wealthy, boast - say what..?
We lived in a tiny house, I shared a room with my younger sister for most of my childhood, we all attended public schools, I was the first child in our family to leave the state in 1978! We had a scrawny backyard with a Hills hoist, a rabbit cage and one Christmas Dad and mates installed one of those plactic lined above ground swimming pools that used to collapse every time you leant of the thin metal surround, yeah real luxury lifestyle stuff! I mean we were barely middle class - sorry if my posts have somehow been interpreted otherwise.
FYI, the block next door was essentially a gift and our holiday shack was a run down rat infested timber structure with an outside toilet and my older sister slept in the car during our first few visits, such was it's 'comfort'...

But my main point remains; if a women had a steady job and a level of financial independence then securing a loan was generally not a difficult task - and I'm not sure what/how the politics or the related policies of the day had any tangible influence with financial intuitions assessment of risk...?

 

[Laphroaig]

But my main point remains; if a women had a steady job and a level of financial independence then securing a loan was generally not a difficult task - and I'm not sure what/how the politics or the related policies of the day had any tangible influence with financial intuitions assessment of risk...?

So speaking of ownership of the family home, and the block next door and the holiday house and selling some of it off later to developers is a statement of a humble background?

You're either backpedalling or you have your head so far up your arse it ain't ever coming out of there.

The pre 1972 discrimination against women was cultural. Unlike today, until around the mid 80s dealing out loans was almost entirely at the discretion of the bank branch manager. He alone made the decision. And the pre 1972 (when such discrimination was legislated to be unlawful) the decision in the case of single, separated or divorced women was almost invariably NO. Unless a man countersigned. It didn't stop immediately, and endured to some extent until the time where banks took the power out of the manager's hands.

It was also generally no for married women too. In the case of property finance it is still usual for the bank to require both signatures, for quite sensible reasons. The difference is that back in the day a man could get a home loan without his spouse being involved, a woman couldn't.

It's a fact, it happened, and your fairy tale that it didn't is was and always will be wrong.

 

[IKE TURNER]

Ironic that Nova Peris has called for Tex to be sacked coming from someone who got her political job under dubious circumstances and used tax payers money to fly her boyfriend from America so they could do the Tim tam thing

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

So speaking of ownership of the family home, and the block next door and the holiday house and selling some of it off later to developers is a statement of a humble background?

You're either backpedalling or you have your head so far up your arse it ain't ever coming out of there.

I didn’t interpret it like that at all and he even explained it clearly enough in the same way I understood it in the first place.

Take a breather, mate.

 

[deanc]

So speaking of ownership of the family home, and the block next door and the holiday house and selling some of it off later to developers is a statement of a humble background?

You're either backpedalling or you have your head so far up your arse it ain't ever coming out of there.

The pre 1972 discrimination against women was cultural. Unlike today, until around the mid 80s dealing out loans was almost entirely at the discretion of the bank branch manager. He alone made the decision. And the pre 1972 (when such discrimination was legislated to be unlawful) the decision in the case of single, separated or divorced women was almost invariably NO. Unless a man countersigned. It didn't stop immediately, and endured to some extent until the time where banks took the power out of the manager's hands.

It was also generally no for married women too. In the case of property finance it is still usual for the bank to require both signatures, for quite sensible reasons. The difference is that back in the day a man could get a home loan without his spouse being involved, a woman couldn't.

It's a fact, it happened, and your fairy tale that it didn't is was and always will be wrong.

My family background is mainly irrelevant and my only mention of it was to highlight that I've seen the former property titles in my mothers name.

Agree, the bank managers had the power, but you're still ignoring the fact most women were housewives back then and rarely had any financial assets and/or capital and/or the ability to replay a loan...!
Which is the main reason a man could get a home loan without his spouse being involved and if the man was unemployed then obviously neither of them would even get past the application stage.

I'm also aware there was a certain level of discrimination back then, but I think you'll find financial risk management was a key component of this.

Also, I'm not quite sure what you hope to achieve by making insults, as this exchange and previous others we've had always seem include them...?

 

[fumbler]

You can take the boy out of Broken Hill but you can't take the racism out of the boy.

 

[LightTower4]

Wealthy, boast - say what..?
We lived in a tiny house, I shared a room with my younger sister for most of my childhood, we all attended public schools, I was the first child in our family to leave the state in 1978! We had a scrawny backyard with a Hills hoist, a rabbit cage and one Christmas Dad and mates installed one of those plactic lined above ground swimming pools that used to collapse every time you leant of the thin metal surround, yeah real luxury lifestyle stuff! I mean we were barely middle class - sorry if my posts have somehow been interpreted otherwise.
FYI, the block next door was essentially a gift and our holiday shack was a run down rat infested timber structure with an outside toilet and my older sister slept in the car during our first few visits, such was it's 'comfort'...

But my main point remains; if a women had a steady job and a level of financial independence then securing a loan was generally not a difficult task - and I'm not sure what/how the politics or the related policies of the day had any tangible influence with financial intuitions assessment of risk...?

 

[chopflop]

So speaking of ownership of the family home, and the block next door and the holiday house and selling some of it off later to developers is a statement of a humble background?

You're either backpedalling or you have your head so far up your arse it ain't ever coming out of there.

The pre 1972 discrimination against women was cultural. Unlike today, until around the mid 80s dealing out loans was almost entirely at the discretion of the bank branch manager. He alone made the decision. And the pre 1972 (when such discrimination was legislated to be unlawful) the decision in the case of single, separated or divorced women was almost invariably NO. Unless a man countersigned. It didn't stop immediately, and endured to some extent until the time where banks took the power out of the manager's hands.

It was also generally no for married women too. In the case of property finance it is still usual for the bank to require both signatures, for quite sensible reasons. The difference is that back in the day a man could get a home loan without his spouse being involved, a woman couldn't.

It's a fact, it happened, and your fairy tale that it didn't is was and always will be wrong.

Facts. Happened with my grandma. A 20 something divorcee in the late 50s

 

[Laphroaig]

My family background is mainly irrelevant and my only mention of it was to highlight that I've seen the former property titles in my mothers name.

Have you seen the loan documents?

Agree, the bank managers had the power, but you're still ignoring the fact most women were housewives back then and rarely had any financial assets and/or capital and/or the ability to replay a loan...!
Which is the main reason a man could get a home loan without his spouse being involved and if the man was unemployed then obviously neither of them would even get past the application stage.

Apart from the fact that the housewife excuse was already becoming bullshit by the 60s, you'd have made a great 1960s bank manager. You could turn women down by day and sleep well by night.

And the second part is wrong too. Stick to what you're good at I guess. Bank managers of that time were enormously fond of the statement "I judge the man, not the man's income". I'd lay a sizeable bet that not ever, not even once was that sentence uttered with "woman" instead of "man".

Also, I'm not quite sure what you hope to achieve by making insults, as this exchange and previous others we've had always seem include them...?

I have an ongoing penchant for insulting fools and the pompous. Particularly when it's both at once.

If your ego is to fragile for that, **** off back to the main bored.

 

[Nickoo]

I wonder if the Adelaide official in hindsight would act in the same way after seeing the damage done to Tex and the effect it's had on him

So many people are itching to be righteous. When we say call our behaviour what we mean is to approach the person and call them out, not go to the club and the media.


Get vaxed. Protect yourself, your family and the country.

 

[deanc]

Have you seen the loan documents?



Apart from the fact that the housewife excuse was already becoming bullshit by the 60s, you'd have made a great 1960s bank manager. You could turn women down by day and sleep well by night.

And the second part is wrong too. Stick to what you're good at I guess. Bank managers of that time were enormously fond of the statement "I judge the man, not the man's income". I'd lay a sizeable bet that not ever, not even once was that sentence uttered with "woman" instead of "man".



I have an ongoing penchant for insulting fools and the pompous. Particularly when it's both at once.

If your ego is to fragile for that, fu** off back to the main bored.

Pompous, egotistical - oh OK! What's next; ostentatious, condescending, bombastic, pretentious, oh how about supercilious..?

Go back to the 'main board' - you mean the area were people usually don't resort to personal attacks and insults to those with a different view..!

Concur, bye bye...

 

[fumbler]

That video of him talking shit and shaking old mates hand is the biggest bullshit since Fremantle won a grand final

 

[IKE TURNER]

Pretty hefty price to pay, career and reputation down the gurgler for a brain fade

 

[maryjames]

 

[RAPPA]

View attachment 1202338
View attachment 1202340

View attachment 1202336

Tex does like a banana

 

[Laphroaig]

Pretty hefty price to pay, career and reputation down the gurgler for a brain fade

**** I hate the term "brain fade". It's the excuse you have when you're not having an excuse.

However.

When compared to one week for a deliberate elbow to the throat......

 

[Instincts]

Pretty hefty price to pay, career and reputation down the gurgler for a brain fade

Yeah I had a brain fade once and shot a guy, killing him. I shouldn't go to jail

 

[dav3]

Pretty hefty price to pay, career and reputation down the gurgler for a brain fade

His entire life has been a brain fade

 

[DanWA]

A lot of people form their opinion based on the media etc?

We all see him as a racist flog but that might not actually be him

For example generally people love Paul Haselby. Have met him multiple occassions and he is a dead set flog

 

[Mofra]

I bet Tex booed Adam Goodes

 

[Electronic_Renaissance]

A lot of people form their opinion based on the media etc?

We all see him as a racist flog but that might not actually be him

For example generally people love Paul Haselby. Have met him multiple occassions and he is a dead set flog

Disappointed to hear that, but did he know you were DanWA from BigFooty? That might explain it.