Remove this Banner Ad

Teams Team Development (Official Opening)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure what Hartlett has done to justify selection? obviously awkward price. Maric is extremely unlikely to get games. sadly hammer is ahead of him now and nankervis too. there's a fair chance nankervis could get ahead of hammer by rd 1 so i'd be looking at him instead out of those guys. otherwise it is very solid indeed.
Was inspired by reports from the Richmond intra club. May still be some life left in the mullet!
Hartlett has to be considered at his price. Given his proven history, anyone not considering him is playing this game wrong.
 
Was inspired by reports from the Richmond intra club. May still be some life left in the mullet!
Hartlett has to be considered at his price. Given his proven history, anyone not considering him is playing this game wrong.
I considered him for 2 seconds. Does that count? #spud
 
I considered him for 2 seconds. Does that count? #spud
no

cant call him a spud mate. he is an unfulfilled talented player, who we hope can realise his talent this year.

if we are talking about spuds, can i remind you that your team signed this guy?

VICKERY%20Ty.png
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

no

cant call him a spud mate. he is an unfulfilled talented player, who we hope can realise his talent this year.

if we are talking about spuds, can i remind you that your team signed this guy?

VICKERY%20Ty.png
And as a result they ain't my team anymore. ;)

Hartlett could be one to watch in the preseason but just can't see myself even considering pulling the trigger.

Vickery was signed for motivational purposes only. If they make the finals with him they know that they can afford to only name 17 players every week and still have a good chance of winning.

Let's get one thing clear. I was talking about spuds just in SC terms, not in every single facet of AFL, which Vickery has covered comfortably.:D:D
 
And as a result they ain't my team anymore. ;)

Hartlett could be one to watch in the preseason but just can't see myself even considering pulling the trigger.

Vickery was signed for motivational purposes only. If they make the finals with him they know that they can afford to only name 17 players every week and still have a good chance of winning.

Let's get one thing clear. I was talking about spuds just in SC terms, not in every single facet of AFL, which Vickery has covered comfortably.:D:D
HH isnt a spud in SC terms. 2011-2015 averaged 90+ with 101 average in 15...

true about Vickery though
 
no

cant call him a spud mate. he is an unfulfilled talented player, who we hope can realise his talent this year.

if we are talking about spuds, can i remind you that your team signed this guy?

VICKERY%20Ty.png

That spud has got Dixon covered :rolleyes:
 
upload_2017-2-12_17-26-35.png

Latest edit after making changes due to injured rookies. Have put Lynch in the forward line for the time being and will see how he goes in the preseason. Kicked 64 goals and ave. 92 SC points in a team that finished 4th last. Imagine what he could do if he got decent service from his midfield. Miller another serious consideration pending preseason form.
 
You been drinking TBA?
Kids on fire!!
nah man haha!
http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...ayerStatus2=A&tid2=14&pid2=3612&fid2=S&type=A

You paid a first and a second rounder for a bloke that averages 3 more disposals, 0.2 goals more per game, fewer tackles and hitouts, and nearly twice as many clangers.
He even has a greater TOG than Vickery...
you spent a pick 8 on Ty. that beats spending a first and a 2nd (which we ended up getting back) for Dixon.

Dixon has a history of injury, Vickery doesnt (IIRC) and getting triple teamed each week takes its toll on the body. Vickery wouldnt even know what its like to have an opponent, he would still find a way to be a spud without one :p
 
nah man haha!

you spent a pick 8 on Ty. that beats spending a first and a 2nd (which we ended up getting back) for Dixon.

Dixon has a history of injury, Vickery doesnt (IIRC) and getting triple teamed each week takes its toll on the body. Vickery wouldnt even know what its like to have an opponent, he would still find a way to be a spud without one :p

And we turned Vickery into Caddy.
Dixon has a history of being made of crate paper and being rubbish at footy. Vickery has a history of being dumb as dog shit and rubbish at footy. Both are rubbish, just Vickery is less rubbish.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

And we turned Vickery into Caddy.
Dixon has a history of being made of crate paper and being rubbish at footy. Vickery has a history of being dumb as dog shit and rubbish at footy. Both are rubbish, just Vickery is less rubbish.
whatever you think.

ill just say that Dixon kicked 41 goals in 16 games for the Suns in 2015...

Vickery hasnt kicked more than 30 in a year

but whatever floats your goat
 
whatever you think.

ill just say that Dixon kicked 41 goals in 16 games for the Suns in 2015...

Vickery hasnt kicked more than 30 in a year

but whatever floats your goat

I've seen Vickery kick 13 goals over 3 games in 2015, doesn't mean anything. he also kicked 31 goals in 15 games that year, which is 1 more than 30.
Both are still trash.
 
Vickery hasnt kicked more than 30 in a year
he's actually done it twice(2011,2015) and if he'd played every game last season & 2014 he would've done it those years. He's not as bad as people make him out to be. 30 goals a year isn't too bad for a forward who pinch hits in the ruck. + remember he's at Richmond where he's been the 2nd best forward half the games and the delivery is bad. Hawthorn will bring the age where Vickery is a half decent Forward Ruck
 
I've seen Vickery kick 13 goals over 3 games in 2015, doesn't mean anything. he also kicked 31 goals in 15 games that year, which is 1 more than 30.
Both are still trash.
Dixon >>>>>>> Vickery
he's actually done it twice(2011,2015) and if he'd played every game last season & 2014 he would've done it those years. He's not as bad as people make him out to be. 30 goals a year isn't too bad for a forward who pinch hits in the ruck. + remember he's at Richmond where he's been the 2nd best forward half the games and the delivery is bad. Hawthorn will bring the age where Vickery is a half decent Forward Ruck
arguing that Dixon is better than Vickery. ill agree that Vickery is better than some people make him out to be, but he isnt better than Dixon
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom