Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You cannot demonstrate there are no unicorns flying around in the universe and a unicorn created the solar system. Its a dumb argument sorry. Basing an entire argument on one possibility out of a million, its naive, very naive. You cannot demostrate the fact that unicorn didnt create the world, if you can, go ahead.

We can prove its round, you just wont accept the evidence that is accepted by vast majority of the people in the world, science, religious people alike.
I'm not saying anything about unicorns and I find them irrelevant to this discussion.
I am also not saying it isn't possible the earth is round,I'm also not calling anyone names as a means to strengthen my argument.
Can you say it's impossible the earth is flat inside a simulation? Do you have proof we are not living inside a simulation?
I am also yet to even hear solid proof to dismiss cannots suggestion that the earth is in fact a pear shape.

Could you also suggest why someone could be considered a troll talking about how the earth could be flat in a thread tiled "Flat Earth?".
 
I'm not saying anything about unicorns and I find them irrelevant to this discussion.
I am also not saying it isn't possible the earth is round,I'm also not calling anyone names as a means to strengthen my argument.
Can you say it's impossible the earth is flat inside a simulation? Do you have proof we are not living inside a simulation?
I am also yet to even hear solid proof to dismiss cannots suggestion that the earth is in fact a pear shape.

Could you also suggest why someone could be considered a troll talking about how the earth could be flat in a thread tiled "Flat Earth?".

Nothing is impossible, but my point is not that whether earth is a simulation or not. The point being you claiming to disprove an impossibility is absurd. Can you disprove alien seeding? can you disprove flying unicorn theory? can you disprove god didnt create us? can you disprove accident theory? you cannot prove/disprove anything. I am just showing you the ridiculousness of your position. We can only believe in whats demonstrable, everything else is open for discussion

The point isnt about the earth being flat or not. The point is your unacceptance of globally accepted scientific evidence by every single scientist out there. If you are not willing to talk about scientific evidences and base your argument on one of the million probable hypothesis out there, then this is a non-argument.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

img_9928.jpeg
 

Well I'm convinced... again how about you respond to the questions and the evidence that clearly debunk this stupid theory rather than just posting crap that you (and the people that create them) don't understand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Well I'm convinced... again how about you respond to the questions and the evidence that clearly debunk this stupid theory rather than just posting crap that you (and the people that create them) don't understand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ill give it a go

meanwhile, i notice no one had a go at debunking this: outside of jarreds sterling efforts



once again the double standards of the nasa-nazi fan boys reares it ugly head
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Nothing is impossible, but my point is not that whether earth is a simulation or not. The point being you claiming to disprove an impossibility is absurd. Can you disprove alien seeding? can you disprove flying unicorn theory? can you disprove god didnt create us? can you disprove accident theory? you cannot prove/disprove anything. I am just showing you the ridiculousness of your position. We can only believe in whats demonstrable, everything else is open for discussion

The point isnt about the earth being flat or not. The point is your unacceptance of globally accepted scientific evidence by every single scientist out there. If you are not willing to talk about scientific evidences and base your argument on one of the million probable hypothesis out there, then this is a non-argument.
Who cares what every scientist from the religion of science says. They do not have proof about many things. There is also evidence or reasons why the universe is simulated. If you don't agree with the reasons,fine,but prove the current religion of science theories true. If the religion of science cannot prove their theories,as fact,other theories can be presented.
- The big bang can be explained by Sims. First there was nothing,then there was something. The loading of the simulation would be your magical big bang
- Quantum mechanics can be explained by Sims theory.
- Fine tuning can be explained by Sims.
- The emptiness of space can be explained by Sims. The empty space could be a way of saving on processing power.
- We know DNA is code. Why not if we go even smaller the entire universe is code.
- We can already create virtual worlds ourselves,who says we cannot develop these worlds further and create our own universes. If we can create our own universe it's possible someone has created this universe
- Sims explains Deja vu as a possible 'kink' in the simulation,this could be correct and there could be other kinks.
- Sims theory would explain a God or creator. A God has been suggested for centuries while never disproven.
- Mathamatic,the universe appears to be based around maths,a computer code would explain this as it to would be based around math.

The thread is based around a flat earth or flat earth theories. I propose the world is flat,and being simulated as round by the creator of the simulation.
 
No shit the CIA ran a disinfo operation at the time. Already public knowledge that they coined the term "conspiracy theorist".

It doesn't prove that the Earth is flat though.

Oh and that video is from a guy who believes satellites are a hoax.

quite yet it adds some more substance to dr cohans claims

any chance the masonic societies have influence on the cia ?

kinds of matches this too, oh dear

y3Lriux.jpg
 
Last edited:


Do you even watch these before you post them? It kept cutting out and jumping to something completely different before it even got to a point.

And last I checked the CIA logo doesn't have the CNBC, CNN and Fox News logos in it [emoji23].


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

ill give it a go

meanwhile, i notice no one had a go at debunking this: outside of jarreds sterling efforts



once again the double standards of the nasa-nazi fan boys reares it ugly head

Ive already pointed out that the entire youtube clip is a waste of time. I watched the whole thing (I doubt that you have) and there was nothing new in it and no evidence to support anything that you claim it does.

It was the biggest waste of time in my entire life, and ive done a lot of pointless stuff.

Your stance that I need to properly debunk a link you posted is absurd. Why dont you explain what you understand and put it in a format for discussion rather than spamming videos?

Cannot believe i actually put the time in to watch that youtube video only to find you laughing at me for it behind my back. Coward.
 
8f34d6L.jpg


Cannot believe i actually put the time in to watch that youtube video only to find you laughing at me for it behind my back. Coward.

im proud of you for watching the video :thumbsu:

im laughing at you for your 'debunking efforts' :thumbsdown:

i think you misunderstand the difference
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom