Tex rubbed out for a push

[cleanhands]

This dickhead literally brings the AFL into disrepute. How the hell this biased, racist, corrupt arseh*le still has an official position is way beyond me.

There appears to be no consistency in his decisions

 

[ams4crows]

The fact that Swans v Saints footage is the same thing and not cited has to be used as evidence.

 

[1970crow]

The fact that Swans v Saints footage is the same thing and not cited has to be used as evidence.

This is where I reckon the AFL will say that a forceful push is not ‘unreasonable’ if you and the pusher are engaged in the marking contest.

Not saying I agree, just that the AFL might see it that way.

 

[cmndstab]

They will just say that the result of Walker's push was heavier contact than in the other two examples.

 

[mick500]

So the appeal has been rejected and the 1 match ban has been upheld.

Now I'm seeing it was overturned on other websites.

 

[kirky]

So the appeal has been rejected and the 1 match ban has been upheld.

Colour me surprised.

 

[mick500]

Colour me surprised.

I'm seeing it reported on other sites that it has been overturned. Don't know what to believe atm .

 

[BunjiMC]

I'm seeing it reported on other sites that it has been overturned. Don't know what to believe atm .

This is very useless information.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

I’m not saying it’s an excuse, I’ve actually specifically stated I don’t think it should be. I have merely questioned whether the AFL take that into account if the other 2 aren’t cited.

And your taking the piss with your protecting teammate’ line, he pushed him into Dawson from behind, he was t shepherding or protecting in any way.

Do you think he intended to push him into Dawson?

 

[1990crow]

This is very useless information.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

So the appeal has been rejected and the 1 match ban has been upheld.

Now I'm seeing it was overturned on other websites.

Tribunal is still going, obviously some sites have jumped the gun

 

[1970crow]

They will just say that the result of Walker's push was heavier contact than in the other two examples.

That should affect the grading, but not the citing itself. Tex was the least forceful of the 3, arguable whether it meets the definition at all.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

 

[mick500]

This is very useless information.

Yes it is lol. Apologies. I jumped the gun.

 

[MatthewB]

 

[1990crow]

AFL: "Facts, Smacts"

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

AFL: "Facts, Smacts"

Curious that there was no response by the AFL and they went straight to deliberatation.

Not sure if that’s good or bad for us?

 

[1990crow]

Curious that there was no response by the AFL and they went straight to deliberatation.

Not sure if that’s good or bad for us?

Probably Kangaroo Court.

 

[Redline]

Confirmed that it has been upheld

 

[MatthewB]

was there any doubt

 

[Samcro24]

To the Supreme Court

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Curious that there was no response by the AFL and they went straight to deliberatation.

Not sure if that’s good or bad for us?

Bad

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Is there a secondary appeal process ?

 

[1990crow]

Is there a secondary appeal process ?

Receive less funding from the AFL option.

 

[mtbkym]

Was always going to be upheld, the media pile on demanded it, imagine how all those w***ers would’ve carried on if it was overturned? The whole industry is beyond laughable!!